📄 Extracted Text (1,280 words)
From: Richard Kahn
To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Working to resolution
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 17:58:07 +0000
Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York NY 10022
Begin forwarded message:
From: Max Kohlenberg
Subject: RE: Working to resolution
Date: April 6, 2018 at 1:54:47 PM EDT
To: 'Richard Kahn'
Thanks Rich.
Original Messa e
From: Richard Kah
Sent: Friday, April 0 , .•
To: Max Kohlenberg
Subject: Re: Working to resolution
max,
if preferred noam can pay the 500k back to the trust, take the full 3 million distribuiton and gift the children
500k, same day. for exmple.
Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022
EFTA00841428
On Apr 6, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Max Kohlenberg wrote:
Rich -
I'm afraid I don't agree that negotiating the amount the children will receive needs to be gotten out of the way
first. I think the first step is to figure out which of the three alternatives that we've discussed are actually
viable. I am not concerned about Mass. law, but if a "carve ofF' for the children can't be accomplished
without triggering a retroactive estate tax (with interest and penalties) then it may be that the unitrust (at some
agreed rate) will be the only alternative worth considering. I am looking into that (as I said) and I will also
calculate the tax cost if we do follow a course that results in loss of the marital deduction, in case that cost
turns out to be little enough not to dissuade us from an approach that triggers it. If my concerns turn out to be
unfounded that will be great, of course, but some review of this issue at your end (whether by Beth
Tractenberg or some other attorney trusted by Noam) would be helpful.
As noted, given the children's concern that the money doesn't run out during Noam's lifetime, I'd really like to
see what the annuity figures might be for a life annuity (as opposed to a fixed term annuity). That could be
run assuming funding with $2M. The result would provide us with a baseline which we could scale from
depending on what amount might actually end up being allocated to the children.
I am also following up with Noam's daughters, as noted.
Max
A. Max Kohlenberg
Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP One Financial Plaza —
Suite 1600 Providence, Rhode Island 02903
Direc
Main:
Fax:
www.hekblaw.com
This email and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may
contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments
thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me by return
email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message or attachment. Thank you.
Original Message
From: Richard Kahn
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 12:34 PM
To: Max Kohlenberg
Subject:
the first issue is the amount that the children will claim belongs to them. lets get that out the way. I have
EFTA00841429
taken you at your word as you said that was definitely not the hold up as they only wanted to make sure the
assets were there for noams lifetime. the annuity can be custom structured for a guaranteed 5 year 8 or 10
year payout, for noam and his estate. the trust could buy the policy, no violation of mass law. I expect noam
to receive 2 million dollars of the 2.5 and the children can have the balance. we will need to deal with the
500k note. Beth will join the litigation if need be, so no advice for the moment.
Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York NY 10022
tel
fa
cel
On Apr 5, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Max Kohlenberg wrote:
Rich -
I will definitely be in touch with any questions (today if I can).
But a resolution today will not be possible. Harry is considering
the alternatives you've suggested, as am I. I will also want to
review the alternatives with Noam's daughters. (As I have noted,
although they are not trustees they remain essential parties to any
settlement.)
In addition to the substantive pros and cons of each approach, I will also need to consider the tax
implications of the various alternatives that have been suggested (annuity, unitrust or division/distribution),
since we don't want any resolution to constitute an impermissible disposition of a marital trust, as that would
trigger very substantial Massachusetts and federal estate taxes, interest and penalties, based on the
retroactive disallowance of the marital deduction taken at the time of Carol Chomsky's death. With respect
to this aspect, if Beth Tractenberg is already familiar with this case, perhaps we could have the benefit of her
insight on these issues? I would be grateful for that.
With respect to the annuity alternative, I'm not entirely sure I understand the materials provided by Jarad
Minsky. In particular it's not clear to me whether the annuity illustration shows a five year payout, with no
further payments even if Noam is still living in 2023, or whether it illustrates a minimum five year payout
(even if Noam dies during that time period). Would you have any objection to my speaking with Jarad
directly to clear up that question (and perhaps others)?
Thanks,
Max
A. Max Kohlenberg
Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP One Financial Plaza —
Suite 1600 Providence, Rhode Island 02903
EFTA00841430
www.hekblaw.com
This email and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may
contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any
attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
notify me by return email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message or attachment.
Thank you.
Original Message
From: Richard Kahn [mailto
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 9:26 AM
To: Max Kohlenberg
Subject:
I'm hoping for a resolution today . If you have any questions please
lets set a time to speak. Thank you
Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York, NY 10022
On Apr 4, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Max Kohlenberg wrote:
Thanks for this Rich. I will review it (and the prior email with attachments). I will get back to you ASAP
with any questions.
A. Max Kohlenberg
Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP One Financial Plaza -
Island 02903
EFTA00841431
www.hekblaw.com
This email and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and
may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any
attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
notify me by return email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message or attachment.
Thank you.
Original Message
From: Richard Kahn
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 201 :
To: Max Kohlenberg
Subject:
max:
without noams approval: which i would undertake to get - we can do a guaranteed 5 year payout for the 2
million leave the balance for hany and sisters.
if noam passes the balance of the 5 year goes to his estate... easy
Richard Kahn
HBRK Associates Inc.
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor
New York NY 10022
EFTA00841432
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
693c86bfc1e638eb7914cb1f3e199677c068898883f87fa6aebf9d54587528c8
Bates Number
EFTA00841428
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
5
Comments 0