EFTA00841427
EFTA00841428 DataSet-9
EFTA00841433

EFTA00841428.pdf

DataSet-9 5 pages 1,280 words document
P17 V15 D1 V16 P19
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,280 words)
From: Richard Kahn To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: Working to resolution Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 17:58:07 +0000 Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York NY 10022 Begin forwarded message: From: Max Kohlenberg Subject: RE: Working to resolution Date: April 6, 2018 at 1:54:47 PM EDT To: 'Richard Kahn' Thanks Rich. Original Messa e From: Richard Kah Sent: Friday, April 0 , .• To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: Re: Working to resolution max, if preferred noam can pay the 500k back to the trust, take the full 3 million distribuiton and gift the children 500k, same day. for exmple. Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 EFTA00841428 On Apr 6, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Max Kohlenberg wrote: Rich - I'm afraid I don't agree that negotiating the amount the children will receive needs to be gotten out of the way first. I think the first step is to figure out which of the three alternatives that we've discussed are actually viable. I am not concerned about Mass. law, but if a "carve ofF' for the children can't be accomplished without triggering a retroactive estate tax (with interest and penalties) then it may be that the unitrust (at some agreed rate) will be the only alternative worth considering. I am looking into that (as I said) and I will also calculate the tax cost if we do follow a course that results in loss of the marital deduction, in case that cost turns out to be little enough not to dissuade us from an approach that triggers it. If my concerns turn out to be unfounded that will be great, of course, but some review of this issue at your end (whether by Beth Tractenberg or some other attorney trusted by Noam) would be helpful. As noted, given the children's concern that the money doesn't run out during Noam's lifetime, I'd really like to see what the annuity figures might be for a life annuity (as opposed to a fixed term annuity). That could be run assuming funding with $2M. The result would provide us with a baseline which we could scale from depending on what amount might actually end up being allocated to the children. I am also following up with Noam's daughters, as noted. Max A. Max Kohlenberg Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP One Financial Plaza — Suite 1600 Providence, Rhode Island 02903 Direc Main: Fax: www.hekblaw.com This email and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me by return email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message or attachment. Thank you. Original Message From: Richard Kahn Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 12:34 PM To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: the first issue is the amount that the children will claim belongs to them. lets get that out the way. I have EFTA00841429 taken you at your word as you said that was definitely not the hold up as they only wanted to make sure the assets were there for noams lifetime. the annuity can be custom structured for a guaranteed 5 year 8 or 10 year payout, for noam and his estate. the trust could buy the policy, no violation of mass law. I expect noam to receive 2 million dollars of the 2.5 and the children can have the balance. we will need to deal with the 500k note. Beth will join the litigation if need be, so no advice for the moment. Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York NY 10022 tel fa cel On Apr 5, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Max Kohlenberg wrote: Rich - I will definitely be in touch with any questions (today if I can). But a resolution today will not be possible. Harry is considering the alternatives you've suggested, as am I. I will also want to review the alternatives with Noam's daughters. (As I have noted, although they are not trustees they remain essential parties to any settlement.) In addition to the substantive pros and cons of each approach, I will also need to consider the tax implications of the various alternatives that have been suggested (annuity, unitrust or division/distribution), since we don't want any resolution to constitute an impermissible disposition of a marital trust, as that would trigger very substantial Massachusetts and federal estate taxes, interest and penalties, based on the retroactive disallowance of the marital deduction taken at the time of Carol Chomsky's death. With respect to this aspect, if Beth Tractenberg is already familiar with this case, perhaps we could have the benefit of her insight on these issues? I would be grateful for that. With respect to the annuity alternative, I'm not entirely sure I understand the materials provided by Jarad Minsky. In particular it's not clear to me whether the annuity illustration shows a five year payout, with no further payments even if Noam is still living in 2023, or whether it illustrates a minimum five year payout (even if Noam dies during that time period). Would you have any objection to my speaking with Jarad directly to clear up that question (and perhaps others)? Thanks, Max A. Max Kohlenberg Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP One Financial Plaza — Suite 1600 Providence, Rhode Island 02903 EFTA00841430 www.hekblaw.com This email and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me by return email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message or attachment. Thank you. Original Message From: Richard Kahn [mailto Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 9:26 AM To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: I'm hoping for a resolution today . If you have any questions please lets set a time to speak. Thank you Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 On Apr 4, 2018, at 9:09 AM, Max Kohlenberg wrote: Thanks for this Rich. I will review it (and the prior email with attachments). I will get back to you ASAP with any questions. A. Max Kohlenberg Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP One Financial Plaza - Island 02903 EFTA00841431 www.hekblaw.com This email and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me by return email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message or attachment. Thank you. Original Message From: Richard Kahn Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 201 : To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: max: without noams approval: which i would undertake to get - we can do a guaranteed 5 year payout for the 2 million leave the balance for hany and sisters. if noam passes the balance of the 5 year goes to his estate... easy Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor New York NY 10022 EFTA00841432
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
693c86bfc1e638eb7914cb1f3e199677c068898883f87fa6aebf9d54587528c8
Bates Number
EFTA00841428
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
5

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!