EFTA02598186
EFTA02598188 DataSet-11
EFTA02598190

EFTA02598188.pdf

DataSet-11 2 pages 503 words document
P17 V16 P19 V11 D6
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (503 words)
From: Vincenzo lozzo < Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:47 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: Re: do you have time for a brief call today? true, but they have other advantages. eg: in the iron example is that =pparently chinese companies are fucking international player over by =laying with the exchange rate So I think the hope there is that by pegging their own currency, they =ill save money and not get screwed Another example could be Apple in Russia at the moment - they had to =alt sales because of the ruble fluctuation On 19/dic/2014, at 09:44, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > Taxes > On Friday, December 19, 2014, Vincenzo lozzo <-> =rote: > the quick summary is the following: > we told you how the idea is to build a protocol where you can transact > =n any possible asset class/currencies. But then this morning I realized =omething which is instead of just transacting in already existing =urrencies/assets we can go one step further meaning we can create them. > so the case in point is that I read somewhere that people transacting =n Iron are thinking about creating their own currency just for that =ype of transaction (the reasons are interesting but maybe another =ime). But that's a lot of work for them, cause they need to create the =urrency and then the network to accept the transaction etc etc. > Whereas what we do is essentially a webpage where a company can go and =reate its own currency with its own rules "IronCurrency can only be =sed by this list of users in the network and its pegged to the dollar =tc etc". What we do then is to create the new currency for them and add =t to our network and they are ready to go in essentially no time. > Maybe I'm overly excited but I think it's a great idea because you =ssentially allow people to create their own currency with the click of = button and start using it in zero time. > What do you think? > On 19/dic/2014, at 08:47, Vincenzo lozzo <-> wrote: » I got an epiphany/eureka moment this morning and I think you'd like » =t >> > please note > The information contained in this communication is confidential, may > be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and > is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of > JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or EFTA_R1_01784092 EFTA02598188 > any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you > have received this communication in error, please notify us > immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], > and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all > attachments. copyright -all rights reserved <?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version=.0"> <dict> <key>conversation-id</key> <integer>310137</integer> <key>date-last-viewed</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>date-received</key> <integer>1419000441</integer> <key>flags</key> <integer>8590195713</integer> <key>gmail-label-ids</key> <array> <integer>6</integer> <integer>2</integer> </array> <key>remote-id</key> <string>465001</string> </dict> </plist> 2 EFTA_R1_01784093 EFTA02598189
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
6e6943365b6f3c15fe650c374ac4183a70880d6cb3feb2a39bf94e79643eb76c
Bates Number
EFTA02598188
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!