EFTA00222984.pdf

DataSet-9 1 page 196 words document
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (196 words)
THE SIXTH AMENDMENT DOES NOT APPLY TO PRE-INDICTMENT PROCEEDINGS. Epstein's assertion of a Sixth Amendment violation is meritless. The right to effective assistance of counsel does not attach until adversary judicial proceedings have been initiated against a defendant. Kirby I Illinois , 406 U.S. 682 (1972). For this reason, the Sixth Amendment does not apply to a grand jury investigation, and a demand for information related to the attorney-client relationship prior to that time does not violate the client's right to counsel or interfere with his future right to counsel. In re Special September 1978 Grand Jury (II) , 640 F.2d 49, 64 (7th Cir. 1980); Tornayl United States , 840 F.2d 1424 (9th Cir. 1988). Adversary judicial proceedings have yet to begin in the federal system and also had not begun in the state system at the time the computers were removed; thus, the Sixth Amendment is not implicated. Furthermore, the attorney-client privilege does not excuse a witness from testifying on the ground that his entire attorney-client relationship would be endangered, for it is confidential communications that are protected, not the relationship as a whole. McKay I , 886 F.2d 1237 (9th Cir. 1989). EFTA00222984
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
6f52af4df94c6719e916307ff5d78e182dfa28c6813fd5dc5ba8a8b0cb86fd48
Bates Number
EFTA00222984
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
1

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!