Correct The Record Tuesday December 16, 2014 Afternoon Roundup

podesta-emails 4,114 words email

D6 P17 V11 P21 V15

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Tuesday December 16, 2014 Afternoon Roundup:* *Headlines:* *Wall Street Journal: “Jeb Bush to ‘Actively Explore’ Run for President” <http://www.wsj.com/articles/jeb-bush-to-actively-explore-run-for-president-1418743577>* “Jeb Bush will ‘actively explore the possibility of running for president’ in 2016, according to an announcement the former Florida governor posted to his Facebook page Tuesday morning.” *FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters For America: “The Right's Jeb Bush-Hillary Clinton Double Standard” <http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/12/16/the-rights-jeb-bush-hillary-clinton-double-stan/201894>* “While the Clintons have done well financially since President Bill Clinton left office, Secretary Clinton has been consistent in her support for issues like increasing the minimum wage, paid family medical leave, and support for equal pay.” *Washington Post: “O’Malley will probably put off announcement on presidential bid until spring” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/omalley-will-probably-delay-announcement-on-presidential-bid-until-spring/2014/12/15/43f733ba-8458-11e4-9534-f79a23c40e6c_story.html>* “Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley will probably push off an announcement about running for president until spring, a timetable that reflects the dominance of Hillary Rodham Clinton in the Democratic field and the daunting challenges that O’Malley faces in raising money, according to several people helping him prepare for a possible bid.” *Bloomberg: “Elizabeth Warren Would Make a Good President, Carl Levin Says” <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-12-16/elizabeth-warren-would-make-a-good-president-carl-levin-says>* “Levin also listed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, saying that she feels ‘in her gut’ the impact of the country's widening income gap and the importance of addressing it.” *Politico: “David Axelrod: Elizabeth Warren trying to ‘leverage’ Clinton” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/david-axelrod-elizabeth-warren-113600.html?hp=l2_4>* “Former Obama adviser David Axelrod said Tuesday that he believes Sen. Elizabeth Warren is keeping a high profile to try to exert ‘maximum leverage’ on Hillary Clinton’s positions for the 2016 presidential contest.” *Slate: “MoveOn Appears To Be Losing Mojo, Ramps Up Warren Push” <http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/12/16/elizabeth_warren_for_president_moveon_org_appears_to_be_losing_email_subscribers.html>* “According to numbers from Unroll.me, MoveOn.org’s newsletter was the second-most unsubscribed in 2014 (the first was StumbleUpon), with a 48 percent unsubscribe rate.” *Articles:* *Wall Street Journal: “Jeb Bush to ‘Actively Explore’ Run for President” <http://www.wsj.com/articles/jeb-bush-to-actively-explore-run-for-president-1418743577>* By Reid J. Epstein December 16, 2014, 11:20 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] Former Florida Governor to Launch Political-Action Committee in January Jeb Bush will “actively explore the possibility of running for president” in 2016, according to an announcement the former Florida governor posted to his Facebook page Tuesday morning. Mr. Bush, whose father and brother served as president, is the first Republican to formally explore a 2016 candidacy. More than a dozen others are publicly weighing whether to seek the White House. Mr. Bush wrote that he discussed running with his family over the Thanksgiving holiday and will launch a political-action committee in January to promote his political ideals. The announcement doesn’t say that he has formed an exploratory committee to raise money to back a presidential campaign. A two-term governor, Mr. Bush is considered a social and fiscal conservative, though he has broken with party orthodoxy on immigration and education policy—two issues that figure to be central to the GOP’s 2016 primary campaign. Mr. Bush has been a strong backer of Common Core education standards and an immigration overhaul, which put him at odds with many Republican lawmakers and voters. Mr. Bush has also had a low-grade feud with antitax activist Grover Norquist, whose no-tax pledge is central to party orthodoxy. Mr. Bush has refused to sign Mr. Norquist’s pledge. Mr. Norquist this month called Mr. Bush “washed up.” Due to his family connections—his father George H.W. Bush and brother George W. Bush were the last two GOP presidents—Mr. Bush has the capacity to raise substantial amounts of money as fast as any other Republican who would join the race. He would be viewed as a favorite of the party establishment, competing for donors and votes with New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie . Mr. Bush would also be a threat to Florida Sen. Marco Rubio , another potential 2016 candidate. The two men share a Miami political base—Mr. Bush’s office is in the same hotel where Mr. Rubio uses the gym when he is town. In recent remarks, Mr. Bush had indicated he was strongly considering running. At The Wall Street Journal’s CEO Council gathering earlier this month, he said his decision would depend on whether he has “the skills to do it in a way that tries to lift people’s spirits and not get sucked into the vortex.” He added at the time: “I don’t know if I would be a good candidate or a bad one, but I kinda know how a Republican could win, whether it’s me or somebody else, and it has to be much more uplifting, much more positive.” David Axelrod, a top adviser to Barack Obama ’s two presidential campaigns, said Tuesday that Mr. Bush would make a “formidable general election candidate” if he isn’t forced to adopt positions more conservative than he already holds. “The problem is in order to get the nomination they have to make Faustian bargains on issues that take them to the right,” Mr. Axelrod said on MSNBC. “If Jeb sticks to his guns on these issues, he’s got tremendous appeal to the Hispanic community, he could be a very formidable candidate.” *FROM MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: Media Matters For America: “The Right's Jeb Bush-Hillary Clinton Double Standard” <http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/12/16/the-rights-jeb-bush-hillary-clinton-double-stan/201894>* By Karen Finney December 16, 2014 [Subtitle:] Conservative Attacks On Clinton's Wealth Follows Their Defense Of Romney Two years after the fact, right-wing media are trying to flip the narrative that sunk their presidential aspirations in 2012 by charging that current personal wealth and the fees for paid speeches since leaving the State Department make former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton "out of touch." Often aided by Beltway reporters who are fixated on Clinton's so-called "money problem," conservative pundits want to ensure that the majority of Americans's belief that the potential Democratic nominee for president relates to and understands average citizens. The facts show that Clinton's earnings on the speaking circuit are consistent with a number of men of similar prominence. According to one estimate, over 15 months from the end of her term as Secretary through May 2014, Clinton made $5 million dollars. In the 13 months before former Mayor Rudy Giuliani ran for president in 2007, he earned more than $11 million dollars, charging anywhere from $100,000 to $300,000. According to a number of reports former Secretary of State Colin Powell has received between $100,000 and $200,000 per speech, earning an estimated $6.7 million in speaking fees in 2000 alone. As the charges against Clinton illustrate, the GOP still doesn't understand why the "out of touch" label resonated with voters in 2012. It wasn't former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney's wealth, or that he did well financially during his time at Bain Capital. Rather it was the GOP presidential nominee's comments writing off 47 percent of the American electorate, claiming they just wanted "free stuff," as well as his support for massive tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans as a job creation strategy while imposing steep spending cuts impacting everyone else. In short, Romney really WAS out of touch. While the Clintons have done well financially since President Bill Clinton left office, Secretary Clinton has been consistent in her support for issues like increasing the minimum wage, paid family medical leave, and support for equal pay. She also has a long record advocating and supporting policies around the economic empowerment of women, the role they play in a nation's economy, and micro-lending, from her time as first lady of Arkansas to the White House to the State Department to the Clinton Foundation. Enter former Florida governor Jeb Bush to the 2016 equation. Based on the conservative line of argument against Clinton, will the millions he's made on paid speeches since leaving office in 2007, or the $3.2 million in board fees and stock grants he's received from publicly traded companies, also label him "out of touch" in the eyes of conservative media? What about his million-dollar salary from Barclays or what the New York Times termed his "unapologetic determination to expand his wealth," including "telling friends that his finances had suffered during his time in government"? Or, will conservative media hold Bush to the same standard they did for Romney in 2012, when they declared that neither his wealth, his offshore accounts, nor his record at Bain Capital were relevant issues in the election in evaluating Romney's candidacy? Back then such concerns were "an effort to distract" from real issues like jobs and the economy, as one Fox News anchor put it. Never mind that it was Romney himself who held out his Bain experience as evidence that he understood the economy and how things worked, yet didn't seem to have much regard for the impact of jobs lost when Bain shut down a company had on the personal economy of middle and low income people. Even Romney now admits that his work at Bain Capital was a liability to his presidential aspirations, recently suggesting that because of his work in private equity Bush may also have a "Mitt Romney problem." Or as described by a recent Bloomberg Politics report, "As a budding private equity mogul, he's begun to resemble a Mini-Mitt." The report examined a number of Bush's private sector enterprises, but it's the detail about the three funds he's launched through Britton Hill Holdings, which he co-founded in 2013, that could require some explaining. They include a $40 million fund focused on shale oil exploration and a $26 million fund called BH Logistics, which is backed in part by investors from China, where the Bush name carries significant clout. Bush was also recently named chairman and manager of an offshore private equity fund called BH Global Aviation. Incorporated in the United Kingdom, the firm is not subject to U.S. taxes or regulations and raised $61 million in September through unknown foreign investors. Over the weekend Bush said that in an effort to promote transparency, he'd be releasing 250,000 emails from his time as governor of Florida and an e-book outlining his approach to governing. Those efforts will help frame his position on issues like education reform and immigration reform, which put him at odds with the Republican primary electorate and parts of the conservative press. But given that its unlikely right-wing media will hold Governor Bush to the same standard as Secretary Clinton, will Bush also be transparent about the details of his time in the private sector? More broadly, will the media fully examine the "potential political problems" of Jeb Bush's "unapologetic" expansion of wealth? *Washington Post: “O’Malley will probably put off announcement on presidential bid until spring” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/omalley-will-probably-delay-announcement-on-presidential-bid-until-spring/2014/12/15/43f733ba-8458-11e4-9534-f79a23c40e6c_story.html>* By John Wagner December 15, 2014, 7:12 p.m. EST Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley will probably push off an announcement about running for president until spring, a timetable that reflects the dominance of Hillary Rodham Clinton in the Democratic field and the daunting challenges that O’Malley faces in raising money, according to several people helping him prepare for a possible bid. The thinking comes as O’Malley convenes some of his biggest supporters in Annapolis on Tuesday for a day of political briefings capped off by a reception at a private residence. While the invitation advertises talk of “the way forward for our country,” aides say the agenda does not include any definite word on O’Malley’s 2016 ambitions. Just a few months ago, O’Malley said he would “probably” make up his mind about running by the time his tenure as governor ends in late January. Some advisers have urged the governor, who is barely registering in the polls, to get in early with the aim of becoming better known and establishing himself as a more progressive and forward-looking alternative to Clinton. But the more likely scenario, according to several people close to O’Malley, is to wait until around April, allowing him more time to ponder his place in a race that almost no one thinks he can win and to assess how Clinton is faring under mounting scrutiny from the news media and Democratic activists. “Right now, things are all Hillary all the time,” said one Democratic consultant with ties to O’Malley, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. “It makes no sense for him to make a decision until that dies down and we see where the race stands.” After a year of intense travel — including numerous stops in Iowa, New Hampshire and other early nominating states — O’Malley has kept a relatively low profile since the bruising midterm elections. In his heavily Democratic state, he saw his hand-picked successor upset by a Republican who argued that electing Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown (D) would be tantamount to giving O’Malley a third term. O’Malley’s job approval rating has slid, and most leading Democrats in Maryland are rallying around Clinton. There are also questions about the extent to which donors in Maryland, deflated by Brown’s loss, will continue to help bankroll O’Malley’s ambitions once he is no longer in office — and how extensive a fundraising network he can build beyond that. O’Malley would almost certainly run to Clinton’s left in the primaries, and he has compiled a list of accomplishments as governor that he could tout, including legalizing same-sex marriage, abolishing the death penalty, raising the minimum wage and granting in-state college tuition rates to undocumented immigrants. He has also called for a special prosecutor to reopen cases against CIA officials involved in controversial interrogations, telling the New York Times that “the United States does not torture and should not torture.” In recent days, O’Malley has also echoed the criticism Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) leveled at Congress for including a provision sought by Wall Street in an omnibus spending bill. Still, O’Malley has long fashioned himself as more of a can-do executive than a liberal crusader, and there are likely to be others in the Democratic field, including Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.), who will make an appeal to the left wing of the party. There are also personal considerations for O’Malley, a father of four, who is moving his family back to Baltimore as he wraps up his second term as governor following a seven-year tenure as mayor of Maryland’s largest city. “For 15 years, he has been in some pretty intense public service,” said Terry Lierman, a former Maryland Democratic Party chairman who has been helping O’Malley’s political action committee raise money. “Maybe it’s time to take a break, put family first and assess where he is and where he wants to go. I think that’s fair.” Many longtime associates continue to believe O’Malley is more likely to run than not, even if the odds appear long. “He’s smart enough to know you have to be in the consideration set to win,” said Trevor Cornwell, a technology company executive in the San Francisco Bay Area who met O’Malley more than 30 years ago, when both were working on Gary Hart’s 1984 presidential campaign. Cornwell, who is helping O’Malley raise money, said he could see him moving forward “if he believes it’s the right thing in terms of his ability to contribute his voice on issues that matter.” O’Malley is doing many of the things that would be expected of someone gearing up for a White House bid. He has retained Bill Hyers, the architect of Democratic New York Mayor Bill de Blasio’s campaign last year, as a senior adviser. O’Malley met privately with several potential donors while in Los Angeles last week for a Democratic Governors Association meeting and then headed to Seattle to court more prospects. If O’Malley gets in the presidential race, “I do not underestimate his ability to gain a lot of traction,” said Lanny Davis, a former lawyer to President Bill Clinton who has supported O’Malley as governor but is backing Hillary Clinton in 2016. Davis, a Maryland resident, credited O’Malley for being “a hands-on governor who did a lot of good things,” but like many said he thinks O’Malley’s odds of winning the Democratic nomination are slim. “It would take serious mistakes from Secretary Clinton,” Davis said. Clinton has said she will probably make a decision about running after the first of the year. Speculation about her timeline, however, has started to shift in the wake of several recently planned paid speeches, including one in March. Several O’Malley associates suggested that her popularity could sag with the increased scrutiny that will come in the new year. The landscape O’Malley would face could be clearer come March or April, they say. O’Malley spokeswoman Lis Smith declined to discuss O’Malley’s timetable for a potential White House bid but insisted “nothing has changed” regarding his intentions since a Washington Post interview in September when he said he would “probably” make up his mind about running by Jan. 21, when his term ends. Fundraising remains a looming challenge for O’Malley and other Democrats considering a race likely to involve Clinton. By Maryland standards, O’Malley was a prolific fundraiser as governor, and he gained exposure to donors across the country during stints as chairman and finance chairman of the Democratic Governors Association. But he would be competing against Clinton for some of the same dollars. “It’s always a challenge when you have a dominant candidate,” said Bruce Charash, a New York cardiologist who has given to O’Malley’s PAC and is planning to attend Tuesday’s gathering in Annapolis. “The Clintons have built an enormous fundraising base. . . . But there are a lot of people who want to see more than one candidate and a lot of people who see Martin as the more progressive candidate.” O’Malley has funded his political activities through a political action committee, which had close to $1 million in the bank as of last month. None of that money can be used on a presidential campaign. For the coming months, aides say, O’Malley will probably continue using the PAC to pay for his modest-size political staff and to make appearances around the country. Unlike a presidential committee, there are no limits on what donors can give, so a relatively small number of loyal supporters can keep the PAC afloat. This month, O’Malley’s O’Say Can You See PAC reported raising $581,550 during a seven-week stretch in October and November. About half of that came from just 18 donors who gave $10,000 or more. If O’Malley were to announce a presidential bid and open a fundraising account, donors would be allowed to give only about $2,700 during the primaries. Some activists in early nominating states hope to see O’Malley jump in sooner rather than later. “I just think if you’re serious about running for president, you should get out here and get started,” said Tom Henderson, the longtime chairman of the Polk County Democrats in Iowa. “You want to get in and lay the groundwork for the caucuses.” Henderson said that it’s unclear how much “pizazz” O’Malley has but that he thinks the Maryland governor has the potential to be a credible candidate in a state where a sizable number of Democrats are looking for an alternative to Clinton. One reason Henderson said he knows O’Malley is seriously looking at the race: He recently got a Christmas card from him. Kathleen Sullivan, a former chairwoman of the New Hampshire Democratic Party, said O’Malley clearly faces long odds if Clinton enters the race, as she hopes the former secretary of state will. “I think it’s an uphill climb for Governor O’Malley, no question,” Sullivan said. “But New Hampshire is the kind of state where people can climb mountains.” *Bloomberg: “Elizabeth Warren Would Make a Good President, Carl Levin Says” <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-12-16/elizabeth-warren-would-make-a-good-president-carl-levin-says>* By Annie Linskey December 16, 2014, 11:20 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] But he won't tell her to run. Senator Elizabeth Warren is one of several potential standard-bearers for the Democratic Party, which would benefit from a competitive presidential primary, retiring Senator Carl Levin said Tuesday. "Sure she would make a good president," the Michigan Democrat said at a Bloomberg News breakfast. "She's got a lot of fire in the area of consumer protection." Levin also listed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, saying that she feels "in her gut" the impact of the country's widening income gap and the importance of addressing it. Levin said Democrats need to talk more about their efforts to protect the middle class, and he acknowledged that doing so could turn off some of the Wall Street and Silicon Valley donors who are giving record amounts to fund political campaigns. "This is the New Deal, the fair deal, the square deal," Levin said. "I believe as a party we have to let it come out and not worry about the impact of campaign contributions. We can't worry about that." Levin didn't seek another term and is set to be replaced by Democratic Representative Gary Peters. He demurred on recommending that Massachusetts' Warren get into the race. "I'm not going to advise anyone to run when I'm not running," he said. *Politico: “David Axelrod: Elizabeth Warren trying to ‘leverage’ Clinton” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/david-axelrod-elizabeth-warren-113600.html?hp=l2_4>* By Lucy McCalmont December 16, 2014, 10:20 a.m. EST Former Obama adviser David Axelrod said Tuesday that he believes Sen. Elizabeth Warren is keeping a high profile to try to exert “maximum leverage” on Hillary Clinton’s positions for the 2016 presidential contest. “I think Elizabeth’s very sincere about her concerns about what’s happening in the American economy and Hillary hasn’t said yet what exactly her program will be, what she’s running on,” Axelrod said Tuesday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “I think Elizabeth knows she’s got maximum leverage by still being in the conversation.” When asked if there was a possibility for an opening for Warren to run, Axelrod responded, “I suppose.” “My suspicion is that what she’s doing is trying to influence how Hillary frames her candidacy and the issues she focuses on,” he said. Axelrod added that Clinton runs the risk of facing similar pitfalls in 2008 by being overly cautious to define herself and her platform. “You hear ‘Ready For Hillary’— It’s like, ready for what?” Axelrod said, noting that as a candidate in 2008, Clinton was very effective in reaching the American people, but only after the New Hampshire primary when “her back was to the wall, she through caution to the wind.” “And now Hillary’s task is to define what it is that she’s running for and running about and what would the future look like under another President Clinton,” he said. “And I suspect that what she’s taking her time working through now, but she has to answer that question.?” *Slate: “MoveOn Appears To Be Losing Mojo, Ramps Up Warren Push” <http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/12/16/elizabeth_warren_for_president_moveon_org_appears_to_be_losing_email_subscribers.html>* By Betsy Woodruff December 16, 2014, 12:31 p.m. EST MoveOn.org has snagged headlines for its Elizabeth Warren for President agitation, but behind the scenes, things may be looking bleak for the group. According to numbers from Unroll.me, MoveOn.org’s newsletter was the second-most unsubscribed in 2014 (the first was StumbleUpon), with a 48 percent unsubscribe rate. Spokesman Frankie Timmons said those numbers are based on a random sample of 500,000 Unroll.me users. Among that group, nearly half of MoveOn.org subscribers ended their subscriptions. Unroll.me is a site that lets users mass-unsubscribe from email newsletters, and MoveOn.org was the only politics site to make their most-unsubscribed list. It’s a dubious distinction. With the ascent of Hillary Clinton—a former Walmart board member who voted in 2002 to give President Bush the authority to go to war in Iraq—the progressive left is desperately hunting for a 2016 presidential standard-bearer. MoveOn.org has won substantial media attention for its “Run Warren Run” campaign and its plans to host an event in a Des Moines, Iowa coffee shop to try to demonstrate that the Massachusetts Democratic senator has “grassroots” support. When Warren and her allies tried last week to block a government funding bill that changed some of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street regulations, there was an uptick in populist progressive rhetoric on the Hill. But Warren and the liberal contingent failed to stop the bill, despite finding odd bedfellows in Tea Party conservatives who loathed it with equal passion (though for different reasons). If MoveOn.org’s subscription levels are decreasing as precipitously as UnRoll.me suggests, then those progressives may be struggling to pitch their message. MoveOn.org did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the UnRoll.me data.