📄 Extracted Text (2,571 words)
C rw4.-ta. \-2 •
BURMAN, CRITTON
LUTTIERSLCOLEMAN,LLP
YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES
A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
J. MICHAEL BURMAN. PA." ADELQVI J. RENAVENTE
GREGORY W. COLEMAN. RA- PARALEGAL/INVESTIGATOR
ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR.. PA. ' JESSICA CADWELL
BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER BOBBIE M. MCKENNA
MARK T. LUTTIER PA. ASHLIE STOKEN-BARING
JEFFREY C. PEPIN BETTY STOKES
MICHAEL J. PIKE PARALEGALS
HEATHER MCNAMARA RUDA
DAVID A. YARENA
January 8, 2010 RITA H. BUDNYK
COUNSEL
EDWARD M. RICCI
'FLORIDA WARD CIRTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER SPtCIM CONSUMER
2ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA AND COLORADO JUSTICE COUNSEL
BY HAND DELIVERY
Judge Donald Hafele
Fifteenth Judicial Circuit
Re: v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al.
Case No. 502008CA037319XXXX MBAB
1(26/10, 8:10 a.m. - 30-minute Special Set Hearing on Defendant Epstein's
Motion for Sanctions against Spencer Kuvin, Esq. and Alternative Motion
to Identify
Dear Judge Hafele:
With reference to the above-mentioned 30-minute special set hearing on January
26, 2010, enclosed please find Defendant, Epstein's Supplement to His Motion for
ctions Against Spencer Kuvin, Esq. and Alternative Motion to Identify Based Upon
Co I, Spencer Kuvin, Making Several statements to the Media and By
IdentifyingM. By Her Full Legal Name in a Pu lic cument.
Cordi-ly urs,
Mich Pike
MJP/clz
Enclosures
cc: Spencer Kuvin, Esq.
Jack Goldberger, Esq.
PHONE: • FAX: • MAI Le BC LC LAWCOM
WWW.BCLCLAW.COM
EFTA00723572
IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB
Plaintiff,
v.
JEF PSTEIN
an
Defendants.
Defendant, Epstein's Supplement to His Motion For
Sanc Against Spencer Kuvin, Esq. And Alternative Motion To Identify Based
Upon 's Counsel. Slicer Kuvin, Making Several Statements to the Media and
Y Identifying By Her Full Legal Name in a Public Document
Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Mr. Epstein"), by and through his
undersigned attorneys hereby files his Supplement to his Motion for Sanctions
and Alternative Motion to Identify M. (the "Initial Motion"). In support, Epstein
states as follows:
EFTA00723573
I v. Epstein
e No. 2008CA037319X)CO0MMI
Page 2 of 7
ISM
MEM =i■
3
■
b.
■
EFTA00723574
taseNo.
Page 3 of 7
EFTA00723575
■. v. Epstein
Case No. 2008CA037319X.XXXINBAB
Page 4 of 7
EFTA00723576
v. E stein
se No. 2008CA037319XXXXMBAB
Page 5 of 7
5.
■. should now be identified in the style of this case. To hold otherwise would
prevent Epstein from discovering facts and witnesses that could support his
defenses against ■., and would further prevent Epstein from eliminating the
likelihood of unfair surprise at trial. It is the undersigned's experience in these type
2 The foregoing is but a sample of the of the publications and media broadcasts that resulted from
Mr. Kuvin's statements to the media.
EFTA00723577
v. Eosteln
se No. 2008CA037319XXXXMBAB
Page 8 of 7
cases that once a "Doe" is identified, witnesses come forward with information that
support a Defendant's defenses. This valuable discovery should not be stifled
merely because a wishes to travel under a pseudonym after
6. As stated in the Initial Motion, courts have reasoned that there is no
express or implied right to bring an action anonymously. Moreover, Fed. R. Civ. P
10(a) requires that the complaint include the names of the parties. Furthermore,
Plaintiff is now an adult, and under the current circumstances set forth herein, the fact
that she "might" suffer some personal embarrassment, standing alone, does not
require the granting of a request to proceed under a pseudonym, especially when
WHEREFORE, Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests the Court
enter an order granting the relief requested herein and in the Initial Motion, and for
any additional relief the Court deems just and proper.
Certificate of Service
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and
U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 8th day of January, 2010:
EFTA00723578
R v. Epstein
e No. 2008CA037319XXXXMBAB
Pago 7 of 7
Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Jack Goldberger, Esq.
Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
Fax: Fax:
Counsel for Plaintiff Co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey
Epstein
BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER
LEMAN LLP
By:
Robert D. Critton, Jr.
Florida Bar #224162
Michael J. Pike
Florida Bar #617296
(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
EFTA00723579
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA
CASE NO:
502008CA037319XXXXMB AB
Plaintiff,
COPY
vs. RECEIVED FOR FILING
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
DEC 1 1 '&105
SHARON R. BOCK
Defendant. CLERK& COMPTROLLF-R
CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
TO ADD A CLAIM UNDER RICO AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES
Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, and files this Motion for Leave to
Procedure
Amend Complaint to Seek Punitive Damages pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil
1.190(f) and F.S. § 768.72 and as grounds therefore, states as follows:
R.I.C.O.
1. This is an action currently includes a cause of action for: Intentional infliction of
emotional distress and Sexual Battery .
2. Pursuant to Florida rule of Civil Procedure 1.190(a) Plaintiff seeks leave to amend
"RICO" Fla. Star
to add a separate count for Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act
§§895.01 et.seq.
3. Defendant has already answered the previous complaint and there is no prejudice
to Defendant by allowing this amendment.
EFTA00723580
given. "The public policy of
4. Pursuant to Rule 1.190(a) amendments should be freely
r v. Ferrell, 666 So. 2d 556, 557 (Fla.
Florida is to freely allow amendment of pleadings," Carte
of a pleading constitutes an abuse of
2d DCA 1995), and the "'[r]efusal to allow amendment
t would prejudice the opposing
discretion unless it clearly appears that allowing the amendmen
amendment would be futile." Video
party; the privilege to amend has been abused; or
n, 792 So. 2d 680, 681 (Fla. 4th DCA
Independent Medical Examination, Inc. v. City of Westo
DCA 1993)).
2001) (quoting Spradley v. Stick, 622 So. 2d 610, 613 (Fla. 1st
ing counsel but has
5. This case is not set for trial, and undersigned contacted oppos
to this amendment
received no response, as to whether there was any objection
at Ex. A.
6. A Copy of the proposed Amended complaint is attached
PUNITIVE DAMAGES AMENDMENT
laint seeking punitive
7. Additionally, Plaintiff moves to fi le her Amended Comp
damages in this cause.
ges where there is an
8. It is well settled that a jury may award punitive dama
intentional tort involving sexual assault/battery.
dant engages in conduct
9. Punitive damages are available as a remedy if the defen
gross negligence amounting to wanton
that is malicious, oppressive, or committed with such
Company v. Waters, 638 So. 2d 502 (Fla.
disregard for the rights of others. See W.R. Grace &
1994).
damages, the trial court must
10. Before a Plaintiff may assert a claim for punitive
of punitive damages. age Simeon, Inc. v.
determine that there is a reasonable basis for recovery
nable basis can be demonstrated by either a
Cox, 671 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1984). This reaso
or by a proffer of the evidence to come.
presentation of supporting evidence already in the record
Page 2 of 4
EFTA00723581
See Strasser v. Yalamanchi, 677 So. 2d 22 (Pla. 4th DCA 1996).
11. By way of proffer, the evidence that will be presented in this case is that
Defendant Epstein committed sex acts, and other criminal acts, against Plaintiff while Plaintiff
was a minor. These acts were malicious and evidencing wanton disregard for her rights. More
specifically, the evidence will show that Defendant sought out underprivileged and economically
disadvantaged minor females, including Plaintiff, and preyed upon them to satisfy him sexually.
He achieved his goal of converting these minors, including Plaintiff, into personal prostitutes for
him and influenced them away from a typical adolescent lifestyle. At the time Defendant
Epstein was committing these criminal sex acts against Plaintiff he did so with intent to injure
Plaintiff or otherwise with complete disregard for the high likelihood that his acts would result in
injury to Plaintiff
12. Plaintiff's claim for Punitive Damages is further supported at this time by the
following record evidence being filed contemporaneous with this Motion:
a. Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein (Ex. B);
b. Deposition of Fi x. C);
c. Deposition of Palm Beach Police Chief Reiter (Ex. D);
d. Interrogatory responses of Plaintiff, (Ex. E);
13. Plaintiffs claim for Punitive Damages is further supported because Defendant
invoked his 5th amendment right to remain silent and from which adverse inferences against
Defendant should be drawn, and the deposition testimony of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (Ex. B),
wherein he was questioned about the crimes he committed against and other minor victims,
to which he invoked his right against self-incrimination.
14. Therefore, Plaintiff moves to amend the complaint, by adding a count for Battery
Page 3 of 4
EFTA00723582
and for punitive damages.
15. In compliance with Florida Rule of Civil procedure 1.190(1), this Motion is being
served on Defendant more than 20 days before the hearing on this motion regarding the Punitive
Damages amendment.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable Court enter an Order
allowing Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint, adding a RICO count and to allow
Plaintiff to seek Punitive Damages, and for any further relief this Court finds just and necessary.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished by U. S.
Mail, postage prepaid, this L day of1)C , 1.609 to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., 250 Australian
Avenue, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., 250 Australian Avenue
South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike, 303
Banyon Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.
Florida Bar No.: 089737
Page 4 of 4
EFTA00723583
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO: 502008CA0373159ODOCIEB
AB
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING SUPPLEMENTAL
ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S FIRST
SET OF INTERROGATORIES DATED DECEMBER 18, 2008
COMES NOW, Plaintiff M, by and through her undersigned counsel, pursuant to
Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files this her Notice of Serving Answers to Defendant
JEFFREY EPSTEIN's First Set of Interrogatories dated December 18, 2008.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
. . . . _ .
HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished by U. S.
Mail, postage prepaid, this t l day of June, 2009 to: Robert Critton, Jr., Esq.,
Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss,
P.A., IIE
LEOPOLD-KUVIN P.A.
B
I .
Flora, a Bar No.: 089737Esq
EFTA00723584
GENERAL OBJECTIONS
1. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's First Interrogatories as a violation of Rule
1.340(a), because with subparts, they exceed the number permitted by law.
2. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's First Interrogatories as overbroad, unduly
burdensome and harassing.
Page 2 of 5
•..
EFTA00723585
PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT
EPSTEIN'S In SET OF INTERROGATORIES
1. What is the name and address of all persons answering or assisting in answering these
interrogatories, and, if applicable, the person's official position or relationship with the party to
whom the interrogatories are directed?
ANSWER:
With counsel from my attorneys.
15. List all dates you allege you were at Mr. Epstein's home in Florida, include date, time
arrived and left, the name(s) of anyone who went with you to the home when you were there, the
time spent with Mr. Epstein and the name(s) and address of any individuals who were present in
the home with Mr. Epstein and you.
ANSWER: Please see the Com taint. I am unsure of the exact day of incident and it was
only one time. accompanied me there. The cab driver
(identity unknown) drove us to Mr. Epstein's borne. Unknown girl in shower.
Jeffrey Epstein. Possible oriental woman in kitchen.
SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER: As best I can recall, the incident happened during the
summertime when I was 14 ears old. This would place
the date during the I do not
remember the exact date or month. The cab that took
me and to Epstein's home came to
my house in the afternoon hours (I do not know the
exact time). We drove to Epstein's home and the only
people present in the home that I was aware of included
--me,Mr:-Epstein;-MINIIM arrortental woman
in the kitchen (who I did not know) and a girl who
stepped out of a sanna/shower (who I do not know).
The girl who stepped out of the shower/sauna looked a
little older and taller than me. I do not know the
addresses for MIME, the oriental woman or
the girl from the shower/sauna. I do not know exactly
bow long I spent at Mr. Epstein's home, but it was
about 1-2 hours. It was still ' t outside when the cab
came to pick up me and
16. State in detail how you came to be at Mr. Epstein's home on each occasion, i.e. did
someone bring you or ask you if you would or wanted to go; if so, state the name and address of
that individual and what he/she told you and the purpose of your visit.
ANSWER: See Complaint and response to interrogatory number 15.
SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER: I came to be at Mr. Epstein's home because
approached me and asked if I a id be
Page 3 of 5
EFTA00723586
interested in malting some money. At the time, I was 14
years old and said "sure." She explained that I would
have to give some guy a massage, and if I were to get
naked I could ge and if I wore my underwear I
would get $175. ould give my
cell phone number to who would call
me. I had t efore this
incident called me on my cell phone and
asked me if I wanted to go and I said yes. She then
came in a taxi and picked me up at my house as
described above. (See Supplemental Response to
Interrogatory number 15). The time described above in
my supplemental response to interrogatory number 15
is the only tgi . ,1r. Epstein's home. I do
not know =INIIIIMMInhome address, but at the
ved
Page 4 of 5
EFTA00723587
•Simme le
. . .
a n urbeferr5t
w' mo
com/briantey 17X 40 eerch 6. IT1'.. t..---- Plil
licht; aniormw.faceThr
.csysk tiegmarist 16420bledoed le ' ' a sitting'', _lit -
, &arc Ulbela t DWI
-t. •iktill. C.
it ,
,' fair' le : ' * #. It) Pr.-...:Te9.4,7
I MI* • mamma... I
4.4.- ..1 Brio n our to the Pain, Beach County Business Development
: :. Ready Committee Meeting.
1.J resterCer DI trot os Foc6o.4. he etaiSeny • Corxwarri • Lex
Spence INNS Wove. they • youth. Do yeti even hum
Hippy Hanoi:tab. eueocoal
MI %that a *melbas De
VrOcrisy et ikrare
gg lean
Brion Seymour Wow, b this to Seth Spercerllein to
whiz pops want% b chide out eon guy%
Seines I .14/ 17•14etwall
Perefdtrah.) to rote Mee DAM& D
Yesterday al Mem
Tbere/thetrintey're Test •
*-µ Somme Kea Thane! Is* hi; if Fir Is!IND li sett4
F`,-% team&
Score: 100% - Yestevkly at Itillain
Mt
I V.tite a conaefil... .1
a iti
Dr you Foto when icos ens.*
Brian Sr/310r Is at a meeting of the Bute Forum of Rahn Bead
a Kon at into We ruebxe fer daddierry ' C°mem • Ws
OW*. M. and St.nd Take So roe
red Itrid eve I
C.iO<..i 2, t' . ,.z.,., DICCEal Acton,
-.6a..rlAnostIO•silliattont nen Monk . . C........Am s...
._-
rgidallir219TS *va m p 8 II.ChM a.%) I !Pi -
EFTA00723588
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
6fa237ffff315d320ac8eb08aac8023eeb97b5143f028a47ca2a4797061e4930
Bates Number
EFTA00723572
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
17
Comments 0