EFTA00214876.pdf

From: To: Subject: RE: Letter to Jay Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:06:16 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi I. — I found one mistake in the letter, which I corrected in your copy below (I referred to the private investigators as detectives in one of the sentences). Also, another girl was approached by private investigators on Sunday. This was a girl who was not identified in the state investigation, but only through the federal investigation. One thing I am concerned about is that, if we indict now, cross-examination will consist of— "and the government told you that if Mr. Epstein is convicted, you are entitled to a large amount of damages, right?" Thank you, I am looking forward to their response. Let me know how things go with Judge Davis, too. From• To: Subject: RE: Letter to Jay Here is the version I am faxing lay this morning. It's nearly identical to your proposed draft. cc File: 071105 Ltr to Lefkowitz.wpd >> From: Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 6:38 PM To: Subject: Letter to Jay Hi M— Here is my proposed letter. I have put Monday's date on it. It is pretty firm, but I think we have to send a clear message that the Office will not tolerate even the slightest variation from the agreement. I also have enclosed the most recent version of the indictment — it is just so pretty, it deserves to see the light of day. cc File: 071105 Ltr to Lefkowitz.wpd >> ' : • indictment.vvpd>> EFTA00214876 EFTA00214877