EFTA00921502.pdf

From: Valeria Chomsky To: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Replacing Max Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 13:52:06 +0000 Forwarded message From: Noam Chomsky Date: Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 3:41 AM Subject: Re: Replaci To: Harry Chomsky Cc: Avi Chomsky , Diana Chomsky I just hope this can all be handled expeditiously, and that Max can be replaced without delay. This situation has been extremely trying for years, as i've explained, increasingly so, and recently even more aggravating with Max's current stand. On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Harry Chomsky wrote: Deborah told me that she thought we made progressduring t e ca . e felt that a useful next step would be a three-way call with herself, me and Max. I'd be comfortable stating my thoughts in such a meeting, in a way that I was not willing to do in today's call -- as you know, the plan for today's call was for Deborah to tell me what's on her mind and for me just to listen. Max had previously suggested that I should find another attorney to help me in a conversation with Deborah. However, since then Max and Deborah have talked to each other and reached agreement on certain ideas, as I'm sure you have heard. Max and I now feel that he can support me in a call with Deborah. I suppose it may depend on how the call goes. If we reach a point where I need separate counsel, we can try the conversation again later once I have gotten myself set up with another lawyer. I remain hopeful that Max and Deborah can help us continue to work toward agreement about who will be my co-trustee, whether you and I join their phone calls directly or just consult with them between calls as we have always done. On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Noam Chomsky < > wrote: Deborah Quinan informed me that she had a phone call with you today, but that there was no progress. She said that you were unwilling to tell her anything about your thoughts on the matter of replacing Max, except that you would be willing to speak about it sometime to Max or to your counsel. Is that an accurate report? I wrote you explaining the circumstances and my wishes about the matter, but as in the case of the other long and detailed letters I've written about these very aggravating matters, I heard nothing back except that you disagreed about the facts, without letting me know what the disagreement is about or the basis for it. As I explained, I would like to bring all of this to a conclusion, and expeditiously. For compelling reasons, which I've explained several times. It's not the way I hoped to be spending my last years. EFTA00921502 " EFTA00921503