📄 Extracted Text (937 words)
From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]>
To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd:
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 21:28:19 +0000
Forwarded message -----
From: Jeffrey E. [email protected]>
Date: Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 5:40 PM
Subject:
To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
I had I known in the beginning what i know now, I would never have gotten involved with ana s issue never !
ever.! . / I have 40 years of experience dealing with the IRS , I never have cheated ,evaded or crafted
ridiculous returns . I am manical in taking carefully crafted thoughtful positions that even if I dont win the
full amount ,( and i have no recollection of any total loss on any position.) . my credibility with the IRS is
unsurpassed. my research is detailed and the case laws are always relevant. Ana is emblematic of my
warning s and advice that continues to go unheeded. . I have repeatedly told you that these girls , all want to
show that they are clever, they have no experience with the rules, money or biz . and always push the envelope
beyond the pale unfortunately usually ending up getting the principal in trouble.. ( sometimes by design ,
but i m sure , not in this case ). For six months I have asked you , her and her gay bookkeeper if there was
something i didn't know , as I found this entire exercise highly unusual. highly after you with the usual voice
of authority telling me in no uncertain terms "what the agent really wants" . I continue to be amazed how you
, bar y, and brad share very strong detailed views without even one day of true experience. I will review with
you the facts on the phone .
2. I can easily ignore the fact that your concern of deductibity of the first 100 million that saved your financial
life. and provided a resurrection of 3 billion dollars of grats that had died is not balanced by the recognition of
what you had received and not then even paid for . Each time you have chosen not to pay what we agreed. or
what has been written by me in many emails BEFORE the transactions are complete. you tell me that tom and
joslins advice is one of the reasons that you feel you shouldn't pay the amount owed writen or agreed. ( this
only happens AFTER you have received the beneifts of course ) you then add the easily refuted argument
that it was Alan's idea. BTW It is and would have been super easy for you to set a meeting if you had chosen
to. you met with brad. there are memos. there are emails ( which you choose not even to look at , for , I can
only assume . for the fear that it is as clear as I suggest it is . ). lets assume that i show you alan had minuscule
input,at the very end . way after the fact , no invovlement in the crafting of the idea - to a transaction that saved
your family 600 million dollars. or that in fact the first hundred or the full 175 actually now gets you a benefit
that you have been going on about . . what then ?! will there be more reasons that appear why agreed amounts
should not be paid. or are you suggesting we going to go through this exercise for its amusement value
3 It seems you have forgotten that you asked for my HELP! . Gigi, Carlyn, audit , gift tax audit audit.
8865, gagosian contract. underpayment of Apollo offshore. tax. now AF and A . - it is wholly unfair that after
I tell you what I will charge , you say , don't worry _ we always work it out, complete the transaction to your
benefit and then and only then you decide not to pay , the refrain I never agreed to your emails or agreed to
follow our agreement which I unilaterally considerd null and void beacuse I did.
4 Frankly, its Harder to ignore the fact that after helping you save millions and millions on the Giacometti.
(including now for the first time , having to record a 5 million dollar loss in my trust . you have even forgotten
EFTA01037549
about the lotus flowers you had promised to deliver and have miraculously not even offered to buy me a lunch
. not sure what is going on. but it is clearly not the normal you.
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01037550
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
724d87f02e4e18c065de7958f62845ce19a9062030cc478b48245b4a1d5e0431
Bates Number
EFTA01037549
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0