EFTA02351509.pdf
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (175 words)
From: Kathy Ruemmler
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 11:32 AM
To: Jeffrey E.
Subject: Re:
Are you nuts? They would never m=ke me US Atty. Yes, I always got along fine with sessions. Re: t=e PAC, that is a
question of campaign finance law -- not sure.
On Jun 2, 2017, at 7:16 AM, Jeffrey E. <=a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]> wrote=
do you think h=s pac could pay the legal expenses.? do you get alo=g with sessions. . ? if asked would you
want t= be us attny, small but not zero chance
=div>
please not=
The information contained in this communication is
confidential= may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, a=d is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property ofJEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or=any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have=received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and
destroy this communication a=d all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights r=served
EFTA_R1_01329850
EFTA02351509
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
731b39bd67d16ebe755fd77841d8835c254f71cf5f0f084589cedfacd230d001
Bates Number
EFTA02351509
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0