📄 Extracted Text (397 words)
From: "M=, (USANYS)" alMIE>
To: " SANYS)" I SANYS "
SANYS" '
(USANYS "
SANYS"
(USANYS)"
Cc: SaLISS)" (USANYS)"
Subject: Epstein FOIA Update
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 23:21:46 +0000
All,
I'm writing to bring everyone up to speed in the Epstein FOIA. We had a pretty rough, approximately 2 hour oral argument
today before Judge Engelmayer. It may be easier to share the transcript (which I have same-day ordered and will circulate
once received) and/or to talk things through on a call. In sum, the Court is very skeptical of the breadth of the 7(A)
withholdings here and will enter an Order on Monday directing that the withheld documents be produced to the Court for
in camera review. In connection with that, the Court will direct that any material withheld under 7(A) in connection with
the Tartaglione case be specifically marked out as such (as compared to the broader set of material withheld on account
of its likelihood of interference with Noel). Basically, the Court has concerns that too much has been withheld on the
theory of interference with the criminal cases and will undertake its own assessment of the withholding of the
documents.
The Court was also interested in exactly how much of the withheld materials have been produced to the Noel defendants
under Rule 16, and it sounds like it will ask us to make specific representations about precisely which documents have
been produced in Noel.
Also, as you will see from the transcript, the Court directed that I communicate to Audrey that he wants her to consider
this case and to evaluate whether it is necessary to confer with Main Justice on the FOIA response here (specifically
whether more documents might be produced on reconsideration). In particular, the Court perceived a possibility that the
recent change in administration could have some bearing on this. I plan to communicate this to Audrey as soon as we
have the transcript (I've asked for that piece of it tonight).
As noted I will follow up once I have the transcript and will also circulate the Court's Order when it comes out on Monday.
I think it would probably make sense to have a call thereafter and will circulate an invite for early next week. I am also
available to speak over the weekend if anyone would like to talk sooner.
Thanks,
Assistant United States Attorney
EFTA00102650
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
73c31c62b442cff868e5280bb5c05848618dcd9fe0c1b99f915e82a7679fb240
Bates Number
EFTA00102650
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0