EFTA01385959.pdf

27 March 2015 US Fixed Income Weekly Whither the dollar> The bigger issue for the economy and the financial markets Figure 5: Dollar strength will weigh is the dollar. To be sure, the Fed is worried about its recent appreciation, which on net exports for the foreseeable has been the fifth fastest on record. It has been eclipsed only by the moves in 1981-1982, 1984-1985, 1997 and 2008-2009. In the case of the two 1980$ future episodes, high real interest rates, which were induced by tight monetary policy, to %99y were the root cause of dollar appreciation. In 1997, the surge was due to the abandonment of fixed currencies in the Asian bloc. The most recent previous period of dollar strength occurred during the global financial crisis, which resulted in a massive flight to safety into US Treasury securities. The current period is different: The US economy is arguably the healthiest of the major industrialized economies, and the Fed is still expected to raise interest rates this year. Other central banks such as the BOJ and ECB are at different stages of the business cycle and are both pursuing expansionary monetary policies designed to weaken their exchange rates. 15 12 1975 199) 1565 1993 1995 2003 2005 2010 2015 .*& Lead nad.von.Vile• oat**. NV a0901'.) In order to gauge the implications of the strengthening dollar for monetary policy, we simulated a one-time, 14% shock to the trade-weighted dollar (the $00.0• FM SEA [Surat, Sen fittest* current move from last summer) in the Federal Reserve Board's macroeconomic model of the US economy, often just referred to as FRB/US. All else being equal, the simulated shock causes real GDP growth to decrease Figure 6: The collapse in oil prices by about -0.5 percentage points (or 50 basis points) and -0.8 percentage points, points to a sharp pullback in energy respectively, one and two years after the shock occurs. This is also broadly consistent with what we found when we estimated the impact of the change capex in the dollar on the contribution of net exports in the GDP accounts. As we ice %yoy %yoy 550 illustrate in the accompanying chart, changes in the trade-weighted dollar tend to impact net exports with a lag of approximately two years. When the dollar 00 25 strengthens, net exports tend to weaken as US manufacturers' prices become 20 less competitive in the global marketplace and imported goods become 0 relatively cheaper. In the process, domestic production and employment -20 suffers. The opposite is the case when the dollar weakens. Hence, a stronger 00 dollar can effectively act as a monetary tightening. This is partly why the Fed recently "shallowed out" its trajectory for interest rates over the next few .103 40 20)1 2003 20055 2007 2039 2011 2013 years; the other reason being the Fed's lower estimate of the NAIRU. Wil cniO4 col {2q — Pettokum t. re+ vel QS, structure.Iftl •CIOMMOI/1 At the same time, the strengthening dollar will weigh on US inflation: s.a.e. amiss, NA Ann Anasci Dam** Sirs Anse. Domestic producers will be forced to keep their prices as internationally competitive as possible as the cost of imported goods declines. We can see in the nearby chart that when the dollar rises, import prices decline, and when Figure 7: Import prices are likely to import prices fall, consumer goods prices tend to weaken. According to our weaken further in the months ahead FRB/US simulations, the recent dollar appreciation could subtract a tenth or 125 %yov more off of core consumer prices over the next couple of years. This may not seem like much, but core inflation has been running significantly below the Iso Fed's 2% target for the past three years. For inflation to rise toward that level, 75 either dollar strength will have to reverse, or services prices will have to rise 0 further, thereby offsetting the former. Given our expectation of a further significant decline in the unemployment rate, services prices, which are .75 dominated by the cost of labor, should increase further, effectively negating .,to dollar strength. Services prices account for roughly 75% of core CM inflation Cornionom • -005 •220 compared to just 25% for goods. 2034 X05 :we 2010 1012 1011 #••.•--,.." , "1, bad t.•1•^•••••1•4 irrtNear trOas ol 050,2m Awl •I Don't forget oil micas. An important caveat to the above analysis is that the Sane MI NS Haw N-ASA o,tsae &let Resiwth appreciation of the dollar has been accompanied by a collapse in oil prices to below $50 per barrel, which has been a significant stimulant to US households and non-energy related businesses. We estimate that the decline in energy prices has lifted US household cash flow by approximately $140 billion. Another way to see this positive effect is to look at real earnings: Over the past 12 months, real earnings are up 2.4%, the largest increase since October 2009. Last quarter, inflation-adjusted consumer spending rose at a robust 4.2% annualize rate — matching its best quarter of the business cycle — and while recent nominal spending figures for the current quarter have been disappointing, we believe this is mainly due more to weather and the seasonal Page 46 Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0087427 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00233611 EFTA01385959