👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (780 words)
To: [email protected][[email protected]]; Jeffrey [email protected]]
From: Ian Osborne
Sent: Wed 3/14/2012 4:23:43 PM
Subject: Fwd: RE: Investment Letter redline
Jeffrey,
No need to respond to them if you're not participating in this structure.
I shall come back to you on the other email shortly.
Thanks,
Ian
Forwarded messa
From: "Cohen, Jonathan"
Date: Mar 14, 2012 4:06
Subject: RE: Investment Letter redline
To: "Jeffrey Epstein" [email protected]>
Cc: "Ian Osborne" "HORTON, Mark"
"Gladwyn, Henry"
CONFIDENTIAL EMAIL FROM SLAUGHTER AND MAY - THIS EMAIL AND ANY
ATTACHMENT MAY BE PRIVILEGED
Jeffrey,
The concept of being permanently incapacitated is just one limb of the paragraph you
highlighted. In practice, limb (2) of that same paragraph of the Investment Letter is
what would be used in the scenarios you described below. This states that there will be
a return of funds to the Investor, in accordance with the terms of the Investment Letter,
when a medical practitioner provides a written opinion that each director is physically or
mentally incapable of acting as a director and may remain so for 3 months.
Have you had a chance to consider whether the new insertions in respect of the
concept of "Material Breach" in the penultimate paragraph are acceptable to you?
Kind regards,
Jonathan
Jonathan Cohen
EFTA_R1_00490974
EFTA01996365
Slaughter and May
Fax
Fax
From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:ieevacationeomailcom)
Sent: 14 March 2012 15:44
To: Cohen, Jonathan
Cc: Ian Osborne
Subject: Re: Investment Letter redline
what in ods name does the phrase becomes
.. mean did the coma come on , immediately„ can he still
blink his eyes to indicate sell, how long is permanently? and when do you know? , if it came on
slowly , does that not violate the immediate provison. , this is goofy, to put it mildly
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Cohen, Jonathan
wrote:orry„ this siliness is enhance by the need fora ture prediction
CONFIDENTIAL EMAIL FROM SLAUGHTER AND MAY - THIS EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENT MAY BE
PRIVILEGED
Jeffrey,
As requested by Ian, attached above is a clean version of the Investment Letter along with a
redline against the version we sent to you on 7 February 2012. The key amendment
requested by Solina's lawyers was to insert a concept of material breach into the
Investment Letter. We have included wording into the penultimate paragraph, entitled
"Transfer Terms", to address this request and to deal, as far as possible, with the issues
of subjectivity and triviality inherent in providing for breach without the concept of
materiality. Please let us know whether or not you are comfortable with this drafting - we
are happy to have a short call if you have any concerns.
You will also see from the redline that there have been a number of less
significant amendments incorporated into the investment letter in response to points
raised by Solina's lawyers; we would not expect that these would cause you
concern, but should you wish to discuss any of them please let us know.
Kind regards,
Jonathan
EFTA_R1_00490975
EFTA01996366
Jonathan Cohen
Slau hter and Ma
From: Ian Osborne [mailto
Sent: 13 March 2012 02:32
To: Jeffrey Epstein
Cc: HORTON, Mark; Cohen, Jonathan; Gladwyn, Henry
Subject: Investment Letter redline
Jeffrey,
Good to see you this evening.
As discussed, the only change Solina's lawyers requested is a provision for material breach.
Jonathan or Henry will send you the redline Investment Letter with the language that we arc
comfortable with — in defining material breach and the chain of events should it occur. Since it
is hard to argue against the inclusion of any material breach clause, we have sought language
that protects us from anything trivial or subjective.
Hopefully this is OK with you.
Best wishes,
Ian
SLAUGHTER AND MAY,
For more information, go to www.slauehterandmay.com
TEL: FAX:
Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Firm SRA number
55388
A list of partners is available for inspection at the above address
EFTA_R1_00490976
EFTA01996367
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
SLAUGHTER AND MAY, London EC1Y 8YY
For more information. go to www.slaughterandmay.com
TEL: FAX:
Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Firm SRA number
55388
A list of partners is available for inspection at the above address
EFTA_R1_00490977
EFTA01996368
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
73d95a8bbff9813c0e6a548a709e8e72278246dd1ce4e775d5535c45756d6daa
Bates Number
EFTA01996365
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
4
💬 Comments 0