podesta_email_20713.txt

podesta-emails 4,930 words email

P17 D6 P22 V11 D8

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *[image: Inline image 1]* *Correct The Record Tuesday August 26, 2014 Afternoon Roundup:* *Tweets:* *Correct The Record *@CorrectRecord: #WomensEqualityDay <https://twitter.com/hashtag/WomensEqualityDay?src=hash> pic.twitter.com/IHb2tKeh9C <http://t.co/IHb2tKeh9C> [8/26/14, 11:27 a.m. EDT <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/504289078423351297>] *Correct The Record *@CorrectRecord: In the Senate, @HillaryClinton <https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton> promoted energy efficiency in federal buildings #HRC365 <https://twitter.com/hashtag/HRC365?src=hash> http://correctrecord.org/hillary-clinton-protecting-the-environment/ … <http://t.co/HWlR9gKUBN> [8/25/14, 4:06 p.m. EDT <https://twitter.com/CorrectRecord/status/503996981086552064>] *Headlines:* *Washington Post blog: Plum Line: “Hillary Clinton isn’t talking about Ferguson. That’s not a bad thing.” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/08/26/hillary-clinton-isnt-talking-about-ferguson-thats-not-a-bad-thing/>* “To be clear, I’m not saying Clinton shouldn’t weigh in if she has something to say. By all means, she should. But we also shouldn’t act as though we’ve been deprived of something vital if she doesn’t.” *Washington Post blog: She The People: “Will Al Sharpton become a thorn in Hillary Clinton’s side?” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2014/08/26/will-al-sharpton-become-a-thorn-in-hillary-clintons-side/>* “Sharpton and Clinton go way back, or rather, Sharpton and the Clintons go way back. And Sharpton’s move, and efforts to get Clinton on the record on Ferguson, now a catchall for race and civil rights, can in many ways be traced back to Bill Clinton’s first presidential campaign.” *The Hill blog: Twitter Room: “MSNBC host: 'Bizarre' Clinton hasn't made Ferguson statement” <http://thehill.com/blogs/twitter-room/215985-msnbc-host-bizarre-clinton-hasnt-made-ferguson-statement>* “MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Tuesday tweeted it’s “bizarre” that Hillary Clinton has not weighed in on the situation in Ferguson.” *Portland Press Herald (M.E.): “Clinton to stump for Michaud as gubernatorial contest ramps up” <http://www.pressherald.com/2014/08/26/clinton-to-stump-for-michaud-as-gubernatorial-contest-ramps-up/>* “Former President Bill Clinton will campaign with Democratic gubernatorial candidate U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud in Portland next week.” *The Star-Ledger (N.J.) column: Paul Mulshine: “A foreign-policy debate has finally begun; where will Chris Christie end up?” <http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2014/08/a_real_debate_on_foreign_policy_has_finally_begun_but_where_will_chris_christie_end_up_mulshine.html>* Clinton was secretary of state during Obama’s first term, so she shares some of the blame. One leading contender for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination is trying to take advantage of that. *CNN: “In South Carolina, Rubio heals wounds on the right” <http://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/26/politics/rubio-sc-fundraiser/index.html?hpt=po_c1>* “He [Sen. Rubio] did take a moment to bash Hillary Clinton, the putative Democratic frontrunner. ‘She is responsible for at least four of the six years of this disastrous foreign policy,’ he said. ‘She was the secretary of state, the chief foreign policy officer of the Obama administration at a time when it is now universally accepted that his policy is a fiasco.’” *Articles:* *Washington Post blog: Plum Line: “Hillary Clinton isn’t talking about Ferguson. That’s not a bad thing.” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/08/26/hillary-clinton-isnt-talking-about-ferguson-thats-not-a-bad-thing/>* By Paul Waldman August 26, 2014, 12:16 p.m. EDT Are you dying to hear what Hillary Clinton has to say about the events in Ferguson, MO? A lot of people seem to be. Here’s an article in Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/hillary-clinton-ferguson-110301.html> about the fact that she ignored a reporter’s question about it at a book signing.Here’s a CNN panel <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRIjwF-UBdc&feature=youtu.be> discussing her silence. Here’s a Huffington Post article <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/19/hillary-clinton-ferguson_n_5691497.html> on the same topic. There’s an assumption here that deserves examination, one articulated by Al Sharpton last week. “This is now a national, central issue, and anyone running for president needs to come up with a formula, or, in my opinion, they forfeit their right to be taken seriously,” Sharpton said. “I’m amazed that we’re not hearing from leading candidates … Chris Christie or Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton.” Raise your hand if you think that Clinton, not to mention Christie, Bush, or anybody else thinking about running for president, has something particularly profound or insightful to add, a comment that would make the millions who heard it say, “That’s fascinating — I hadn’t thought about it that way, and this really changes my perspective on the issue.” Anyone? Obviously, we don’t want presidential candidates to just skate by without having to take a stand on important controversies. But if we’re going to say that candidates have to “weigh in” on a topic, then there ought to be a reason, beyond the simple fact that they might be running. There’s no shortage of people talking about this subject already, after all. Here are some good reasons why we should demand that candidates talk about a particular topic. Perhaps it’s an issue they’ve been vocal about, or involved in, before. For instance, Jeb Bush wrote a book about immigration reform, so he should be asked about the current immigration controversies. Hillary Clinton worked on health care reform in the 1990s, so it’s worth knowing what she thinks about the state of Affordable Care Act implementation. Or perhaps it’s an issue that the next president will have to deal with, like the situation in Iraq and Syria. It most likely won’t be resolved in the next two years, and we should know what each candidate’s perspective on it is. Or perhaps there’s an issue of federal law, like the controversy over tax inversions, and we want to get them on record now so we can understand what actions they might take. Or perhaps they bring a unique perspective to it; as the only female (possible) candidate, Hillary Clinton can speak to issues like discrimination in the workplace in a way other candidates might not be able to. But Ferguson doesn’t fall into any of those categories. While it has brought up the issue of the militarization of law enforcement, the most important issue at hand is the way Americans of color are treated by police all over the country. That’s a deep and widely distributed problem, and it isn’t one Congress can just pass a law to fix. You could argue Clinton has a special obligation to comment on Ferguson because it’s of such vital importance to African-Americans, and the Clintons’ political careers have been built in no small part on their support from those voters. There’s some merit to that, but the truth is that it’s Bill Clinton who got where he did with the help of such strong support from African-Americans. In 2008, the fact that Hillary Clinton wasn’t able to hold on to them in the face of the challenge from Barack Obama was one of the main reasons she lost. No Democratic candidate can win the party’s presidential nomination without black voters, and every Democrat with their eyes on the White House should be taking every opportunity they can to communicate to those voters that they understand their struggles and appreciate their concerns. But that’s a reason why it would be politically wise for Clinton to talk about Ferguson, not a reason why she has more of a moral obligation to do so than anyone else. To be clear, I’m not saying Clinton shouldn’t weigh in if she has something to say. By all means, she should. But we also shouldn’t act as though we’ve been deprived of something vital if she doesn’t. *Washington Post blog: She The People: “Will Al Sharpton become a thorn in Hillary Clinton’s side?” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2014/08/26/will-al-sharpton-become-a-thorn-in-hillary-clintons-side/>* By Nia-Malika Henderson August 26, 2014, 12:55 p.m. EDT When prominent African Americans activists and intellectuals criticized President Obama on what they viewed as his slow-footed and passionless response to the shooting of an unarmed teen in Ferguson, Mo. and the unrest that followed, the Rev. Al Sharpton was not among them. In fact, Sharpton had a different question: What Hillary Clinton’s response to Ferguson? So far, Clinton, on a book tour centered on foreign policy, hasn’t said anything about Ferguson, but Sharpton said that she, along with other possible 2016ers, should weigh in. “I’m in the smoking-out business. That’s what King did with Kennedy,” he said. “That’s what civil rights leaders do. And I’m doing what I do.” It was a clever political pivot that deflected attention from Obama and spawned additional segments on MSNBC, several articles and tweet after tweet, with Clinton characterized as MIA on race and police brutality, topics du jour among progressives and potential presidential candidate Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). Sharpton and Clinton go way back, or rather, Sharpton and the Clintons go way back. And Sharpton’s move, and efforts to get Clinton on the record on Ferguson, now a catchall for race and civil rights, can in many ways be traced back to Bill Clinton’s first presidential campaign. In 1992, Bill Clinton boldly chose the Rainbow Push convention, where rapper Sistah Souljah was on the schedule, to criticize both the singer and the Rev. Jesse Jackson. At the time, Sharpton was working for Jackson, as the director of the ministers division for the organization. The Souljah-Jackson slam was part of Bill Clinton’s effort to appeal to white blue collar voters, long suspicious of the civil rights movement. In politics, memories and grievances don’t fade easily. And that context and juxtaposition — the Clintons on one side and some civil rights leaders like Jackson and Sharpton on the other–still hang over the Clinton-Sharpton relationship. “I have a cordial relationship with her. When she was the senator here, she would come speak at National Action Network conferences. We got along well,” Sharpton said in a telephone interview. “But civility and cordiality have nothing do with position. There is going to me on the side of civil rights and others on the side of war.” Sharpton says that he hasn’t heard from Hillary or Bill Clinton on Ferguson or much else, even as she seeks to firm up her support among African Americans in advance of a potential 2016 White House bid. “I’ve run into them, but we haven’t had any in-depth talks,” he said. “But I’m sure we will.” The Clinton-Sharpton tango, playing out now on MSNBC against the backdrop of Ferguson and a potential Clinton 2016 bid, raises these questions: Is Sharpton’s power and relevance real or symbolic? And, more broadly what’s Clinton’s next move on Ferguson and on race more broadly? First, Sharpton. Obama’s advisors clearly believe that having Sharpton as an ally is important, something they realized during the 2008 campaign, when they essentially struck a non-aggression pact with him. And given that his show is beamed into the homes of hundreds of thousands of African Americans, his voice does resonate with a segment of the population that that will be key to Clinton’s electoral fortunes. But, is his footprint overstated, especially among the younger social media set, and the bloggers and intellectuals who write about race, culture and politics and also reach a broad audience? Brittney Cooper, a prominent writer at Salon, wrote a piece called, “Al Sharpton does not have my ear. Why we need new black leadership now.” “Al Sharpton, however, does not have the ear of this generation, and it is not his leadership that any of us who will live on the planet for the next half-century or so really needs. To be clear, I do not believe in the slaying of elders. Black cultural traditions hold within them a serious reverence for the authority and wisdom of elder people. “This is not about Sharpton’s age, but rather about how he has positioned himself in relationship to black politics. My issue with him resides squarely within the limitations of his moral and political vision for who and how black people get to be within the American body politic.” If Ferguson revealed Sharpton’s continued prominence and limitations, it also revealed the paucity of black leadership more broadly. Obama’s election was predicted to usher in a new class of black leaders, but that simply has not happened. Hillary Clinton might not have said anything on Ferguson, but Sen. Cory Booker’s (D-N.J.) response, centered around the treatment of protesters, didn’t break through either. Obama left Sharpton’s “black leader” label intact and in some ways elevated it. Clinton could be facing a generation of social media savvy black voters and other media types who are tired of the idea of a designated “black leader,” possibly let down by Obama, and who are looking for a more up-front examination and response to racism. Though Clinton has a strong record on race–one of her first speeches after she left the State Department was about voting rights–the 1992 Sistah Souljah moment shows that often, among centrist Democrats, black issues have been viewed as an expendable liability, even as black voters are crucial. In his way, Obama has had subtle Sistah Souljah moments throughout his presidency around race, but black voters supported him as he walked that tightrope. Should Clinton run, she might have Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on one side and Sharpton on another, all while trying to stake out a middle road filled with blue-collar white voters, long since tired of Obama. It’s a political trick-bag, with no easy answer, a daunting task for even the most savvy campaigner. If Clinton runs, Sharpton seems set to pitch a tent on her left, a quasi-campaign that she would have to contend with as racial dramas keep flaring up. “We cannot have the party go back to the center,” Sharpton said. “And we can’t have Rand Paul talking about Ferguson and race and not Hillary Clinton, when she is the senator from the state where the [Eric Garner] chokehold case was. There is always been a battle in the Democratic party for which way the party is going. It’s an old fight. There will be flashpoints and she will have to deal with them.” *The Hill blog: Twitter Room: “MSNBC host: 'Bizarre' Clinton hasn't made Ferguson statement” <http://thehill.com/blogs/twitter-room/215985-msnbc-host-bizarre-clinton-hasnt-made-ferguson-statement>* By Rebecca Shabad August 26, 2014, 12:50 p.m. EDT MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Tuesday tweeted it’s “bizarre” that Hillary Clinton has not weighed in on the situation in Ferguson. *MSNBC’s Christopher Hayes* @chrislhayes: It is downright bizarre that Hillary Clinton hasn't at least issued a statement on Mike Brown. [8/26/14, 9:22 a.m. EDT <https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/statuses/504257570799091712>] Several news outlets reported the former secretary of State dodged two reporters’ questions about Ferguson at a book signing in the Hamptons last weekend. After Clinton signed more than 700 books at a store in Westhampton Beach, two reporters asked her to react to the unrest in Missouri, according to CNN. Clinton, the likely Democratic front-runner for president if she runs in 2016, ignored their questions and left the bookstore, reports said. In addition to Hayes’ comment, Rev. Al Sharpton, another host on MSNBC, said at a Ferguson rally earlier this month, "Jeb Bush, Hillary Clinton, don’t get laryngitis on this issue…Nobody can go to the White House unless they stop by our house and talk about policing.” The civil rights activist has been heavily engaged in Ferguson protests since the fatal police shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown on Aug. 9. President Obama has weighed in on the case multiple times and sent Attorney General Eric Holder to Ferguson last week to meet with residents and Brown’s family. *Portland Press Herald (M.E.): “Clinton to stump for Michaud as gubernatorial contest ramps up” <http://www.pressherald.com/2014/08/26/clinton-to-stump-for-michaud-as-gubernatorial-contest-ramps-up/>* By Steve Mistler August 26, 2014, 9:43 a.m. EDT Former President Bill Clinton will campaign with Democratic gubernatorial candidate U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud in Portland next week. Clinton will be the top draw at a rally and reception for Michaud at Ocean Gateway. The two-term president has attended similar events for other Democratic candidates seeking high profile seats. In 2010, Clinton headlined two events for Democratic nominee Libby Mitchell, who eventually finished third in the five-way contest. Nonetheless, Clinton’s visit comes as the current race is expected to increase in intensity. The three major candidates – Michaud, Republican Gov. Paul LePage and independent Eliot Cutler – have been campaigning for over a year. However, state elections here tend not to grab the public’s attention until after Labor Day, the unofficial end of summer. The event at Ocean Gateway begins at 8 p.m. on Tuesday. Tickets for the event are free, but individuals must RSVP with the Michaud campaign by visiting michaud2014.com/Clinton. *The Star-Ledger (N.J.) column: Paul Mulshine: “A foreign-policy debate has finally begun; where will Chris Christie end up?” <http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2014/08/a_real_debate_on_foreign_policy_has_finally_begun_but_where_will_chris_christie_end_up_mulshine.html>* By Paul Mulshine August 26, 2014, 11:15 a.m. EDT A couple of things happened over the past week in the area of foreign policy. One was the position of Washington’s deep thinkers and diplomatic geniuses on the Syrian civil war: They’re switching sides. The other was the position of the two political parties on the interventionism that created the mess in the Mideast. They seem to be switching sides as well. And that promises to cause a lot of problems for a certain New Jersey governor who so clearly wants to be the Republican candidate in the 2016 presidential election. To the extent he has commented on foreign policy, Chris Christie has seemed to stick to the mainstream Republican position, a position that is as crazy as the man who most loudly promotes it, John McCain. McCain has spent the past couple of years baying for the United States to topple Syrian strongman Bashar Assad. In this, he’s been joined by the equally out-of-touch Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina senator who has a habit of saying things like "Absolutely, you’ve got to get on the ground" in Syria — without evincing the slightest knowledge that the ground in question tends to be filled with Islamic fundamentalists who hate the U.S. Last week we got a graphic example of just what these characters have in mind for both Syria and neighboring Iraq. It took the video of that beheading of an American journalist to make the Beltway Republicans understand what has been evident since the 2003 Iraq invasion: The Washington crowd is uniquely unqualified to sort out the internal politics of the Mideast. But all of the ensuing debacles didn’t stop the politicians and pundits of both parties from telling us it was essential to topple Assad. Now they’re desperately trying to figure out how to wipe out Assad’s toughest enemy, the Islamist radical army called ISIS, or the Islamic State. But the rise of ISIS was entirely predictable. In 2011, a Damascus-based news correspondent named Phil Sands quoted an anonymous official of the ruling Ba’ath Party who predicted it. "Europe and the U.S. are making a strategic mistake," the unnamed official said. "They are trying to hand power to the Islamic movements that will be waging war against them in 10 years from now." It turns out that guy was an optimist. It took only three years. The Democrats share equally in the blame, as Hillary Clinton proved when she took the same tack as McCain and Graham in accusing President Obama of failing to do enough to help the so-called "moderate" opposition overthrow Assad. It’s a little late in history to believe in Mideastern moderates who magically rise to power the moment a dictator is deposed. In Iraq, the fall of Saddam Hussein led directly to the rise of an Iranian-allied Shi’a-majority government that repressed the Sunni minority. This cleared the way for ISIS to rise in the Sunni areas of Iraq. And then there’s Libya, where U.S. airstrikes helped topple Moammar Gadhafi. Islamic militants moved into the vacuum. They took the Tripoli airport the other day and are threatening to make ISIS-style gains. Clinton was secretary of state during Obama’s first term, so she shares some of the blame. One leading contender for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination is trying to take advantage of that. On "Meet the Press" Sunday, Rand Paul warned that Clinton might get us into yet another Mideast war if elected president. "If you want to see a transformational election in our country, let the Democrats put forward a war hawk like Hillary Clinton, and you’ll see a transformation like you’ve never seen," the Kentucky senator said. This represented a moment we haven’t seen since the Cold War days: an actual debate between Democrats and Republicans on foreign policy. Until now, the candidates of both parties backed what the Republicans call "neoconservatism" and the Democrats call "liberal internationalism." But polls show the public is fed up with foreign wars, no matter how noble the alleged motives. So the coming debates could be a real challenge for Christie, assuming he enters the 2016 race. So far Christie has been mouthing the standard attacks on Obama’s supposed failure to lead. But soon enough he will have to start telling us just where he would lead us. Down another blind alley? We will soon find out, I suspect. ADD: As far back as 2004 it was obvious that this debacle was developing. In a column in April 2004, I wrote: “The idea of democracy for Iraq sounds nice. But in a democracy, the majority rules. And a majority of Iraqis are Shi'a Muslims, indistinguishable from the Shi'as next door in Iran. Give them the vote and Iraq may become Iran. We will have spent a couple hundred billion dollars and hundreds of lives to turn the letter ‘q’ into the letter ‘n.’” That happened right on schedule. Another thing I predicted that year also occurred on schedule: ‘A democratic Mideast would almost certainly be taken over by the same Islamic fundamentalists we are trying to suppress.’ The only other conservative columnist that I know of who noticed this was Pat Buchanan. As for the rest, they were taken in by those liberal internationalists posing as ‘neo’ conservatives. I also noticed that 10 years ago: ‘With a few exceptions, conservative pundits have failed to notice that Bush has gone over to the liberal side on this question, also known as the Wilsonian side. To put it in historic terms, conservatives in 2000 thought they were voting for George W. Bush. Instead they got Woodrow Wilson.’ Or in other words, they got a former governor of New Jersey with an alliterative name and a liberal internationalist view of foreign policy - but a distinct lack of skill in that field. Do they need another? That's up to Chris Christie. And it should be great fun to watch. *CNN: “In South Carolina, Rubio heals wounds on the right” <http://edition.cnn.com/2014/08/26/politics/rubio-sc-fundraiser/index.html?hpt=po_c1>* By Peter Hamby August 26, 2014 Anderson, South Carolina (CNN) -- Marco Rubio came to South Carolina this week hoping to win over the kind of conservative hardliners who turned on him last year as the Senate immigration reform bill he sponsored hit a roadblock in the Republican-controlled House. By the time Rubio addressed a massive GOP fundraiser here on Monday evening, it wasn't his right flank he had to worry about. The Florida senator and likely presidential candidate was the headline speaker at a "Faith and Freedom" barbecue fundraiser for Rep. Jeff Duncan, the tea party-backed congressman who represents what many Republicans consider the most conservative House district in the state. After a succession of speeches from South Carolina Republican notables like Sen. Lindsey Graham and Gov. Nikki Haley, Rubio took the stage in Anderson to applause, but was quickly interrupted by a group of protestors -- self-identified DREAMers, young immigrants brought to the country illegally as minors -- who loudly heckled the senator for abandoning last year's sweeping immigration package when it was met with harsh resistance on the right. For an ambitious Republican looking to prove his conservative bona fides and rub out the stain of working with Chuck Schumer and Harry Reid, the interruption was something of a gift. A plugged-in Republican operative turned to a reporter and observed dryly, "I couldn't think of a better way to make Rubio look good in South Carolina." The audience of nearly 1,200 conservatives jeered the protestors as Rubio waited for them to be escorted out of the Anderson Civic Center, scolding them in the process. "We are a sovereign country that deserves to have immigration laws," Rubio said. "You're doing harm to your own cause because you don't have a right to illegally immigrate to the United States." The crowd cheered him on. One elderly audience member shoved a protester as he weaved his way through the tables. Another, 73-year old Army veteran Turk Culberson, angrily stalked them out of the building, clutching his cane as if it were a baseball bat. "I let my temper get the better of me," Culberson said after the incident. "But there was no place for that kind of thing. If you don't want to hear what he has to say, don't come." The remainder of Rubio's speech cemented his standing with the deeply Republican crowd. A member of the Senate Foreign Relations and Intelligence committees, Rubio has championed a muscular foreign policy and tapped hawkish neoconservative thinkers as his foreign policy advisers. He spent much of the evening lambasting President Barack Obama's handling of overseas affairs, from the Middle East to Asia. "If you want to know the state of the world today, it is chaos," he said. He pivoted to cultural issues, blasting tax laws that discourage marriage and a culture that regards divorce as no big deal. "The most important job we have is no congressman or senator or governor," he said. "It's family and mother and husband and wife." Though several attendees said they had lingering questions about his immigration stance and wanted to hear more from him in the coming months, most of the Republicans who spoke to CNN complimented his speech. "That crowd was with him 100%," said MaryAnn Riley, a longtime member of the Spartanburg County Republican Women. Riley, though, cautioned that she was open to supporting other potential Republican presidential candidates, naming Rick Perry and even former GOP nominee Mitt Romney as possible choices. Duncan, who fiercely opposed Rubio's immigration efforts in 2013, said the senator "will have to explain" his position to South Carolinians if he seeks the GOP nomination. But Duncan had kind words for the man who graced his fundraiser. "Marco Rubio believes in faith and freedom," he said. Graham, a fellow hawk in the Senate, was more generous in his remarks. He described Rubio as "the son of Ronald Reagan when it comes to national security." Just as important as Rubio's public appearance were the carefully-curated private meetings that his advisers arranged prior to the dinner speech. In his first trip to South Carolina since addressing a GOP fundraiser in Columbia two summers ago, Rubio spent the day in a series of closed-door sessions with influential local activists and potential financial backers, specifically courting the Christian conservatives who dominate grassroots Republican politics in the South Carolina upstate. Rubio advisers organized a meeting for the senator with senior officials from Bob Jones University, making Rubio the first Republican presidential contender to cultivate leaders at the famed Christian university. He also entertained questions from over 40 social conservatives at the Greenville home of Lisa van Riper, the well-connected president of South Carolina Citizens For Life. Tony Beam, the host of a drive-time Christian talk radio show that broadcasts throughout the upstate, said Rubio spoke for 10 minutes about "bedrock conservative values" while at Van Riper's home, stressing his opposition to same-sex marriage, before taking questions. Beam said he was "very moved" by Rubio's remarks, comparing the 43-year old Cuban-American to Ronald Reagan. "I was very impressed with his grasp of the issues," Beam said. "But the thing that impressed me most was his optimism and belief in America, the kind that I first heard from Ronald Reagan when I was a kid in college. That's what I've been searching for. That's something that's missing in conservative messaging today. I was very moved." Rubio, too, held a Greenville fundraiser for his political operation, Reclaim America PAC, which has so far spent half a million dollars on behalf of Republican candidates in 2014. The event attracted donors and business leaders from around the state, as well as another member of the South Carolina congressional delegation, Rep. Trey Gowdy. Still, Rubio brushed off questions about his presidential aspirations in a session with reporters, giving them a pat answer about waiting until after the midterms before making a decision about a White House run. He did take a moment to bash Hillary Clinton, the putative Democratic frontrunner. "She is responsible for at least four of the six yeas of this disastrous foreign policy," he said. "She was the secretary of state, the chief foreign policy officer of the Obama administration at a time when it is now universally accepted that his policy is a fiasco." As for the immigration flare-up earlier in the evening, Rubio stuck to his guns, saying that a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants is impossible without first securing the border and then re-structuring the current immigration system. "I don't know of anyone in Washington who has taken more criticism for supporting elements of what they are asking for," he said. "But what they are asking for and insisting upon is unrealistic. This notion that we are going to pass some kind of blanket amnesty is not realistic." Outside the civic center, one of the immigration hecklers -- Charlotte, North Carolina, resident Oliver Merino -- promised to hound Rubio with similar protests wherever he goes. Merino, a member of the DREAM Organizing Network, a group that works to halt immigrant deportations, scoffed at the notion that Rubio could win over Hispanic voters if he secures the Republican nomination. "He wants people like me to be deported," Merino said. "He doesn't stand with our community. We want people to know that. Wherever he goes, we will let him know that."