EFTA01388577
EFTA01388578 DataSet-10
EFTA01388579

EFTA01388578.pdf

DataSet-10 1 page 692 words document
P17 P21 V11 V13 V16
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (692 words)
The limits of monetary policy .64riTttl Ed,t,,r,j ?hoe, 2:ilf; For a multi asset investor, we would suggest focusing on the following four key points. First: be realistic about your returns expectations and how you can achieve them. Lowering returns expectations as part of a desire to better align asset allocation with investment objectives might make sense for some investors (such as those already approaching retirement). Depending on your personal circumstances, the lower expected returns from most financial assets may tempt you instead to some consumption opportunities. Keep in mind, after all, that part of the whole point of OE is to make you spend more in the here and now. But note also the ECB and other central banks' increasing focus on getting QE to work through revitalising the credit channel in economies: increased lending will support economies and help create investment opportunities too. For most investors, the main issue will remain on how to generate acceptable levels of returns with acceptable levels of risk. Second: remember that risk comes in many forms. As we have outlined above, current central bank policy will have a tendency to increase risk in part because lower yields on lower-risk assets can alter investor behavior. In search of higher yielding investment they are forced to buy riskier assets, both in the fixed income space and equities or alternatives. In this way. loose monetary policy can increase the risk of misallocation of capital and bubble formation in financial assets. This is true for fixed income as well as equities. The valuations side of the equation can come into particular focus as investors are willing to take more risk, even if earnings are not able to keep pace with valuations. As always, bear in mind, assuming greater risk is no assurance of greater returns. At the same time as investors are looking for higher returns, multi asset investors are also trying to establish what might be percieved current investment "safe- havens". Effective safe-havens vary over time and between crises and no investment is without risk. Gold. for example, may have proved a good safe haven in some periods in the past, but has been a less effective one in recent years. In other words, the correlations between safe havens and risk assets are not stable and history does not always repeat itself. So, as noted above, some risks accompany holding Treasuries (or Bunds) in an interest rate up-cycle, they do not always lose their appeal. It is also worth remembering that "safe havens" may not be confined to those traditionally perceived as such (e.g. Treasuries, cash and, perhaps, gold). In the current environment, currencies might be seen as a key part of any safe-haven strategy. And, linked to the currency issues, some regions' equities may also offer temporary safe haven status. When considering risk arid safe-havens, it is also worth distinguishing between overall market risks and those which are country- specific emerging markets provide a good example of this. Investors, of course, also need to look beyond seeking higher risk and safe havens and take an overall approach to their own risk profile. As noted above, accepting only as much risk as one has historically budgeted for is likely to result in returns below historical averages. For some people, a better solution might be to increase their risk budgets, especially if they want to take a longer-term perspective, but any increase in risk must be in line with your personal risk composure. Further, you may want to endeavor to limit the downside risk in your portfolio with an appropriate Past performance is not indicative of future returns. No assurance can be given that any forecast, investment objectives and/or expected returns will be achieved. Allocations are subject to change without notice. Forecasts are based on assumptions, estimates, opinions and hypothetical models that may prove to be incorrect.The information herein reflect our current views only, are subject to change, and are not intended to be promissory or relied upon by the reader. There can be no certainty that events will turn out as we have opined herein. CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0092213 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00238397 EFTA01388578
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
7d122add9d8aa9e5c70f87e60cf2f89fd1bcbd37fc17e4dcd3ccaa020b972ad6
Bates Number
EFTA01388578
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!