gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.79.2.pdf

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT 2  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 2 of 18 United States District Court Southern District Of New York --------------------------------------------------X .. .. Virginia L. Giuffre, ...... ..... Plaintiff, ....... v. 15-cv-07433-RWS ..... ...... Ghislaine Maxwell, ... Defendant. --------------------------------------------------X .... .. ... .. DEFENDANT GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS D efend ant,Ghislaine M ax well,by and throu ghheru nd ersigned cou nsel,hereby respond s to P laintiff’s FirstRequ estforP rod u ction of D ocu ments (the “Requ ests” ). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT AND GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. This response is mad e to the bestof M s.M ax well’s presentknowled ge, information and belief.M s.M ax well,throu ghherattorneys of record ,have notcompleted the investigation of the facts relatingto this case,have notcompleted d iscovery in this action,and have notcompleted preparation fortrial.M s.M ax well’s responses to P laintiff’s requ ests are based on information cu rrently known to herand are given withou twaivingM s.M ax well’s right to u se evid ence of any su bsequ ently d iscovered orid entified facts,d ocu ments or commu nications.M s.M ax wellreserves the rightto su pplementthis Response in accord ance withFed .R.C iv.P .26(e). 2. M s.M ax wellobjects to the Requ ests to the ex tentthey attemptto impose any requ irementord iscovery obligation greaterthan ord ifferentfrom those u nd erthe Fed eralRu les of C ivilP roced u re,the localru les of this C ou rtorany O rd ers of the C ou rt. 3. M s.M ax wellobjects to the Requ ests to the ex tentthey seekd ocu ments or information protected by the attorney/clientprivilege,the work-prod u ctd octrine,Ru le 40 8 of the Fed eralRu les of E vid ence,any common interestprivilege,jointd efense agreementorany other applicable privilege.  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 3 of 18 4. M s.M ax wellobjects to the Requ ests to the ex tentthey seekd ocu ments or information ou tsid e of M s.M ax well’s possession,cu stod y orcontrol. 5. M s.M ax wellobjects to the Requ ests to the ex tentthey seekinformation whichis notrelevantto the su bjectmatterof the litigation and /oris notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. 6. M s.M ax wellobjects to the Requ ests to the ex tentthey are overly broad ,u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoying,embarrassing,or harassingM s.M ax well. 7. M s.M ax wellobjects to the Requ ests to the ex tentthey are vagu e and ambigu ou s, orimprecise. 8. M s.M ax wellobjects to the Requ ests to the ex tentthey seekinformation thatis confid entialand implicates M s.M ax well’s privacy interests. 9. M s.M ax wellincorporates by reference every generalobjection setforthabove into eachspecific response setforthbelow.A specific response may repeatageneralobjection foremphasis orforsome otherreason.The failu re to inclu d e any generalobjection in any specific response d oes notwaive any generalobjection to thatrequ est. 10 . The Requ ests seekinformation thatis confid entialand implicates M s.M ax well’s privacy interests.To the ex tentsu chinformation is relevantand d iscoverable in this action,M s. M ax wellwillprod u ce su chmaterials su bjectto an appropriate protective ord erpu rsu antto Fed . R.C iv.P .26(c)limitingtheird issemination to the attorneys and theiremployees. OBJECTIONS TO DEFINITIONS 11. M s.M ax wellobjects to D efinition N o.1 regard ing“A gent”to the ex tentthatit pu rports to ex tend the meaningbeyond those permissible by law. 12. M s.M ax wellobjects to D efinition N o.3 regard ing“D efend ant.”The D efinition is overly broad and u nd u ly bu rd ensome to the ex tentitattempts to ex tend the scope of the Requ ests to d ocu ments in the possession,cu stod y orcontrolof ind ivid u als otherthan M s. M ax wellorhercou nsel. 13. M s.M ax wellobjects to D efinition N o.5 regard ing“E mployee.”M s.M ax wellis an ind ivid u al,su ed in an ind ivid u alcapacity,and therefore there is no “pastorpresentofficer, d irector,agentorservant”of hers.A d d itionally,“attorneys”and “paralegals”are not “employees”of M s.M ax wellgiven thatshe herself is notan attorney and therefore cannot “employ”attorneys. 14. M s.M ax wellobjects to D efinition N o.9 regard ing“Y ou ”or“Y ou r.”The D efinition is overly broad and u nd u ly bu rd ensome to the ex tentitattempts to ex tend the scope of 2  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 4 of 18 the Requ ests to d ocu ments in the possession,cu stod y orcontrolof ind ivid u als otherthan M s. M ax wellorhercou nsel. OBJECTIONS TO INSTRUCTIONS 15. M s.M ax wellobjects to Instru ction N o.1,in particu larthe d efinition of the “RelevantP eriod ”to inclu d e J u ly 1999 to the present,on the grou nd s thatitis overly broad and u nd u ly bu rd ensome and calls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.The C omplaintat paragraph9 pu rports to d escribe events pertainingto P laintiff and D efend antoccu rringin the years 1999 –20 0 2.The C omplaintalso references statements attribu ted to M s.M ax well occu rringin J anu ary 20 15.D efiningthe “RelevantP eriod ”as “J u ly 1999 to the present”is vastly overbroad ,irrelevantand notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence,and as to certain of the Requ ests,is intend ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingor harassingM s.M ax welland itimplicates herprivacy rights.Thu s,M s.M ax wellinterprets the RelevantP eriod to be limited to 1999-20 0 2 and D ecember30 ,20 14 -J anu ary 31,20 15 and objects to prod u ction of any d ocu ments ou tsid e thatperiod ,ex ceptas specifically noted . 16. M s.M ax wellobjects to Instru ction N o.3 on the grou nd s thatitis u nd u ly bu rd ensome and is intend ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s.M ax well. M s.M ax wellcannotpossibly recallthe specific d isposition of d ocu ments,particu larly electronic d ocu ments,d atingbackover16 years.H owever,M s.M ax well,priorto this litigation has long had apractice of d eletingemails afterthey have been read . 17 . M s.M ax wellobjects to Instru ction N os.5,8 ,9,12,17 to the ex tentthey seekto impose obligations to su pply ex planations forthe presence orabsence of su chd ocu ments,to specifically id entify persons ord ocu ments,to provid e information concerningwho prepared d ocu ments,the location of any copies of su chd ocu ments,the id entities and contactinformation forpersons who have cu stod y orcontrolof su chd ocu ments,the reasons forinability to prod u ce portions of d ocu ments,and the “natu ralperson in whose possession they were fou nd ,”beyond the requ irements of Ru le 34.These Instru ctions improperly seekto propou nd Interrogatories pu rsu antto Ru le 33. 18 . M s.M ax wellobjects to Instru ction N o.13 on the grou nd s thatitis u nd u ly bu rd ensome and is intend ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s.M ax well. M s.M ax wellcannotpossibly recallthe specific circu mstances u pon whichad ocu mentd ating back16 years has ceased to ex ist. 19. M s.M ax wellobjects to Instru ction N o.15 to the ex tentthatitcalls ford ocu ments orinformation protected by the attorney/clientprivilege,the work-prod u ctd octrine,orany other applicable privilege. 20 . M s.M ax wellobjects to Instru ctions N os.18 & 19 to the ex tentthey requ ire information on any privilege logabove and beyond the requ irements of L ocalC ivilRu le 26.2. 3  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 5 of 18 SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUESTS FOR PODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Document Request No. 1:A lld ocu ments relatingto commu nications withJ effery E pstein from 1999 –P resent. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad and u nd u ly bu rd ensome and calls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s. M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentitseeks d ocu ments orinformation protected by the attorney/clientprivilege,the work-prod u ctd octrine,the common interestprivilege orany otherapplicable privilege. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellis withhold ing d ocu ments ou tsid e of the RelevantP eriod s d escribed in paragraph15,supra,and is withhold ing prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare privileged pu rsu antto acommon interestagreement. Document Request No. 2:A lld ocu ments relatingto commu nications withV irginiaRoberts Giu ffre from 1999 –present. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any su chd ocu ments. Document Request No. 3:A lld ocu ments relatingto commu nications withA nd rew A lbert C hristian E d ward ,D u ke of Y ork(a.k.a.P rince A nd rew)from 1999 –P resent. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad and calls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentitseeks d ocu ments orinformation protected by the attorney/client privilege,the work-prod u ctd octrine,orany otherapplicable privilege.M s.M ax wellalso objects to this Requ estto the ex tentitimplicates herrightto privacy.Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. Smay,30 2 P .3d 235 (C olo.20 13);Fed .R.E vid .50 1. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellwillprod u ce non- privileged d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estlimited to the RelevantP eriod s d escribed in paragraph15,supra, and withprivate phone nu mbers and related information red acted .M s. M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su chRelevantP eriod s. Document Request No. 4:A lld ocu ments relatingto commu nications between you and J effrey E pstein regard ingany female u nd erthe age of 18 from the period of 1999 –present. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any su chd ocu ments. 4  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 6 of 18 Document Request No. 5:A lld ocu ments relatingto massages,inclu d ingbu tnotlimited to any d ocu ments reflectingrecru itingorhiringmasseu ses,ad vertisingformasseu ses,flyers created for d istribu tion athighschools orcolleges,and record s reflectinge-mails orcalls to ind ivid u als relatingto massages. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any su chd ocu ments. Document Request No. 6:A lld ocu ments relatingto commu nications withany of the following ind ivid u als from 1999 –present:E mmy Taylor,SarahKellen,E vaD u bin,Glen D u bin,J ean L u c B ru nel,and N ad iaM arcinkova. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellis withhold ing prod u ction of d ocu ments relatingto commu nications withN ad iaM arcinkova,SarahKellen and E vaD u bin thatare ou tsid e of the RelevantP eriod s d escribed in paragraph15,supra.M s. M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any su chd ocu ments relatingto M s.M arcinkova,M s.Kellen orM s.D u bin within the RelevantP eriod s.M s.M ax wellalso has been u nable to locate any su ch d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estrelatingto Glen D u bin,J ean L u c B ru nelorE mmy Taylor forany time period . Document Request No. 7:A llvid eo tapes,au d io tapes,photographs orany otherprintor electronic med iarelatingto females u nd erthe age of 18 from the period of 1999 –present. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estwhichrelate orpertain to P laintiff orany of the witnesses id entified by P laintiff in herRu le 26 d isclosu res.M s.M ax wellis withhold ing prod u ction of otherd ocu ments responsive to this Requ est,inclu d ingthings like mainstream newspapers,magazines,vid eos,D V D s orothermed iaorfamily photographs whichcontain d epictions of female child ren,inclu d ingM s.M ax wellherself as achild . 5  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 7 of 18 Document Request No. 8:A lld ocu ments relatingto you rtravelfrom the period of 1999 – present,inclu d ingbu tnotlimited to,any travelon J effrey E pstein’s planes,commercialflights, helicopters,passportrecord s,record s ind icatingpassengers travelingwithyou ,hotelrecord s,and cred itcard receipts. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellalso objects to this Requ estto the ex tentit implicates herrightto privacy.Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. Smay,30 2 P .3d 235 (C olo.20 13); Fed .R.E vid .50 1. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellis withhold ing prod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of the RelevantP eriod s d escribed in paragraph15,supra and is withhold ingd ocu ments within the RelevantP eriod thatare private and are notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. Document Request No. 9:A lld ocu ments id entifyingpassengers,manifests,orflightplans for any helicopterorplane everowned orcontrolled by you orJ effrey E pstein orany associated entity from 1999 –present. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellis withhold ing prod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of the RelevantP eriod s d escribed in paragraph15,supra,and is withhold ingd ocu ments within the RelevantP eriod thatare private and are notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.The d ocu ments reflectingflightplans in M s.M ax well’s possession d o notid entify passengers ormanifests. Document Request No. 10:A lld ocu ments relatingto payments mad e from J effrey E pstein or any related entity to you from 1999 –present,inclu d ingpayments forworkperformed ,gifts,real estate pu rchases,livingex penses,and payments to you rcharitable end eavors inclu d ingthe TerraM arP roject. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad ,u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassing M s.M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. 6  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 8 of 18 Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estd u ringthe RelevantP eriod s as d efined in paragraph15,supra.M s.M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su ch RelevantP eriod s. Document Request No. 11:A lld ocu ments relatingto ord escribingany workyou performed withJ effrey E pstein,orany affiliated entity from 1999 –present. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ estin thatthe terms “work,”“with”and “affiliated entity”are vagu e,u nd efined and su sceptible of mu ltiple meanings and d efinitions. M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad ,u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s.M ax well.M s. M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estd u ringthe RelevantP eriod s as d efined in paragraph15,supra.M s.M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su ch RelevantP eriod s. Document Request No. 12:A llconfid entiality agreements between you and J effrey E pstein or any entity to whichhe is related orinvolved orsu chagreements whichare orwere in you r possession orcontrolrelated to any otheremployee of J effrey E pstein,orany associated entity. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ estin thatthe terms “confid entiality agreements”and “associated entity”are vagu e,u nd efined and su sceptible of mu ltiple meanings and d efinitions.M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ est. Document Request No. 13:A lld ocu ments from you ,you rattorneys oragents to any law enforcemententity,orfrom any law enforcemententity to you orany of you rrepresentatives related to any cooperation,potentialcharge,immu nity ord eferred prosecu tion,orwhichrelates to su spected orknown criminalactivity. 7  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 9 of 18 RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ estas vagu e and confu sing.M s. M ax wellobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentitrequ ests d ocu ments su bjectto eitherthe attorney- clientorworkprod u ctprivileges.M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad ,u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingor harassingM s.M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ est. Document Request No. 14:A lld ocu ments relatingto travelof any female u nd erthe age of 18 from the period of 1999 –present. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ est. Document Request No. 15:A llvid eo tapes,au d io tapes,photographs orany otherprintor electronic med iataken atatime when you were in J effrey E pstein’s company orinsid e any of his resid ences oraircraft. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tent itimplicates herrightto privacy.Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. Smay,30 2 P .3d 235 (C olo.20 13); Fed .R.E vid .50 1. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estthatare within the RelevantP eriod s d escribed in paragraph15,supra. M s.M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su ch RelevantP eriod s. 8  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 10 of 18 Document Request No. 16:A llcompu ters,hard d rives orcopies thereof forallcompu ters in operation between 1999-20 0 2. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of copies of compu ters orhard d rives thatcontain d ocu ments,med iaand otherd ata thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentitimplicates her rightto privacy.Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. Smay,30 2 P .3d 235 (C olo.20 13);Fed .R.E vid .50 1. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any compu ters,hard -d rives orcopies of any compu ters responsive to this Requ est. Document Request No. 17:A lld ocu ments relatingto commu nications withyou and Ross Gow from 20 0 5 –P resent. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellalso objects to this requ estto the ex tentit seeks d ocu ments orinformation protected by the attorney/clientprivilege,the common interest privilege,the work-prod u ctd octrine,orany otherapplicable privilege. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellis withhold ing d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estthatare ou tsid e of the RelevantP eriod s d efined in paragraph15,supra as wellas the period of J anu ary 1,20 11 to D ecember31,20 11,and also withhold ingd ocu ments within the RelevantP eriod s thatare privileged .M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any non-privileged d ocu ments thatare within su chRelevantP eriod s. Document Request No. 18:A llvid eo tapes,au d io tapes,photographs orany otherprintor electronic med iarelatingto V irginiaRoberts Giu ffre. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentitcalls forattorney- clientcommu nications and attorney workprod u ct.M s.M ax wellalso objects to this Requ estto the ex tentitcalls forvid eo tapes,au d io tapes,photographs orany otherprintorelectronic med ia relatingto V irginiaRoberts Giu ffre thatex ists within the pu blic d omain,the internetorin pu blic cou rtrecord s and whichare equ ally available to bothparties and can be obtained from some othersou rce thatis more convenient,less bu rd ensome,and less ex pensive. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ est. 9  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 11 of 18 Document Request No. 19:A lld ocu ments relatingto you rd eposition sched u led in the matter of J ane D oe v.E pstein,0 8 -8 0 8 93,United States Sou thern D istrictof Florid a. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this requ eston the grou nd s thatitseeks d ocu ments orinformation protected by the attorney/clientprivilege,any common interest privilege,and the work-prod u ctd octrine. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellis withhold ing privileged d ocu ments Responsive to this Requ est. Document Request No. 20:A lld ocu ments relatingto any cred itcard s thatwere paid forby Jeffrey E pstein orany related entity from 1999 –present. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls forthe prod u ction of copies of compu ters orhard d rives thatcontain d ocu ments,med iaand otherd ata thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentitimplicates her rightto privacy.Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. Smay,30 2 P .3d 235 (C olo.20 13);Fed .R.E vid .50 1. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ est. Document Request No. 21:A lltelephone record s associated withyou ,inclu d ingcellphone record s from 1999 –present. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome,propou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well,and seeks d ocu ments ou tsid e of M s.M ax well’s possession,cu stod y orcontrol.M s. M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentitimplicates her rightto privacy.Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. Smay,30 2 P .3d 235 (C olo.20 13);Fed .R.E vid .50 1. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estd u ringthe RelevantP eriod s d efined in paragraph15,supra.M s.M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su ch RelevantP eriod s. 10  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 12 of 18 Document Request No. 22:A lld ocu ments relatingto calend ars,sched u les orappointments for you from 1999 –present. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome,propou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well,and seeks d ocu ments ou tsid e of M s.M ax well’s possession,cu stod y orcontrol.M s. M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentitimplicates her rightto privacy.Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. Smay,30 2 P .3d 235 (C olo.20 13);Fed .R.E vid .50 1. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estd u ringthe RelevantP eriod s d efined in paragraph15,supra.M s.M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su ch RelevantP eriod s. Document Request No. 23:A lld ocu ments relatingto calend ars,sched u les orappointments for Jeffrey E pstein from 1999 –present. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome,propou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well,and seeks d ocu ments ou tsid e of M s.M ax well’s possession,cu stod y orcontrol.M s. M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentitimplicates herrightto privacy.Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. Smay,30 2 P .3d 235 (C olo.20 13);Fed .R.E vid .50 1. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estd u ringthe RelevantP eriod s d efined in paragraph15,supra.M s.M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su ch RelevantP eriod s. Document Request No. 24:A lld ocu ments relatingto contactlists,phone lists orad d ress books foryou orJ effrey E pstein from 1999 –present. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to 11  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 13 of 18 the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tent itimplicates herrightto privacy.Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. Smay,30 2 P .3d 235 (C olo.20 13); Fed .R.E vid .50 1. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estwithin the RelevantP eriod s d efined in paragraph15,supra.M s.M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su ch RelevantP eriod s. Document Request No. 25: A lld ocu ments relatingto any hospitalrecord s forV irginiaRoberts Giu ffre. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any su chd ocu ments. Document Request No. 26: A lld ocu ments relatingto any passportorlicense forV irginia Roberts Giu ffre. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any su chd ocu ments. Document Request No. 27:A lld ocu ments relatingto any gifts ormonetary payments provid ed to V irginiaRoberts Giu ffre by you ,J effrey E pstein orany related entity. RESPONSE:M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any su chd ocu ments. Document Request No. 28:A lld ocu ments relatingto V irginiaRobert’s employmentorwork as an ind epend entcontractorwithyou ,J effrey E pstein orany related entity. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any su chd ocu ments. Document Request No. 29:A lld ocu ments id entifyingind ivid u als to whom V irginiaRoberts provid ed amassage. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any su chd ocu ments. 12  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 14 of 18 Document Request No. 30:A lld ocu ments relatingto any employee lists orrecord s associated withyou ,J effrey E pstein orany related entity. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellhas been “associated with”any nu mberof entities overthe last17 years whichhave nothingto d o withthis civilcase,M s.Roberts orM r. E pstein. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estinsofaras itseeks employee lists forany entity related to M r.E pstein,M s.Roberts orany entity related to eitherone of them. Document Request No. 31:A lld ocu ments relatingto V ictoriaSecret,mod els oractresses,who were everin the presence of you orJ effrey E pstein orV irginiaRoberts between 1999 and 20 0 5. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ est. Document Request No. 32:A lld ocu ments related to commu nications withorinteraction with A lan D ershowitz from 1999 to present. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estas being interposed foran improperpu rpose,specifically P laintiff and hercou nsel’s civillitigation cu rrently pend ingin B roward C ou nty,Florid ain the matterof Cassells v. Dershowitz. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellwillprod u ce non- privileged d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estd u ringthe RelevantP eriod s d efined in paragraph15,supra.M s.M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su ch RelevantP eriod s. 13  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 15 of 18 Document Request No. 33:A lltravelrecord s between 1999 and the presentreflectingyou r presence in:(a)P alm B eachFlorid aorimmed iately su rrou nd ingareas;(b)9 E .7 1 stStreet,N ew Y ork,N Y 10 0 21;(c)N ew M ex ico;(d )U.S.V irgin Island s;(e)any jetoraircraftowned or controlled by Jeffrey E pstein. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.This requ estis also d u plicative and cu mu lative of Requ ests N os.8 and 14 above.M s. M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estforthe RelevantP eriod s as d efined in paragraph 15,supra.M s.M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su chRelevant P eriod . Document Request No. 34:A lld ocu ments reflectingyou rownershiporcontrolof property in L ond on between the years 1999 and 20 0 2. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitcalls ford ocu ments thatare amatterof the pu blic record and are thu s equ ally available to the P laintiff. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellis withhold ing d ocu ments Responsive to this Requ estthatare amatterof pu blic record . Document Request No. 35:A lld ocu ments reflectingyou rorJ effrey E pstein’s membershipor visits to the M ar-a-L ago C lu b in P alm B eachFlorid abetween the years 1999 and 20 0 2. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ est. Document Request No. 36:A lld ocu ments you rely u pon to establishthat(a)Giu ffre’s sworn allegations “againstGhislaine M ax wellare u ntru e.”(b)the allegations have been “shown to be u ntru e.” ;and (c)Giu ffre’s “claims are obviou s lies.” RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to the Requ estas argu mentative and misqu otes and misconstru es sentence fragments attribu ted to M s.M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this 14  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 16 of 18 Requ estto the ex tentitcalls forattorney-clientcommu nications,attorney workprod u ctand otherapplicable privileges.M s.M ax wellalso objects to this Requ estto the ex tentitcalls for d ocu ments relatingto V irginiaRoberts Giu ffre thatex istwithin the pu blic d omain,the internet orin pu blic cou rtrecord s and whichare equ ally available to bothparties and can be obtained from some othersou rces thatare more convenient,less bu rd ensome,and less ex pensive.Ind eed , many d ocu ments whichd emonstrate the falsity of M s.Giu ffre’s allegations concerningM s. M ax wellare within the possession and controlof P laintiff. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellis prod u cingnon- privileged d ocu ments responsive to this Requ est. Document Request No. 37: A lld ocu ments reflectingcommu nications you have had withB ill orH illary C linton (orpersons actingon theirbehalf),inclu d ingallcommu nications regard ing you rattend ance atC helseaC linton’s wed d ingceremony in 20 10 . RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ eston the grou nd s thatitis overly broad , u nd u ly bu rd ensome and /orpropou nd ed forthe improperpu rpose of annoyingorharassingM s. M ax well.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence. Su bjectto and withou twaivingthe above objections,M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ estforthe RelevantP eriod s as d efined in paragraph 15,supra.M s.M ax wellis withhold ingprod u ction of d ocu ments ou tsid e of su chRelevant P eriod s. Document Request No. 38:A lld ocu ments reflectingcontactwithyou by any law enforcement orpolice agency,inclu d ingany contactby the FB I,P alm B eachP olice D epartment,orW est P alm B eachP olice D epartment. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellhas been u nable to locate any d ocu ments responsive to this Requ est. Document Request No. 39:A lld ocu ments reflectingtrainingto fly ahelicopterorex perience flyingahelicopter,inclu d ingany record s concerningyou roperation of ahelicopterin the U.S. V irgin Island s. RESPONSE: M s.M ax wellobjects to this Requ estto the ex tentthatitcalls forthe prod u ction of d ocu ments thatare irrelevantto this action and notreasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence.M s.M ax wellfu rtherobjects to this Requ estto the ex tent 15  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 17 of 18 itimplicates herrightto privacy.Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. Smay,30 2 P .3d 235 (C olo.20 13); Fed .R.E vid .50 1. M s.M ax wellis withhold ingd ocu ments responsive to this Requ estas irrelevantand not reasonably calcu lated to lead to the d iscovery of ad missible evid ence and privacy. D ated :Febru ary 8 ,20 16 Respectfu lly su bmitted , s/ Laura A. Menninger L au raA .M enninger(L M -137 4) H A D D O N ,M O RGA N A N D FO RE M A N ,P .C . 150 E ast10 th A venu e D enver,C O 8 0 20 3 P hone: 30 3.831.7364 Fax : 30 3.832.2628 lmenninger@ hmflaw.com Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell 16  Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 79-2 Filed 04/04/16 Page 18 of 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Icertify thaton Febru ary 8 ,20 16,Iserved the attached d ocu mentD E FE N D A N T GH ISL A IN E M A X W E L L ’S RE SP O N SE S A N D O B J E C TIO N S TO P L A IN TIFF’S FIRST RE Q UE ST FO R P RO D UC TIO N O F D O C UM E N TS viaemailto the followingcou nselof record : Sigrid S.M cC awley B O IE S ,S C H IL L E R & FL E X N E R,L L P 40 1 E astL as O las B ou levard ,Ste.120 0 Ft.L au d erd ale,FL 3330 1 smccawley@ bsfllp.com s/Alan Schindler A lan Schind ler 17