podesta-emails

podesta_email_20709.txt

podesta-emails 2,228 words email
P17 P22 V11 D6 D2
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Dec. 23, 2007 Copyright (c) Las Vegas Review-Journal *PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS: Obama's gaming give, take* *Candidate accepts industry's money, still expresses concern* By MOLLY BALL REVIEW-JOURNAL Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama enjoys poker and blackjack, and admires the way the gaming industry powers Nevada's economy. But in his home state, it's a different story. As a matter of principle, he repeatedly opposed expanding gambling in Illinois, saying it was bad for communities and not a good way to fund government. As recently as 2003, Obama, then an Illinois state senator, said he believed the "moral and social cost of gambling" was potentially "devastating" and that using gaming as a source of revenue or for economic development was "irresponsible." He didn't think Illinois legislators should accept political contributions from the gaming industry, and in 2004 and 2006 refused federal contributions from gaming companies. Today, it's a different story: He's the U.S. Senate's No. 10 recipient of gaming donations, backed in Nevada by such industry insiders as Billy Vassiliadis and Elaine Wynn, and actively seeking the support of the gaming-dependent Culinary union. Obama's campaign says there is no inconsistency because he believes states should regulate gambling. As an Illinois state senator, he objected to the way the state regulated the industry. In Nevada, he believes regulation has been done right. And as a federal lawmaker, he doesn't have an oversight role. However, in simple terms, Obama was an antagonist of the gaming industry when he was an Illinois legislator. Now, as a federal lawmaker and presidential candidate, he is its friend, although it is a friendship on uneasy terms. He is not the only candidate with a mixed record on the industry that, while frowned upon in churches, is the sine qua non of Nevada's economy. Among his rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards was a co-sponsor of a federal bill to ban betting on college sports. Edwards now says that if elected he wouldn't press for a ban. For her part, New York Sen. Hillary Clinton hasn't taken a position on the current debate over whether Internet gambling should be legalized. To say Obama has become a proponent of gaming would be too strong. In fact, he has, when pressed, stood by his views that casinos aren't a good way for governments to generate revenue or for communities to improve economically. Asked about gaming by The Associated Press in March, he said it was "something I continue to be concerned about." Pressed on the issue on the Las Vegas television show "Face to Face with Jon Ralston" in June, he expressed his love for poker and blackjack, but said when it comes to state revenue, "I just believe in paying for government services the old-fashioned way." This goes against the gaming industry's view, and it's not something he mentions when he campaigns in Las Vegas. But it is perhaps in keeping with a candidate who prides himself on putting principle above politicking and who won't just do or say anything to get elected. However, when it comes to gambling's impact on communities, Obama has, if not reversed, clearly softened his position. He told the AP he believes there is "certainly a potentially moral and social cost to gambling, if it's not properly regulated, if children have access to it." Nevada, he said, could be proud of the way it used gaming as a "very successful economic model." That's a less severe stance than Obama expressed in a May 2003 article in the Chicago Defender newsletter. "I think that the moral and social cost of gambling, particularly in low-income communities, could be devastating," he was quoted as saying. Obama wasn't pushing for more regulation. Rather, he was arguing against more gambling in his state. In 2003, he voted in favor of a bill supported by the gaming industry that loosened some regulations on riverboats. His campaign says it wasn't a reversal because the bill didn't create any new casinos. In a 2002 candidate survey from the anti-gambling Illinois Churches in Action, Obama said he was opposed to increasing the amount of gaming in existing casinos, slot machines at racetracks, video gaming at drinking establishments and additional riverboat casinos. "I think it's a bad idea," he told the Defender in February 2001, talking about a bill to add slot machines. "I am generally skeptical about the steady expansion of gambling in Illinois and the use of gaming as an economic development tool." Illinois has for decades had betting at horse racetracks and a lottery. But the gaming industry, as in casino operators, entered the state in 1991, when riverboat gambling was legalized. The state said there would be just 10 gambling boats and they would go to communities that could prove they needed a boost. Gambling would be allowed only while the boats were cruising; Cook County, which contains Chicago, and Lake Michigan were ruled out as locales. "If you look at who invested in the boats, it's clear people expected it (gambling) would evolve into something much more," said Kent Redfield, a political scientist at the University of Illinois in Springfield who studies Illinois politics. Many of the investors were big, Las Vegas-based gaming companies such as Harrah's and Mirage Resorts. "It was pretty dormant until the 1999 session," Redfield said. That's when the industry mounted a massive lobbying effort and legislators from both political parties cobbled together a bill -- stuffed with pork projects to get lawmakers on board -- that eliminated the cruising requirement and the ban on Cook County casinos. The bill passed. Obama (to whom Redfield acknowledges he is "favorably disposed" because they worked together on campaign-finance legislation) voted against it, saying at the time that the loosening of restrictions was a "race to the bottom" and that campaign contributions from gaming interests played a role. There are no limits on contributions in Illinois. Gaming gave legislators more than $1 million and the governor more than $400,000 in the run-up to the 1999 legislative battle, Redfield's research found. Obama refused money from gaming, telling National Public Radio, "It is very hard to separate yourself from the interests of the gaming industry if you're receiving money." Redfield said Obama's stance was in line with the position of urban anti-poverty and other community groups. "Basically, the argument that it's disruptive to communities, it's regressive and that it's not good public policy, I think that was a sincere position for him," Redfield said. Some of those community groups might be a little disappointed to see their man now holding fundraisers in Las Vegas casinos and taking tens of thousands of dollars from people in the gaming industry, Redfield said. "This is a dilemma when you've got a political system where money is an important component. You can't make good public policy if you can't get elected. You make trade-offs. Insofar as he's come to terms with the industry, voters have to judge if somebody's making too much of an accommodation in order to get elected." Not making accommodations for moneyed interests is a major theme of Obama's campaign. For his presidential run, he ceased accepting contributions from federal lobbyists and political action committees, saying it's necessary to be free from their influence. An anti-gambling crusader who considered Obama a friend of his cause in Illinois is suspicious that's what's happening. "When he was a new state senator, he appeared on our local public affairs (television) show and said, 'I really don't think a lottery is a good idea. I'm troubled by it,'" said Tom Grey, founder of the National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling. Grey started his group in Illinois in reaction to the riverboats. It eventually became essentially the only national group dedicated to stopping what he calls "the tsunami" of gambling expansion. "I filed that away and said, 'That's interesting. He's an up-and-comer,'" Grey said. "Then, in 1999, that was the big vote and he voted against gambling expansion. He was on the high ground on that." Grey said most federal candidates dismiss gambling as a state's rights issue to avoid having to take a stand on it, but he said they should have to answer three questions: Should Internet gambling be legal? Should Indian tribes be allowed to build casinos outside their reservations? And should gaming be allowed to make political contributions? Grey believes the answer to all three should be no. Obama's campaign says he accepts gaming-connected contributions now because, with gaming largely regulated at the state level, it's no longer a conflict of interest. But the campaign didn't explain why those contributions weren't welcome at the federal level when he was collecting money in 2004 and 2006. And as Grey points out, there are still regulatory issues at the federal level. Obama's campaign said he believes tribal gaming should be decided on a case-by-case basis with consideration for the wishes of the states involved, and that the government should "bring (Internet gaming) under regulatory control to stop the worst abuses" -- that is, make it legal. Grey said he believes Obama is doing what he has to do to be a viable candidate, just like any other politician. Grey disagrees with the idea that expanding gaming is a good way for states to bring in tax dollars. He pointed to Nevada's current budget woes as an example of the danger of relying on taxes from gaming. "If he says it's economic development, it's harmless, it's entertainment like shopping or the movies -- then I'm going to be really upset," Grey said. "That would really be a gigantic flip-flop." That view is the gaming industry's position, but it is not Obama's. "Barack Obama knows that gaming has been a major engine of growth for Nevada," spokeswoman Gilson said. But, he also "believes gaming is an issue that impacts all communities differently. ... Nevada is unique. Las Vegas communities were built around tourism and gaming, and as a result, the state has mature regulatory structures. We can't ignore that putting gaming in low-income areas can have a negative effect on low-income families." The 60,000-member Nevada Culinary union, whose endorsement the Democratic candidates have ardently sought, doesn't have a position on gaming per se, but "we're generally supportive of the expansion of gaming when it provides jobs," the union's political director, Pilar Weiss, said. Culinary's sister union in Chicago, Local 1 of UNITE HERE, plans to endorse along with Culinary next month. The local's membership includes about 1,200 gaming workers, said its president, Henry Tamarin. The union supports expanding gaming because it would create jobs, he said. Another legislative battle over expanding gaming is currently under way in the Illinois legislature; Obama does not support it. Vassiliadis, the Nevada Democratic power broker and lobbyist for the Nevada Resort Association, the casinos' trade group, said he had no misgivings about Obama. "Gaming is a state issue. It has consistently been a state issue," he said. "I am aware that he had concerns about how gaming had been regulated, executed, controlled in the state of Illinois. I am also aware that he has said that Nevada is a regulatory model that he has a lot of regard for." The executive director of the Illinois Casino Gaming Association, Tom Swoik, said casinos in the state employ 10,000 people and pay the state $800 million per year in taxes. With a graduated gross tax rate that tops out at 50 percent, Illinois has by far the highest gaming tax in the nation. The state in 2003 raised the top rate to 70 percent, but workers were laid off and revenues began to decline, and the rate is being phased back down. "It's been such an unstable business environment in this state that a lot of companies don't want to deal with it," Swoik said. "If you're a casino operator in Illinois, you've got a 50 percent tax rate and you never know when it might change." American Gaming Association President Frank Fahrenkopf, a Nevadan and former Republican National Committee chairman, wasn't surprised or distressed by Obama's uncomfortable relationship with gaming, an industry that, he likes to point out, asks mostly just to be left alone. "Most of the candidates will say they're personally against gaming on moral grounds, but they believe in state's rights," he said. "Therefore, if a state has made the decision, it's fine with them. George Bush had the same view when he was running for president." Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@ reviewjournal.com or (702) 387-2919. Find this article at: http://www.lvrj.com/news/12785077.html [image: Click Here to Print] <javascript:void(printArticle());> SAVE THIS<javascript:void(open('http://www.savethis.clickability.com/st/saveThis?partnerID=192612&urlID=25543245&origin=11','click','height=450,width=510,title=no,location=no,scrollbars=yes,menubars=no,toolbars=no,resizable=yes'));>| EMAIL THIS<javascript:void(open('http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=createPT&partnerID=192612&urlID=25543245','click','height=450,width=510,title=no,location=no,scrollbars=yes,menubars=no,toolbars=no,resizable=yes'));>| Close <javascript:self.close();> Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article. Copyright (c) Las Vegas Review-Journal, 1997 - 2008 Go Green! Subscribe to the electronic Edition at www.reviewjournal.com/ee/
👁 1 💬 0
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
821e9083d11bebe82aed2badc101381a9852e8216ae2648d951237c103ca7493
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!