📄 Extracted Text (517 words)
HUBUS133 Alpha Group Capital
transactions are effected. Such discretionary authority is granted to Hudson Bay Capital
in the applicable limited partnership agreement or investment management agreement.
Item 17. Voting Client Securities
Hudson Bay Capital has voting authority and responsibility with respect to securities held
by the Funds and may in the future have voting authority with respect to securities held
by other clients. Hudson Bay Capital's proxy voting policy is overseen and implemented
by a Proxy Voting Committee, consisting of the Chief Compliance Officer and the Chief
Operating Officer and such other persons as may be appointed from time to time. In
voting proxies relating to securities held by its Clients (each, a "Client Proxy"), Hudson
Bay Capital is guided by general fiduciary principles and votes in the manner it believes
is consistent with efforts to achieve a Client's stated investment objectives. Hudson Bay
Capital has appointed an unaffiliated third party proxy voting service, Institutional
Shareholder Services ("ISS"), to assist with the management of proxy voting. Hudson
Bay Capital retains the discretion to take no action with respect to a proposed vote if it
determines that doing so is in the best interests of a Client (for example, where Hudson
Bay Capital determines that the cost of voting exceeds the expected benefit to the Client).
Hudson Bay Capital has determined that in a large majority of voting situations, given the
time and effort necessary in order to vote a Client Proxy, it is in its Clients' best interests
for Hudson Bay Capital to rely on the analyses and vote recommendations provided by
ISS (each, an "ISS Recommendation"). In those situations, Hudson Bay Capital need not
take any further action, and ISS will vote the Client Proxy on Hudson Bay Capital's
behalf in accordance with the ISS Recommendations.5
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Hudson Bay Capital always maintains ultimate voting
discretion and may disregard an ISS Recommendation at any time. In particular, in
situations where Hudson Bay Capital determines that it is in a Client's best interest to
vote a Client Proxy in a particular way (the "HBC Proxy Voting Decision"), Hudson Bay
Capital will review the ISS Recommendation relating to such Client Proxy, and where the
ISS Recommendation differs from the HBC Proxy Voting Decision (or where there is no
ISS Recommendation with respect to such Client Proxy), Hudson Bay Capital will
specifically instruct ISS to vote the Client Proxy in accordance with the HBC Proxy
Voting Decision, in accordance with certain internal procedures applicable to the Proxy
Voting Committee.
Included in these procedures are steps Hudson Bay Capital takes that are designed to
identify conflicts or potential conflicts that could arise between its own interests and
those of its Clients. If it is determined that any such conflict or potential conflict is not
material, Hudson Bay Capital may vote Client Proxies notwithstanding the existence of
the conflict. If it is determined, however, that a conflict of interest is material, Hudson
s The ISS Proxy Voting Summary Guidelines can be accessed at http://www.issgovemance.com/policv-
witewav/votina-policics.
91
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0084875
CONFIDENTIAL SONY GM_00231059
EFTA01384578
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
82712bd604674fe5c6c1ce03c171418e11399573f1ec58deef37889f8cc31545
Bates Number
EFTA01384578
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0