👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (675 words)
From: "Matthew I. Menchel" >
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re:
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:28:25 +0000
Jeffrey,
As always, I enjoyed our get together. It dawned on me, after you mentioned your meeting with Tim Zagat, that sending
you - a person who never goes out to eat - a Zagats is a totally useless gift. Kind of like bringing a nice bottle of wine to
dinner for a guy who never drinks. Oh wait, I did that too.
Thanks for the info on Trivers. I'll check it out. Not sure I agree about the parent/teacher distinction in terms of difference
between biological vs adopted child. I can't imagine feeling any different about my son just cause he came from my same
genetic pool and I doubt he feels any differently towards me. I guess time will tell. I will say, I wouldn't have it any other
way.
Keep in touch,
Matt
Matthew I. Menchel
KOBRE & KIM LLP
www.kobrekim.com
New York I London I Hong Kong I Washington, DC I Miami I Cayman Islands I BVI
From: Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 12:11 AM
To: Matthew I. Menchel
Subject:
robert trivers , genes in conflict . blog found today . I also entertain the possibly that Sandusky
is innocent. Why? Because I took the initiative to read the trial transcript and formed my own conclusions.
I found nothing in the transcript that proved that Sandusky was innocent. I found nothing in the transcript that
proved to me, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Sandusky is guilty either. The testimony of the victims is
absolutely very sad. It's also inconsistent, and involves allegations that were brought to light often under very
dubious circumstances (previously estranged family members hiring civil lawyers for them, psychologists
uncovering repressed memories, questionable investigative and interview techniques, etc).
I encourage you all to read the transcript yourselves, then compare it with the Grand Jury testimony. Is Sandusky
innocent? Not necessarily. But, it certainly raises questions of his guilt. To me, the most disturbing thing about
this situation is the speed and conviction at which Sandusky was tried and found guilty by the media and public -
long before the case went to trial. No physical evidence. Mainly testimony by a handful of people who are now
filing civil suits for millions, and a former football coach who has told numerous different versions of his story
(and is now filing a civil suit of his own). Kind of reminiscent of the community hysteria surrounding the Salem
EFTA00646467
witchcraft trials. Scary.
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
This e-mail message is from Kobre s Kim LLP, a law firm, and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail message and any attachments from your
computer without retaining a copy.
IRS Circular 230 disclosure: Any tax advice contained in this communication (including any
attachments or enclosures) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for
the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting,
marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this
communication. (The foregoing disclaimer has been affixed pursuant to U.S. Treasury
regulations governing tax practitioners.)
EFTA00646468
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
82ccd24df96e6d7e7d56400531b436787f5e558e376a42331594344804de4efa
Bates Number
EFTA00646467
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0