📄 Extracted Text (536 words)
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN
Plaintiff, AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA
VS.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS,
individually.
Defendants.
I
PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S
MOTION FOR AN ENLARGMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO MEDIATE
Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and
pursuant to Rule 1.090(b) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby requests this
Honorable Court for an enlargement of time of ninety (90) days within which to comply
with the Court's order or mediation. As grounds therefore, Epstein would state:
I. At Plaintiff's request, this Court entered an Order on April 19, 2012
directing the parties to participate in Mediation within sixty (60) days; to wit: on or
before June 19, 2012.
2. Undersigned counsel was not counsel for Plaintiff on the date upon which
this Order was entered.
3. Undersigned counsel has been reviewing the volumes of documents that
have been produced in this case to date to prepare for all upcoming scheduled matters,
including Mediation, and to comply with other deadlines imposed by both the Court and
the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
4. Undersigned counsel has also been diligently preparing for multiple
hearings on this case, including hearings scheduled for June II, 2012 (which was
cancelled on June 10, 2012) and June 12, 2012, and multiple hearings in the ancillary
cases that are prevalent to this case.
5. Due to the busy schedules of the parties involved, including co-counsels,
the Plaintiff, the co-defendant and opposing counsels, undersigned counsel has been
EFTA00594693
unable to coordinate the scheduling of the mediation within the time frame provided in
the Court Order.
6. Plaintiff is requesting an additional ninety (90) days within which to
comply with the Court Order.
7. This motion is being made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
8. Since Plaintiff was the party who requested the Mediation and is now
requesting an enlargement of time, there is no prejudice suffered by an enlargement of
the time frame within which to comply.
9. Undersigned counsel has made a good faith attempt to confer with
opposing counsel for Mr. Edwards regarding the enlargement of time.
Wherefore, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein requests this Honorable Court grant
Plaintiff's motion for enlargement of time.
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served,
via electronic and US Mail, to all parties on the attached service list, this June 12, 2012.
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.
Florida Bar No.: 176737
Tonja Haddad, PA
524 South Andrews Avenue
Suite 200N
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
954.467.1223
954.337.3716 (facsimile)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EFTA00594694
SERVICE LIST
CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Jack Scarola, Esq.
Searcy Denney Scarola et al.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Jack Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA
250 Australian Ave. South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Marc Nurik, Esq.
1 East Broward Blvd.
Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Bradley J. Edwards, Esq.
Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman
425 N Andrews Avenue
Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq.
LS Law Firm
Four Seasons Tower
15th Floor
1441 Brickell Avenue
Miami, Florida 33131
EFTA00594695
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
841b36f77c02d994b7cd929f7d1b6ac0d1960439f830277f42a73023396ddd40
Bates Number
EFTA00594693
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0