EFTA01130815.pdf

APR-15-2016 FR991:i2ktrIORR NRAtpocument FA10.0431MEI0113age 1 of 2 P. 02 ECEDWE Th Haddon, Morgan and foreman. r.0 _1\\ APR 152016 loofa A. MonnInaes so east 10th Avenue HADDON MORGAN JUDGE SWEET CHAMBERS Denver. Colorado 80203 1, O•IMAN wwwilmnow.con) imenningotertmltow.com April 15, 2016 Vla Facsimile (212) 805-7925 S; ".1.• Y Hon. Robert W. Sweet United States District Judge li in :P( •- Err liMulAl. noisa( United States District Court DOC tt: Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse DAlt pp D. Southern District ofNew York 500 Pearl Street, Room 1940 New York, New York 10007-1312 Re: Maxwell, 15-vv4/2433-RWS Dear Judge Sweet: Plaintiff's counsel contends that Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Responses to Defendant's First Set of Discovery Requests (Doc. #92) contains at page 9 information designated "Confidential" pursuant to this Court's Protective Order (Doc. #62). While we disagree, and contend that Plaintiff has waived any Confidentiality by making representations to the Court in her publicly filed Response regarding her medical records and the contents thereof, we nevertheless are requesting that the Reply be placed under seal and that we substitute for public tiling a Reply which omits words from page 9 about which Plaintiff complains. Thank you for your consideration and we apologize to the Court for the inconvenience this disagreement has caused. Sincerely, HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. S2).7 /s/ Laura A. Menninger Laura A. Menninger EFTA01130815 APR-15-201 PfeP119-14.3crgeetfYthelecument 100 Nei:Nei/Melse 2 of 2 P. 03 Hon. Robert W. Sweet April 15, 2016 Page 2 c/c: Sigrid S. McCawley Boles, Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale_ Flinn -2211 EFTA01130816