📄 Extracted Text (760 words)
From: J <[email protected]>
To:
Subject: Re: Re:
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 03:18:42 +0000
Perfect!
Thx for your quick response. Will revert tomorrow
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:07 AM wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Alexander Nazaryan
Date: Janus 27 at 7:00:54 PM PST
To:
Subject: Re:
The story is about Dr. Kim, of course, and his tenure at WBG. I've spoken to more than a dozen people who
worked closely with JYK. Your name has come up in many of those conversations.
Does it mean that you are a "major" part of the story? It does not, though I hesitate to offer that assurance for
the very simple reason that there is no settled definition of "major."
Is your name currently in the article? It is, but as I've said before, we think very deeply about journalistic
ethics. That is only to say that we don't print everything we hear, nor print things we judge to be rumor or
malicious innuendo.
I think the above makes our need to have a conversation more urgent. One suggestion is that, if we do delay
the call, we do it so that my editor Sharon Weinberger is present. I trust her completely and believe that she
can help us approach this in the most responsible and productive way possible.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 9:36 PM > wrote:
Alexander thank you for your email.
I assume that I am not a major part of your story and that my name or any specifics about me will not be
used in this story — you may be aware I mentor young women.
If my assumption is incorrect then we will need to delay our call tonight.
On Jan 27, 2019, at 5:23 PM, Alexander Nazaryan < > wrote:
Thank you for getting back to me.
In short, the answer is yes, we can absolutely speak off the record.
EFTA01028108
But that requires some elaboration. For one, I have not met two people who agree
exactly on what off the record is. My definition is as follows: that nothing from the
conversation can be quotes or otherwise referenced in print unless it has been
independently confirmed elsewhere (i.e., if you tell me that Lee Harvey Oswald shot
JFK, I can print it because other sources say the same thing).
My one request is that, if, in the course of the conversation, something is said that I
believe is critical to the article, I can broach the possibility of a segment of our
conversation moving to either background or deep background. You would still have
total and unambiguous right to refuse.
The above is how I've worked in the past, and it has allowed me, in the course of
Leporting my book, to speak with people who have/have had extremely sensitive
West Wing positions. I've been able to win their trust and I hope that I can win yours.
Please let me know your thoughts on the above.
Don't worry about recording. I can run a recorder on my end. But if you want to
record for your own use, then by all means.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 7:36 PM > wrote:
Hi there - I'm grateful for your professionalism and high ethical standards.
Apologies for the delay in responding, I am
If you can confirm an off the record conversation, I will call you this evening at 7:30pm PST at
My call will come fronl and if you would like me to set up
a recorded line send word and I can arrange that as well.
On Jan 27, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Alexander Nazaryan < wrote:
Dear thank you for your call today. I very much look forward to speaking and want also to
assure you that the team at Yahoo News is rigorously professional. If possible, I would love to talk at
7:30 PST tonight. Please let me know.
Thank you.
Alexander
Alexander Nazaryan
National Correspondent
Yahoo News
EFTA01028109
@alexnazaryan
https://www.yahoo.com/authorialexander-nazaryan
Alexander Nazaryan
National Correspondent
Yahoo News
(ajatexnazaryan
https://www.yahoo.com/authodalexander-nazaryan
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01028110
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
869b5615e3e5d61b0a39ec82b56a8802a104a05daf2a109d9084f1a388f88523
Bates Number
EFTA01028108
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0