📄 Extracted Text (200 words)
Dear Mr. Berger:
I have received your letter and reject your analysis entirely.
As you concede in your letter, Mr. Epstein advanced $50,000 to Mr.
Couturier's firm of which $25,000 was to be credited against future fees, and, as Ms.
Calabrese acknowledged in her email, that $25,000 has been deemed by Mr.
Couturier to have been "credited back" to Mr. Epstein, as no future fees have been
earned. As you acknowledge, the remaining $25,000 (and not a penny more) was to
pay for an interior package that, notwithstanding your claim to the contrary, has not
been delivered to Mr. Epstein. In fact, Mr. Couturier unilaterally withdrew from the
project at its infancy without providing the interior package to Mr. Epstein. There
has been no furniture and custom furniture selection, and no selection of antiques,
fabrics, carpeting, window treatments and the like; nor have any furniture plans or
plans for custom built-ins been provided. The scant few drawings that Mr.
Couturier did provide can not under any reasonable analysis constitute the interior
package and, more importantly, have no useful value to Mr. Epstein. Moreover,
even if and cannot under any circumstances justify total charges to Mr. Epstein of
over $91,000.
EFTA00731370
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
88cb7a3a4fcb348f8382f709f888e8863b0afacb537ee42bda54d668df6b3245
Bates Number
EFTA00731370
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0