📄 Extracted Text (167 words)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE I and JANE DOE 2,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
/
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO INTERVENE OF ROY BLACK,
MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ
During the hearing on August 12, 2011, the Court directed the proposed intervenors to file additional
briefing on their argument that plea negotiations are privileged and not subject to discovery or use as evidence in
these proceedings. Proposed intervenors submit the following memorandum of law, which is identical to Part II
of the memorandum of law submitted by proposed intervenor Jeffrey Epstein in support of his motion for a
protective order and his opposition to the motions of the plaintiffs for production, use, and disclosure of his plea
negotiations. If allowed to intervene, the lawyers would then incorporate this argument into their motion for a
protective order, which was attached to their motion to intervene.
CUT AND PASTE HERE PART II OF JEFFREY'S MEMO
EFTA01168511
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
8966b53c8a3f4d2b1090bed25c4641b783ac4c32c236597dfc37d34edeb700d6
Bates Number
EFTA01168511
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0