podesta-emails

podesta_email_01635.txt

podesta-emails 6,978 words email
P17 V11 V9 P19 P22
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *Main Topics: *Nuclear Power Plants, Energy Attacks, Romney Interviews, New Ads, Tire Gauges * Summary:* Major presidential campaign coverage revolved around the candidates energy plans as both sides continue to wage attacks on their counter's positions. McCain spoke at nuclear power plants at Sturgis, SD last night and in Michigan today where he hit Obama on his lack of support for nuclear power and offshore drilling. McCain is now proposing building 45 new plants by 2030. In a testament to the McCain campaign's research department and advance team, the Senator spoke about the importance of nuclear energy at a plant famed for its near meltdown in the 60s. Tire gauge controversy also dominated discussion as well as new ads by McCain claiming to be "the original Maverick" and from Paris Hilton, who comically responded to McCain's use of her image in a previous ad. Non-campaign headlines included tornado's ravaging Chicago, Hurricane Edouard ended up being weaker than expected, the price of oil drops $2.24, stocks went up, aftershocks in China, the Feds caught computer identity thieves accused of stealing 40 million American internet users identities, and hundreds of undiscovered gorillas were found in the Congo. *Highlights: * 1. CNN: McCain Pushes Nuclear Power, Offshore Drilling, and Calls For Congress To Return to Session 2. McCain's Poor Choice Today a. MSNBC: McCain's Made a Poor Choice With "China Syndrome" Plant b. MSNBC: McCain Jumps From Figurative to Literal Meltdown 3. ABC: McCain's Nuclear Power Ambitions and His Attacks on Obama on ABC Nightly News 4. Romney Interviews a. CNN: Romney Discusses Energy and Nuclear Power Solutions, Name Calling, and Dick Cheney b. MSNBC: Romney Wrong on McCain's CAFE Standards Record 5. MSNBC: Donatelli Outlines McCain's Energy Plan, Attacks Obama's 6. FNC: The Original Maverick? New McCain Ad Tries to Distance Himself From President Bush 7. MSNBC: Carney: "'Broken' Recalls McCain's Record As a So-Called Maverick in Washington 8. Tire Gauge Controversy a. CNN: The Tire Gauge The Political Prop of the Week b. MSNBC: Holtz-Eakin Defends Tire Gauges and McCain's Energy Policy *No YouTube:* 1) MSNBC - MIKE BARNICLE: Naked wife jokes may work in Sturgis but probably won't help him win over these evangelicals. 2) MSNBC - RACHAEL MADDOW: Barack Obama creates large crowds when he gives speeches, John McCain's campaign has just figured out where there's going to be a large crowd for another reason and hope to slip their candidate in between other acts. 3) MSNBC: Olbermann plays Paris Hilton response ad 4) MSNBC: Pat Buchanan and Eugene Robinson debate who played the race card first *Clips:* *Highlight #1* *McCain Pushes Nuclear Power, Offshore Drilling, and Calls For Congress To Return to Session* (CNN 08/05/08 5:05pm) WOLF BLITZER: Raw and unfiltered, John McCain speaking in Michigan today after touring a nuclear plant in Newport. He talked about why nuclear power should play a big part in the solution to America's energy problems. JOHN MCCAIN: Solving our national energy crisis requires, as I mentioned in all of the above approach, and that will require aggressive development of alternative energies like wind, solar, tide, and bio-fuels. It also requires expanding additional sources of energy such as offshore drilling. And I notice that, it's confusing now information from Senator Obama as to whether he actually supports offshore drilling or not. The fact is, we have to drill here and we have to drill now and we have to drill immediately. And it has to be done as quickly as possible and I believe that it's vital that we move forward with that regardless of what we do on other energy issues. Senator Obama has said that expanding our nuclear power plants quote, "doesn't make sense for America." He also says no to nuclear storage and no to reprocessing. I could not disagree more. My experience with nuclear power goes back many years to being stationed on board the USS Enterprise, the first nuclear powered aircraft. Aircraft carrier. I knew it was safe then, and I know it's safe now. And I propose a plan to build 45 new nuclear plants before the year 2030 and that would provide 700,000 jobs for American workers. And that means new jobs, and if we really want to enable technologies of tomorrow like plug-in electric cars, we need electricity to plug into. Now, we all know that nuclear power isn't enough and drilling isn't enough. And we need to do all this and more. And it's time that the Congress came back to Washington and went about the people's business. They just went on a five-week vacation without even in the slightest way, addressing this nation's energy needs. People are paying $4.00/gallon for gas are sick and tired of a Congress that won't act in their behalf. So I'm urging Senator Obama to urge the democratic leaders of Congress to call Congress back into session. Come back from their vacation and act on our energy challenges. When I'm President of the United States I'll call them back into session and I'll keep calling them back until they act on behalf of the interests of the American people and this compelling national security issue. And it's time we got serious about energy independence. Our nation is sending 700 billion dollars a year to countries that don't like us very much and some of that money ends up in the hands of terrorist organizations. We're going to achieve energy independence and we're going to get it done, and we're going to use every available resource at our disposal. That means the Lexington Project, which I have been talking about now for a long, long period of time. I hope that the Congress of the United States will come back into session address offshore drilling, which is absolutely vital, address nuclear power, and all of the other approaches that are very necessary to achieve energy independence. * Highlight #2* *McCain's Made a Poor Choice With "China Syndrome" Plant* (MSNBC 08/05/08 6:06pm) RACHAEL MADDOW: My headline tonight is Nuclear Misfire in Michigan . . . the McCain campaign's patented message scrambling technique is unfortunately back at work in this nuclear reactor photo op today. Remember that movie China Syndrome, about a catastrophic nuclear reactor meltdown? The phrase "China syndrome" was coined when the Enrico Fermi nuclear site that John McCain went to for his photo op today partially melted down in 1966. That nuclear accident also inspired a non-fiction thriller called "We Almost Lost Detroit." Not exactly what you want to make Americans think of when they think of your energy plan. It wasn't too long ago that McCain was planning on running as the eco-Republican green candidate who was explicitly not a proponent of nukes. Now he's running as the drill everywhere, build nuclear reactors everywhere candidate and the whole "We Almost Lost Detroit" reminder too was probably a bad political move for McCain. DAVID GREGORY: But you've got a situation, Rachael, where both candidates now want to be on the record with almost everything. They want to be as comprehensive as possible when it comes to an energy plan because they're looking at the polls like everybody else. MADDOW: Sure, and they now that every single time any American goes to the gas station, they're thinking about what can be done at a federal level to bring gas prices down. McCain . . . has come a long way in terms of the things that he's for and against on energy policy. I just think that his stagecraft needs a little work before he tours the China syndrome plant. *McCain Jumps From Figurative to Literal Meltdown* (MSNBC 08/05/08 8:40pm) KEITH OLBERMANN: Nothing like having one word sum up an entire day on the campaign trail. For John McCain the word was meltdown. Yes, the vernacular kind but the literal kind too . . . John McCain goes nuclear. At the famed biker festival in Sturgis, South Dakota, Sen. McCain launched an attack about energy independence, at least originally and then kind of got lost in some of the more complicated sentences. JOHN MCCAIN: Is there anybody is that's tired of paying four dollars a du—a bu—bucks, four dollars a gallon for gasoline? Is there anybody that's sick and tired of it? Is there anybody that wants to become energy independent? Well I'm telling you right now, we're sending $700 billion over year and your congress just went on vacation for five weeks. Tell 'em to come back and get to work. Tell 'em to get to work! [cheering] When I'm President of the United States, I'm not going to let them go on vacation. They're going to become energy independent and we're not going to pay $4 a gallon for gas because we're going to drill offshore and we're going to drill now. And we're going to drill here and we're going to drill now. [bikes revving] My opponent doesn't want to drill, he doesn't want nuclear power. He wants you to inflate your tires. [booing] My friends, we need a commander in chief, we need a commander in chief who'll end the war in Iraq but will win it the right way and that's by winning it. OLBERMANN: You let me know when you come up with that wrong way of winning a war by winning it. And while we explained to the senator last night how the Bush administration and NASCAR both insist that tire inflation really does save huge quantities of gas, Sen. Obama responded to McCain on his own today. BARACK OBAMA: It's like these guys take pride in being ignorant. [laughter] You know? I mean, they think it's funny that they're making fun of something that's actually true. They need to do their homework . . . OLBERMANN: McCain meanwhile highlighted part of his energy plan, subsidies for more nuclear plants, touring a nuclear plant today, the first presidential candidate in recent memory to do so. Most apparently considering them politically radioactive. McCain's showpiece for safe nuclear energy? The Enrico Fermi 2 plant, half an hour from Detroit, half an hour from Ann Arbor, half an hour from Toledo, where a nuclear regulatory commission alert occurred after a leak forced a plant shutdown and cancellation of nearby afterschool activities. This following 2001's quote, "catastrophic bearing failure" of the emergency diesel generator there and the 1999 security violation at Fermi where someone got a loaded handgun inside. So why not tour Enrico Fermi Plant 1? Well, they shut that down in 1972 and enough liquid sodium still remains that just this May, it started a fire there which the NRC had to check for radioactivity. That and of course, Enrico Fermi 1 is best known for its actual, partial meltdown from 1966, chronicled in a best-seller called, "We Almost Lost Detroit." . . . *Highlight #3* *McCain's Nuclear Power Ambitions and His Attacks on Obama on ABC Nightly News* (ABC 08/05/08 6:10pm) CHARLES GIBSON: For the second day in a row the presidential candidates were talking about energy while campaigning in battleground states. […] Meanwhile, John McCain was in Michigan calling for construction of 45 new nuclear power plants by the year 2030. […] RON CLAIBORNE: John McCain toured the 20 year old Fermi Nuclear facility near Detroit today, a campaign swing meant to highlight his call to building dozens of new atomic power plants in the U.S. […] McCain believes nuclear power is a viable way to produce electricity and decrease America's reliance on foreign oil. Some energy experts agree. CHRIS LARSEN: The 40 or so power plants is consistent with some of our analysis in what would be required in the next 20 to 30 years in order to provide electricity at a reasonable cost. CLAIBORNE: McCain also attacked Barack Obama today for, as McCain said, opposing expanding the use of nuclear power. […] Actually, Obama does not oppose more nuclear power plants, he favors going forward only if it can be done safely. McCain says it is safe now. […] The McCain campaign believes it is scoring points by hitting Obama hard on the energy issue, trying to brand him as opposed to nuclear power and offshore oil drilling, and ridiculing Obama for saying that inflating your tires will improve gas mileage. […] McCain and Obama believe energy has become a cutting issue. And both sides will continue pounding away at each other. * Highlight #4* *Romney Discusses Energy and Nuclear Power Solutions, Name Calling, and Dick Cheney* (CNN 08/05/08 5:34pm) WOLF BLITZER: […] In the past couple of days Senator Obama has been making this very serious charge against Senator McCain. […] Can you site one legislative accomplishment that Senator McCain produced during those 26 years in Washington in order to achieve energy independence? MITT ROMNEY: Well I'm not a historian that goes through all of the pieces of legislation John McCain has worked on, but lets talk about one piece of legislation that's pretty relevant and that's the Bush energy plan which Barack Obama voted in favor of and John McCain looked at it and said it's so larded up with tax breaks and special incentives to oil companies and gas companies. John McCain voted no on that piece of legislation. They have very different perspectives. John McCain has laid out his plan to get energy independence and it includes nuclear power and it includes drilling offshore. Both of those things are opposed by Barack Obama and there's no way America can become energy independent and energy prices can come down without nuclear power and more drilling as well as all the alternative sources that both men agree on. BLITZER: He also proposes, Senator McCain, a cut in the overall corporate tax structure in the United States and that would, in effect, represent a billion dollar a year bonanza, if not more, for EXXON Mobil and some of the other big oil companies. Should there be an exemption for the big oil companies who are producing record profits every quarter so they don't benefit from yet more tax breaks? ROMNEY: You know, um, there's a real question that we have in this country as to whether we're going to believe in free market systems, and the way the markets work, free enterprise. Or whether, instead, we want to have government run economies and we can pick winners and losers and say that certain companies are making too much money. And then by the way, if companies don't do well, should government pay them money so they do better? This is where it all leads. You know, I don't like the fact that big oil is making the kind of money they're making, I don't think a lot of people are excited about it. At the same time, I'm not sure you want to jump in there and change the rules after many many investors, retirees, pension funds, and so forth have invested in companies like EXXON Mobil. Do you say, hey guess what guys, we're taking away those dividends that you invested for? So, in my view, you put down the law, you follow the rule of law, and you also lower the tax rates on small corporations, on all corporations to make America more competitive. We have tax rates, corporate tax rates, well higher than Europe, almost as high as Japan's which is the highest in the world. It's killing jobs here, John McCain's right. BLITZER: Senator McCain in that ad that caused a lot of controversy the other day, he compared Senator Obama to Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. Just yesterday, you said Senator Obama was like quote " an internet date". Here's the question, is it appropriate to use these kind of comparisons against the democratic presidential nominee, in effect, is it appropriate to be name calling the democratic presidential candidate? ROMNEY: Well, the name calling is on both sides of course, politics is a, well let's say it's not tiddlewinks by any means. And in many cases, you want to describe something in a way people remember. I thought that John McCain's ad was humorous and right on target. And in fact, we've watched Barack Obama give some wonderful speeches talking about hope and audacity, but what he hasn't done is talk about what he would do to solve the problems of America and now that Americans are actually listening to him talk about energy and finding that he opposes offshore drilling, and he opposes nuclear power, and he says that we can end our problems with energy with inflating our tires, more appropriately, and tuning up our engines, people say wow, this guy's not ready for primetime. BLITZER: Do you regret calling him, saying he's like an internet date? ROMNEY: No, it's like an internet date in that it sounded very good initially, when people look at him and hear him speak they say, wow this guy's great. But then you get to know him a little better and you say you know, what you really see behind the surface is not exactly what people had hoped for. BLITZER: The Democratic National Committee, they've got a website basically saying that all of the Republican vice-presidential potential candidates out there represent the next Dick Cheney. […] You're on that short list, by all accounts, to be the vice-presidential running mate for Senator McCain. What do you think about Dick Cheney? ROMNEY: You know, Dick Cheney is a fine person who has served this country with distinction. I don't agree with him on every issue, I don't agree with most republicans on every single issue. My guess is a lot of people who are being considered by John McCain as V.P. material are people who are very independent. Probably of John McCain, but also of Dick Cheney or George Bush. Just because we're republican doesn't mean we see all issues the same way and suggesting that we're all like Dick Cheney or we're all like George Bush is a nice effort on their part, but I frankly don't think it'll fly. BLITZER: He's been Vice-President now for almost 8 years, earlier he was the Defense Secretary, he served in Congress, served as a White House Chief of Staff under then President Gerald Ford. Should he be invited to speak at this Republican Convention in St. Paul, because we're getting word he's not going to be there. ROMNEY: Yeah, I have no idea who's going to be speaking at the convention. BLITZER: But should he be? Should he speaking, should he be invited, given his public service over the years? ROMNEY: I don't know, I don't know if he particularly cares, and I don't know if it makes a big difference. Frankly, what really makes a difference in a presidential election is who the presidential nominee is not who the vice president or who the vice presidential nominee is. A lot of folks are putting a lot of attention on these short lists, and who's on it and who's not, but you know what? It's going to come down to John McCain and Barack Obama. We're going to listen to their positions on issues, we're going to see them in debates, and on the basis of those two men, head to head, America's going to choose the next president, and they're going to want someone who can lead and has the experience of leading in difficult times. John McCain has been a leader all his life, Barack Obama hasn't had that experience yet. I'd like him to get it before we consider him for higher office. BLITZER: Wouldn't it be insulting? Wouldn't it be a slap in the face of Dick Cheney if he weren't allowed to speak at the convention? ROMNEY: Well, if Dick Cheney didn't want to speak at the convention it certainly wouldn't be a slap, and I don't know that anyone is suggesting that he will or won't speak. I just don't think it makes a big difference one way or another. *Romney Wrong on McCain's CAFE Standards Record* (MSNBC 08/05/08 BARNICLE: . . . one of the great discussions in this country . . . has to do with energy . . . yesterday . . . Barack Obama gave a speech on . . . his energy proposals. What are yours? Not as a candidate . . . as a guy who knows a lot about energy . . . about putting together business plans. . . ROMNEY: . . . you're going to have to pursue every possible source of new energy that America can find and at the same time . . . of energy efficiency we can achieve . . . more nuclear power. . . more drilling . . . more natural gas . . .liquefied coal . . . And . . . wind power, solar power. . . pursue them to the max and invest in new technologies, create incentives for enterprises to develop these new technologies. . . that happens to be John McCain's proposal, he wants to become energy independent . . . to pursue all of those avenues. Barack Obama says, no to nuclear power . . . offshore drilling and those two are essential if we're going to become seriously independent of our dependence on foreign oil. BARNICLE: . . . in some . . . Americans' minds that if we engage in offshore oil drilling that the price of gas will come down within 2 or 3 weeks . . .So what'd you do about getting the price of gas in a manageable range in a relatively short period of time? ROMNEY: . . . announcing . . . offshore drilling and going after some of the reserves that are available would have an immediate effect on price because the expectations of those that trade in oil futures would be that more supply is going to come on the market down the road . . . most of the impact is going to be longer term . . . and substantial. And what you have to do to affect global and US oil prices substantially is to have the largest consuming nation, that's us, lay out a course that says we're going to do what's necessary to get off of foreign oil. Just doing that . . . would have the effect of lowering gasoline prices almost immediately. BARNICLE: . . . it's rare to see the word conservation right up top in John McCain's plan . . . yet . . . you're about to go off to China for the Olympics . . . a nation that's becoming increasingly greedy for energy sources along with nations like India. What can we do as Americans to conserve energy without risking our lifestyle? Or are we just too spoiled to conserve? ROMNEY: Now actually, I think that you're going to see in this country . . . a far greater effort to become energy efficient than we've ever seen before and that's going to be in our automobiles. . . . John McCain has in fact been a supporter of the CAFE fuel standard tightening and that has had . . . or can have a major impact on our use of gasoline and oil products. . . it's going to have to be in our homes and energy usage in our homes. From the type of furnaces we use to heat our homes . . . air conditioning and our insulation systems. Probably the least expensive and most immediate impact we can have on energy prices . . . is by taking advantage of new energy efficiencies. That's something that I think John McCain will pursue with the same kind of aggressiveness he will pursue every source of additional energy. And that combination is what gets us to a point where we can say, "Thanks very much but we don't need your oil" to the Middle East. BARNICLE: . . . a lot of Americans are fearful for the future and . . . are hurting economically, gas prices in particular . . . in 1980 Ronald Reagan ran against Jimmy Carter and phrased the question that Americans responded to . . . "Are you better off today than you were four years ago?". . . Do you think we're worse off today than we were four years ago? ROMNEY: … with regards to the threat of . . . jihad I think we're in a better position in Iraq thanks to the virtue of the surge which John McCain pushed for a long time . . . with regards to the economy, the credit crisis, the mortgage crisis . . . the higher prices of gasoline have made the American family less well off . . . that's why you have John McCain standing up and saying, look, I'm an independent minded guy, I'm a maverick, I've fought for what I believe in from the very beginning . . . job number one in that regard is to get us off our dependence on foreign oil . . . he's not taking anything off the table . . . it's a very stark contrast with Barack Obama . . . BARNICLE: Nothing off the table including raising taxes? ROMNEY: Well, raising taxes doesn't … provide more sources of energy . . . that's one place where John McCain is saying no, I'm not going to raise taxes . . . he's also, look, to try and help families during the summer time saying we should have taken off the federal gas tax during the summer . . . *Highlight #5* *Donatelli Outlines McCain's Energy Plan, Attacks Obama's *(MSNBC 08/05/08 4:30pm) DAVID SHUSTER: The McCain campaign has repeatedly ridiculed Barack Obama's calls for conservation going so far as to hand out tire gauges to mock Obama. It was noted that Americans can save gas by keeping their tires properly inflated. Frank Donatelli's chairman of the RNC and spokesman for the McCain campaign. Frank, the Bush Administration's own highway department said that if more American's would properly inflate our tires and tune our engines we'd save about 800,000 barrels a day. Isn't that more than we'd get from John McCain's new offshore drilling plan? FRANK DONATELLI: Absolutely not. Look, no one is saying, David, that conservation isn't a good idea. But we need a plan that's balanced; we need a plan that addresses the long term and the short term solutions. Senator Obama's plan does not give us an additional drop of domestic oil, coal or nuclear, period. SHUSTER: But you would acknowledge that John McCain's plan doesn't produce any new oil for at least seven years. DONATELLI: I would not acknowledge that at all. Uh, experts tell us that in the Gulf of Mexico, for example, where there's already infrastructure you could additional oil online pretty quickly. In addition to that SHUSTER: Right, you can get it online but the refining capacity isn't there, right? DONATELLI: Well, I mean you solve one problem at a time. We're also in favor of additional, well you have to do more in terms of our refining capacity also, but look, in the long term we have to make a commitment to do something about domestic energy supplies. Once we do that, the psychology of the markets will change. Even if it takes several years as far as drilling off the east and west coast, we have to begin now if we're going to fill the middle before we get into the long-term, where maybe alternative energy fuels might make a difference. But McCain has a plan. SHUSTER: I want to get into the new ad that the McCain campaign is running. Here's part of it. ["Broken" plays] SHUSTER: Hey Frank, how's John McCain going to battle big oil? DONATELLI: He will vote in the best interests to the United States on every piece of legislation. David, he has always done that. SHUSTER: How's he going to battle big oil specifically? DONATELLI: He will not give them specific subsidies like Senator Obama voted for in the 2005 bill. All he's going to do is he's going to strike SHUSTER: I mean, he's giving them corporate tax breaks. Corporate tax breaks worth 3.8 billion dollars. Now granted, John McCain believes we should give every corporation tax breaks, so it is misleading to suggest, as Obama does, that somehow John McCain is singling out Exxon Mobile for tax breaks, but the fact of the matter is, don't you agree, that his corporate tax plan would lower the tax rate that a company like Exxon mobile's going to pay by nearly 3.8 billion dollars for big oil. DONATELLI: David, as you pointed out, lower taxes for corporations are lower taxes for all corporations, not just oil, and we do that because at some point taxes are too high, it discourages work and incentive and it lowers our economic growth. We have the highest corporate tax rate in the world. If Senator McCain advocates lowering the corporate tax rate, it's because he believes that our economy needs to be kicked in gear. We need to create jobs and the private sector does that, the government does not do that. SHUSTER: Frank, one more quick question. At the start of the ad, we heard the ad say that we are worse off than we were four years ago. But during this campaign, John McCain said that we've made great progress economically. So what is it, great progress, or worse off? DONATELLI: Like most economic statistics, it's a mixed bag. Clearly in terms of the short term, in terms of inflation and in terms of unemployment, we are not in a good situation. On the other hand, there are statistics showing that we have made progress in certain areas. So it's a mixed bag. But f or right now, the economy is soft, we're teetering on the brink of a potential downturn. The last thing, David, that we need to do now is do what Senator Obama says, and raise virtually every tax known to man. What we need to do is keep taxes low, and that will eventually strengthen our economy. SHUSTER: Frank Donatelli's the spokesman for the McCain campaign, one of the pros who can hit 'em back just as hard as we throw them at him. *Highlight #6* *The Original Maverick? New McCain Ad Tries to Distance Himself From President Bush* (FNC 08/05/08 7:34pm) SHEPARD SMITH: McCain's out with a brand new ad today calling himself the original Maverick. […] Is that a response to Obama's claim that McCain's running for president for Bush's third term. CARL CAMERON: Yes and no. McCain's boasted about his independence for years. But buying airtime is a very big step. And it's true that Obama's scuffed up McCain's image. So, McCain's sort of trying to set the record straight. His argument is that Obama promises change but has little record or history of it because he's fairly new to politics. Where as McCain's managed for years to be pushing reforms through Congress that an awful lot of people never thought would ever get through. SMITH: McCain's ad also says we're worse off than we were four years ago, which economically speaking is hard to argue with, but a serious shot at President Bush. CAMERON: It is, McCain makes no bones about differing with the President but aides say that when the campaigns over it'll be hard to recognize that McCain and Bush were ever in the same party. They also say that what McCain really thinks is that we are better off than we were 8 years ago when Bush took over for President Clinton, but in the last four years or so, the House Republicans and the President sort of lost control of spending. And he's never been afraid of dissing republicans when it serves his political lens. […] It is true that McCain has cast an awful lot of votes in Congress in line with his party and his President, but it's also true that McCain has stuck his finger in the eye of the G.O.P. far more than anybody. And certainly far more than Obama has with democrats. McCain's known for aggravating his party and Obama's known for a fairly reliable, albeit newcomer democrat. *Highlight #7* *Carney: "'Broken' Recalls McCain's Record As a So-Called Maverick in Washington* (MSNBC 08/05/08 6:03pm) JAY CARNEY: . . . McCain remembers who he was, his new ad is called "Broken," and what it breaks is a streak of non-stop attacks from the McCain campaign . . . the new ad instead recalls McCain's record as a so-called maverick in Washington . . . ["Broken" plays] CARNEY: . . .the attacks will not stop on Obama. They succeeded, I think, in reinvigorating the McCain campaign and exciting Republicans and making them believe perhaps they won't lose this race after all but the McCain campaign will spend . . . a great deal of money reminding voters of what they thought they liked about McCain before this campaign. DAVID GREGORY: It is striking though, it says that you are worse off than four years ago, not eight years ago, when he did campaign for Bush's reelection. CARNEY: Well, it is interesting and it's a hard situation because, as we know, President Bush will speak at the Republican Convention. President Bush's legacy hangs over the party and this Republican nominee and is a distraction and a problem for John McCain in his race for the White House. *Highlight #8* *The Tire Gauge The Political Prop of the Week* (CNN 08/05/08 6:57pm) JEANE MOOS: Could this be the hiss of the air going out of a political stunt? The tire pressure gauge has become the political prop of the week, as the McCain campaign uses it to try to deflate Senator Obama. […] This is what Senator Obama did say as he kicked off things individuals could do save energy. BARACK OBAMA: Making sure your tires are properly inflated. MOSE: Those seven words became what the McCain campaign dubbed "Obama's energy plan". Emblazoned on tire pressure gauges they handed out on the press plane. McCain folks even handed out tire gauges to people lining up for an Obama rally. They're being sold on Ebay for 10 bucks. And over and over Senator McCain used tire inflation to tred on Obama. […] Tire pressure, tire pressure, all this talk about tire pressure is raising my blood pressure. […] Boo, hiss is what columnist Joe Klein is saying. JOE KLEIN: I think the McCain campaign has this weird idea that you can win a presidential election through mockery. MOOS: But the Automobile Association of America isn't mocking tire inflation. On a vehicle like this, just one tire, […] could result in this. [Losing about 8 percent of your fuel economy] After several days of republican spin on the tire issue Obama got tired of it. […] His actual energy plan fills page after page on his website. […] But watch your back, tire pressure gauges can be hazardous. This guy used one to create a pipe to smoke ganga and our AAA expert found out it's not just the gauge that's feeling the pressure. *Holtz-Eakin Defends Tire Gauges and McCain's Energy Policy* (MSNBC 08/05/08 2:06pm) TAMRON HALL: . . . the offshore oil drilling, there's of course been a compromise according to Sen. Obama, as he has described it, we saw John McCain do the same thing but much earlier . . . did Sen. Obama . . . . wait too long to come up with the idea on offshore oil drilling? AUSTAN GOLDBEE: There's a political distinction there on how to make a compromise to get a real energy bill and then there's a what will put money in people's pockets right now and Obama's been way ahead of the curve on that. The offshore oil drilling is not going to affect supply for 5 to 7 years . . . JOHN HARWOOD: . . . John McCain's out with a new ad today out in battleground states . . . John McCain returns to that maverick image he had . . . ["Broken" ad plays] HARWOOD: So, Austen, what'd you see,? Are you convinced? . . . GOLDBEE: I didn't see big oil mentioned. I know he got $2 million dollars or so from big oil when he said he was going to be in favor of opening up . . . to offshore oil drilling . . . I'm a little puzzled why, when they got 40 million acres offshore with about 5 times the oil in it, where they're allowed to drill now and they have chosen not to, why we would be giving them another gift of offshore drilling acres where there's a lot less oil. HARWOOD: So how come Doug? DOUGLAS HOLTZ-EAKIN: Well, I mean, Sen. McCain has a comprehensive energy policy designed to solve real problems. A real problem we have is the need for alternatives to imported oil. He's proposed expanding domestic production of oil, Sen. Obama's opposed. He's proposed more natural gas to help our manufacturing and home heating costs, Sen. Obama's opposed. We're going to use our coal, it's our most abundant energy resource, Sen. Obama said no. He's today talking about nuclear power; 45 new plants, clean, zero emissions, you could drive on it at three cents a mile. Sen. Obama's opposed. So, you know, I'm confused by why Sen. Obama describes what went on in Washington as progress. Congress failed completely. They melted down. They left. Nothing got done. If that's his notion of progress we have a problem . . . HALL: . . . I'm going to ask about what a lot of folks are talking about—this gas gauge that the McCain campaign has been passing around, showing that Sen. Obama has the, quote/unquote, "simple idea," and even mocking him in this ad. Some people are saying progress is not pointing these little innuendos and this little back and forth, it is really hammering to the folks at home the policy, the energy policy, both long term and what can happen. Why, why use the gas gauge strategy? Especially when even the US Highway Association says that it is a good idea to make sure your tires're inflated, it will save you some money. HOLTZ-EAKIN: Sen. Obama's words, his speech yesterday revealed that he either doesn't understand the magnitude of this problem or he's just not being straight with the American people. He proposed getting rid of ¼ of oil imports. And the way he proposed doing it, some hybrids, a bio-fuels objective, some more CAFÉ standards would solve about a third of that problem. It's like throwing a gas gauge at it. It's time for real solutions. It's time for people who will, instead of voting for the 2005 energy act which had all the handouts for big oil, will stand up to their party, reach across the aisle, solve problems for real people. That's what John McCain's talking about. This isn't about where your poll numbers are. This is about having alternatives to imported oil, it's a national security threat, it's about having cleaner electricity because we need to solve the global warming problem and it's about having a comprehensive ability to divorce ourselves from the threat of international oil markets. The American people have been held hostage far too long. HARWOOD: Now Doug, Barack Obama was in Ohio today . . . he attacked John McCain pretty directly by linking him to President Bush. Let's take a listen to this . . . BARACK OBAMA: Under Sen. McCain's plan . . . we stay in the same cycle of dependence on oil that got us into this problem in the first place. The oil companies have placed their bets on John McCain . . . HARWOOD: So Doug, in your ad, John McCain says that he would take on big oil, Barack Obama says he's in the pocket of big oil. Talk about that. HOLTZ-EAKIN: John McCain said no to the 2005 Energy Act, which gave the big handouts to big oil. He's proposed repealing all special tax treatment for oil companies. What Sen. Obama is missing— HARWOOD: He's giving them what they want on drilling right? HOLTZ-EAKIN: He's missing the facts on the ground, which are that all the experts say that a comprehensive approach, everything has to be in the mix, oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear power, renewables, the biomasses, the biofuels, that's the center's Lexington project. And it is absolutely important that Sen. Obama understand that American jobs leave this country, jobs that have retirement benefits, health benefits, because we have the second highest corporate tax rate and if wants to attack John McCain for taking care of the American worker, I believe he's on the wrong side of that issue as well. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "big campaign" group. To post to this group, send to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] E-mail [email protected] with questions or concerns This is a list of individuals. It is not affiliated with any group or organization. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
👁 1 💬 0
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
89a4bcc30958de68cd575e73b32ae5b75c44944cd3ccdea779e87db9e3aad694
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!