📄 Extracted Text (305 words)
From: ' (USANYS)" <MIMIMIN>
To: rI (USANYS)"
Cc: Min alMIE >, t'S"
Subject: RE: Epstein catch up
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 20:21:15 +0000
Let's do Wednesday if there is a time could make work by phone.
Original Message
From:
Sent: Stnicki . \ovember 17, 2019 I :tm I'M
To: (USANYS
Cc:
(USANYS)
Subject: Re: Epstein catch up
Sure, happy to catch up — we tried to stop by a couple times on Friday but missed you, so can set a time for this
week. Unfortunately we have conflicts tomorrow from 5:30 on — we could potentially do Wednesday but
will be in White Plains so would have to call in, or if there are available times on Tuesday we could try
for that.
Just as backdrop, the meeting in California did not add any significant information except that we almost
certainly couldn't bring an enticement charge (based on timing / location facts), and she's still not sure whether
she wants to pursue a criminal case so we'll circle back with her attorneys later this month. She also didn't want
to talk about specific conduct at this meeting so we don't have any additional info there. Meanwhile we're
continuing to work on the pile of memos, and I don't think there's any additional update other than that is
coming in for a limited proffer (just talking about her background, to start) a week from Tuesday.
> On Nov 16, 2019, at 21:18, (USANYS) < IMIIM> wrote:
> Can we find a time in the near future to catch up on a few things, including hearing more about your interview
last week? Unfortunately both and I have to be out portions of Monday/Tuesday. Would Monday at 530
work for you guys? If not, can we aim for Wednesday morning. Thanks
> Sent from my iPhone
EFTA00097951
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
8b054ed6e4902a1ea1d07310fe8a89a44b0dd6d8b0c10263c3f2516dedd94346
Bates Number
EFTA00097951
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0