EFTA00626278.pdf

DataSet-9 6 pages 673 words document
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (673 words)
From: Martin Weinberg To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]>, Martin Weinberg Subject: Re: CONFIDENTIAL Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:26:47 +0000 See par 16-19 in the attached. Complaint in Dec 2010. I recall OPR rejected the Cassell Complaint and in some pleading there was a reference to OPRs reluctance to review given overlap of issues pending in ongoing litigation. In March of 2011, there was the Acosta letter. In Aug of 2011 there was a hearing where the petitioners say the recusal or OPR issue was mentioned. I will send you more materials as I access them. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston. MA 02116 This Electronic Message contains information from the Law Office of Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., and may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, please note EFTA00626278 that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. On Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:46 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: slomans self report was in o8 On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Martin Weinberg -MINIM> wrote: My memory is that OPR declined to investigate based on the Cassell Dec 2010 complaint finding that the complaint was the subject of ongoing litigation and that the recusal came later and was based not on Cassell's complaint but on other matters (maybe referred to OPR by Sloman, see last nights pleading and dkt 260, attached, where they refer to a separate time period in Aug 2011. We can track it down - thru their privilege logs (dates), perhaps the unsealed pleadings from last year where we first learned of the officewide recusal. I am quite certain the recusal did not emanate from the Cassell OPR complaint from Dec 2010. >Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. >20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 >Boston, MA 02116 EFTA00626279 >This Electronic Message contains >information from the Law Office of >Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., >and may be privileged. The >information is intended for the >use of the addressee only. If you >are not the addressee, please note >that any disclosure, copying, >distribution, or use of the >contents of this message is >prohibited. EFTA00626280 >On Saturday, November 15, 2014 10:32 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: >it says that the opr declined to investigate. ?? why then the office recusal >On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Martin Weinberg <=1.IM> wrote: >The 12-19-07 letter at pg 2 references the USAO view of CVRA (referred to in last nights pleading at pg 10). See also the 12-6-07 Sloman letter also relied on to set forth the USAO position on CVRA. »Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. >> >>20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 >> >> »Boston, MA 02116 »This Electronic Message contains >>information from the Law Office of EFTA00626281 »Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., >> >>and may be privileged. The >> >> >>information is intended for the >>use of the addressee only. If you >> >> »are not the addressee, please note >> >> »that any disclosure, copying, >>distribution, or use of the »contents of this message is >> »prohibited. >-- > please note >The information contained in this communication is >confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may >constitute inside information, and is intended only for >the use of the addressee. It is the property of >JEE >Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this EFTA00626282 >communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited >and may be unlawful. If you have received this >communication in error, please notify us immediately by >return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and >destroy this communication and all copies thereof, >including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediate EFTA00626283
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
8baea0e00bf6a16a234c1f172818a98c42fa221be7a09e05c8efd768e9fca3af
Bates Number
EFTA00626278
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
6

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!