EFTA02494350.pdf
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (197 words)
From: Peter Attia <
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 11:05 PM
To: Jeffrey E.
Subject: No way!
Ok, I did the following experiment&g=230;
Stood mid-plane on one foot and clos=d my eyes... no problem. Perfectly still! Easy
Tried the same stunt at the rear. Co=ldn't do it! Too much movement.
You were right. How the hell do I fl= so many miles on that equipment and not know that!?
I went up the very front of the plan= and the effect was present, but not as much as the rear.
I told the flight attendants, both o= whom had flown on 27s long ago. They agreed with the observation (though =idn't
appreciate the physics).
They did also note that the 57 and 6=, in turbulence are smoother than the 37.
So here is question for you... h=ve you looked at Airbus?
Peter Attia Nutrition Science Initiative (NuSI) <http://www.nusi.or=/> I President 4=pan>650=465-4504 (m) I 858-
914-54=5 (o) I www.nusi.org <http://ww=.nusi.org/>
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mai= is confidential and intended only for the recipients listed above. If you=have received
this e-mail in error, please delete it immediately and inform the sender of the error or contact <=
href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]>
EFTA_R1_01617913
EFTA02494350
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
8ce464033109236195e89c681b65c37d8a8a4de05b03d818cecd32205235196e
Bates Number
EFTA02494350
Dataset
DataSet-11
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0