EFTA00740231
EFTA00740233 DataSet-9
EFTA00740235

EFTA00740233.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 565 words document
P17 V16 P19 V11 D6
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (565 words)
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Lisa Randall Subject: Re: Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:35:45 +0000 thanks , question , what does it look like if time is running backward , wouldn't it be decelerating„ into flat space from the singularity outward„ therefore explosion than expansion. but always slowing after crossing the horizon . looking in reverse it appears things accelerate as they approach„ charged would be as a result of the deceleration. On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Lisa Randall < > wrote: Hi Jeffrey. It was interesting-as always. For your question, let's first straighten out that there are 3 types of bhs we might be discussing: Schwarschild, charged, and Kerr. I didn't say much about Kerr--I mostly discussed charged-- since they are changing with time and a bit more complicated but indeed they have 2 horizons (just like charged black holes). Two horizon scenario means time and space switch twice so at singularity you are back to ordinary time space identification. So let's first just consider Schwarschild (uncharged, not rotating). In that case you are on the right track. Reversing time and coming from the singularity, it pretty much looks like a 2d big bang scenario (with the other 2d in a compact sphere). Space expands out until you reach the horizon and eventually goes over into flat space. It's not really accelerated expansion but still somewhat along lines you suggested. If there are two horizons (charged black hole case) and you are in between them (we called this Whoville becuase it looks like space has shrunk to zero but actually spacetime has not and there is a finite time between them so there's a whole world invisible to the outside) what happens is you alternate between big bang and big crunch in the full extended spacetime. Jeffrey Epstein wrote: Lisa . thanks„ for your time,and patience if i understand the Kerr equations , and your explanation correctly , time and space appear to exchange coordinates , inside a black hole. , that assumes that time is unidirectional. doesn't it appear that if you ran negative time , it would look like any other explosive transaction. great acceleration. emenating from the second horizon outward slowing to a mere expansion . It would appear that " time" got shot out of the black hole. created by a space collapse at the singularity. *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00740233 The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00740234
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
8d633da18b6d2d31ef6c5576f249d405f8728568707f48853719d6b60efe6052
Bates Number
EFTA00740233
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!