📄 Extracted Text (854 words)
rgl POLITICS
The Sequester and the Tea Party Plot
Robert Reich: 03/01/2013
Imagine a plot to undermine the government of the United States, to destroy much of its capacity to do
the public's business, and to sow distrust among the population.
Imagine further that the plotters infiltrate Congress and state governments, reshape their districts to
give them disproportionate influence in Washington, and use the media to spread big lies about the
government.
Finally, imagine they not only paralyze the government but are on the verge of dismantling pieces of it.
Far-fetched? Perhaps. But take a look at what's been happening in Washington and many state capitals
since Tea Party fanatics gained effective control of the Republican Party, and you'd be forgiven if you see
parallels.
Tea Party Republicans are crowing about the "sequestration" cuts beginning today (Friday). "This will be
the first significant tea party victory in that we got what we set out to do in changing Washington," says
Rep. Tim Huelskamp (Kan.), a Tea Partier who was first elected in 2010.
Sequestration is only the start. What they set out to do was not simply change Washington but
eviscerate the U.S. government -- "drown it in the bathtub," in the words of their guru Grover Norquist -
- slashing Social Security and Medicare, ending worker protections we've had since the 1930s, eroding
civil rights and voting rights, terminating programs that have helped the poor for generations, and
making it impossible for the government to invest in our future.
Sequestration grew out of a strategy hatched soon after they took over the House in 2011, to achieve
their goals by holding hostage the full faith and credit of the United States -- notwithstanding the
Constitution's instruction that the public debt of the United States "not be questioned."
To avoid default on the public debt, the White House and House Republicans agreed to harsh and
arbitrary "sequestered" spending cuts if they couldn't come up with a more reasonable deal in the
interim. But the Tea Partiers had no intention of agreeing to anything more reasonable. They knew the
only way to dismember the federal government was through large spending cuts without tax increases.
Nor do they seem to mind the higher unemployment their strategy will almost certainly bring about.
Sequestration combined with January's fiscal cliff deal is expected to slow economic growth by 1.5
percentage points this year - dangerous for an economy now crawling at about 2 percent. It will be even
worse if the Tea Partiers refuse to extend the government's spending authority, which expires March 27.
1iPage of 2
EFTA00611931
A conspiracy theorist might think they welcome more joblessness because they want Americans to be
even more fearful and angry. Tea Partiers use fear and anger in their war against the government --
blaming the anemic recovery on government deficits and the government's size, and selling a poisonous
snake-oil of austerity economics and trickle-down economics as the remedy.
They likewise use the disruption and paralysis they've sown in Washington to persuade Americans
government is necessarily dysfunctional, and politics inherently bad. Their continuing showdowns and
standoffs are, in this sense, part of the plot.
What is the President's response? He still wants a so-called "grand bargain" of "balanced" spending cuts
(including cuts in the projected growth of Social Security and Medicare) combined with tax increases on
the wealthy. So far, though, he has agreed to a gross imbalance -- $1.5 trillion in cuts to Republicans'
$600 billion in tax increases on the rich.
The President apparently believes Republicans are serious about deficit reduction, when in fact the Tea
Partiers now running the GOP are serious only about dismembering the government.
And he seems to accept that the budget deficit is the largest economic problem facing the nation, when
in reality the largest problem is continuing high unemployment (some 20 million Americans unemployed
or under-employed), declining real wages, and widening inequality. Deficit reduction now or in the near-
term will only make these worse.
Besides, the deficit is now down to about 5 percent of GDP -- where it was when Bill Clinton took office.
It is projected to mushroom in later years mainly because healthcare costs are expected to rise faster
than the economy is expected to grow, and the American population is aging. These trends have little or
nothing to do with government programs. In fact, Medicare is far more efficient than private health
insurance.
I suggest the President forget about a "grand bargain." In fact, he should stop talking about the budget
deficit and start talking about jobs and wages, and widening inequality - as he did in the campaign. And
he should give up all hope of making a deal with the Tea Partiers who now run the Republican Party.
Instead, the President should let the public see the Tea Partiers for who they are -- a small, radical
minority intent on dismantling the government of the United States. As long as they are allowed to
dictate the terms of public debate they will continue to hold the rest of us hostage to their extremism.
2IPage of 2
EFTA00611932
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
8df206f9cc9191d7e7df020a74c99fe8f3f97da74f7a18dca8443fe03fca2305
Bates Number
EFTA00611931
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2
Comments 0