EFTA02613948.pdf

From: 1 <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 10:49 AM To: Xavier CARTRON; Kifah Laham Subject: Re: sorry, does that mean kifah alone on skype thi= week? ok with me , but would like to understand. 40=A0 please provde an agenda for the call. . I know =ou said as it is your co that you are responsible . i am not casting blame= to date. I have not one u=eful or accurate drawing. we will discuss torether. . O= Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 5:54 AM Xavier CARTRON wro=e: Dear J effrey Thank you for your answer. We w=ll follow your precision and I feel it is clear. Kifah will assume the Skype Fri=ay or Thursday And the next week we will be to=ether during all the week so I suggest to organize some Skype.</=> Best regards De :1<[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation=gmail.com» Envoye : mardi 27 novembre 2018 21:46 A : Xavier CARTRON >; Kifah Laham <[email protected] <mailto:klaham@xaviercartron.=r» Objet : Jeffrey I have read your remarks about =he project. EFTA_R1_01811824 EFTA02613948  First of all I would like to sp=cify that I fully assume the paternity of the study. No project came out o= my agency without my approval. I assume all the errors, the main one being that I first study the implementation of the blocks and=not details and I beg you to accept my apologies. This is not professional=on my part. I just would like to give you s=me explanation about my misunderstanding. I am happy to have a call on thurs or friday. 1-The access indicated as Priva= entrance was for me a secondary access. I wanted to make a main access to=+15.50. The visit of the house had to understand by this level and the further we go in the house the more we are privative (k=owing that we are in a semi-private villa) Your note for the view of St Jo=n and the windy space is perfectly justified but because of the double use=of access this parameter seemed acceptable to me. I take note of that. Regarding the toilet again we have not done a detailed =ob and this is not correct on our part I thought that these minor aspects =ould be studied in the following phases. We are in a very preliminary phas=. 1 the service entrrance is r=ght off the dock the first think anyone sees? if i=want to go to my room , it is silly to walk through the entire house= . . it shares a very steep road with servie 4 mete=s away. the angles views are ALL WRONG exce=t for the pool. not sure how this happened again. especailly =iven the current layout , dictates the best views. and they are NE ..C24k North is already bad and yours are worse. my bath faces GSJ , and=not the bvi. . it is low ugly and is intersected by the corner of th= library. 2- The cinema we know perfectly=well the noise nuisance of a cinema for that it is enough to make a double=sealed box and to create SAS, the technical aspect in projection or retro-projection too. For the number of places the plan w=s more indicative. None of this was detailed and I understand your wrath. =n the other hand the height was taken into account since we had planned a =ateral ramp which allowed us to gain the height not necessary.\ The cinema makes zero =ense there are doors that open to light. doors that open to no=se there is a sitting room above. pipes air =on , all silly ,. . toilets opening dir=ctly into the movie area??! with both light and sound. =wice as many seats as requested 3 times. 3-The 2 toilets noted, but for = pool area, hall, sitting, pool area, loggia terrace of 1500m 24)=A6. it does not seem extravagant to have 2 restrooms.=/p> 1 the toilets are next to on= another in my home. no guests . and they op=n on to the sitting area directly , awful. =C24> i dont want to see someone come out of the toilet. . 4-The toilet of the room we spo=e more implantation than operation. The big window totally agrees like we =id not study the facades, this point would have been studied with the architectural composition. 2 EFTA_R1_01811825 EFTA02613949  I do not open my wind=w in the bedrroom but need to in a desk room 5-this point has to be clarifie= because I did not understand. the view of her rooms are ugly ugly u=ly,, on a great island - again the angles are all wrong AGAIN. making designing on the computer misleading...AO 6-The dimensions of the dressin= room and the absence of light I have no comments 7-the stairs of the office to y=ur room exposed to the wind. I agree with you it's exactly the same di=tance between your current room and the office but now you're protected, we have not developed enough. the angles maint=nace. wind. rain sun. all silly . 8-Service access to the entranc= this point has been added to explain the maintenance of the terraces. And I think the terrace gardens=are not a good concept on our part. Indeed if you want to have a heavy mai=tenance this concept is not suitable, it requires light engin. And this problem will be similar with the patios.au> if there are to be trees...AO bushes how do they get there , exce=t by machine.? 9-The number of elevator seems =o me consistent it was to reduce the flow (1semi private elevator, 1 priv=te elevator, 1service elevator) for a villa of 2000m2 this is nothing extravagant. I am always happy with extra=agance, there is no consistant electric power ..A0 asking for people getting stuck in an elevator on an island...AO . super silly. please no=e The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 3 EFTA_R1_01811826 EFTA02613950 conversation-id 320925 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1543402117 flags 8590195713 remote-id 875997 4 EFTA_R1_01811827 EFTA02613951