EFTA01977393.pdf

To: Kirschner, Elyse Fran: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 4/26/2013 5:27:31 PM is it possible that the only reason that ap iv ltd was added as an Ip. was to make sure that all entities were not disregarded for tax purposes, and that a partnership requires at least two entites,? ? even though it is a sub s , for 1p purposes i believe it qualfires as a non disregarded entity, any memories? *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return c-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA_R1_00463903 EFTA01977393