EFTA02402907.pdf

From: David Sauvage < Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:40 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: I'm confused. You did an experiment with 200 girls whe=e you held their hands and rating them? Or that's what you're sugg=sting for me? On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:30 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]=ta» wrote: y=u dont have to be a scientist to underatnd the concept of proof. ..A0 does massage work? not a science question=, but some think it does. can you prove to anyone that y=ur intuitive abilities are repeatable. verifiable, =. probably not. but is ok. with vast experie=ce , chinese doctors can tell if someones kidneys are working properly ,=C240 the eyes are a little dull and yellow, its not sci=nce but a pretty good predictor. . the other experiment =ou can try if you want is hold their hands. write down what yo= feel. , and afterwards have them choose which bes= describes their charcateristics. I did this with =00 girls. each one had to rate the accuracy of diagnosisi on a=scale of 1.10. the results ranged from 3.10.=C2Q however, the written diagnosis w=s exactly the same for each, no one like the results . =eliveing is more fun On Tue, Aug 16, 2016=at 9:57 AM, David Sauvage < 1 <mailto: > w=ote: I don't =ind anything you're saying - I am definitely not a scientist, don'= claim to be, and don't know much about experiments and design. <=div> I feel like it'd be good to talk it out? I say=what I can do, and somebody who knows science tells me how we can test tha=, until we arrive at a solution that works both ways? Sent fr=m my mobile device On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:44 AM, jeffrey E. =lt;jeevacation@=mail.com <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: I like you, I am trying to be kind, that is not scie=ce. . if you make people feel better and no one is injured , a=l the best to you. how about being blindfold=d and guessing their name. the outcome must be verifiable, 4>=AO not you are shy, sometimes. angry other times .40=AO the trick of mentalists that do much better than that. they=could take a strength finder test, and then you could take it with a=pathy for them, there are 100 questions see if you=got the more than 80 percent right. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:24 AM, =avid Sauvage <mailtoa > wrote: EFTA_R1_01441147 EFTA02402907  Jeffrey, Just an additional thought. A vision, actually-- What=if I did readings blindfolded? So I held someone's hand and felt into =hem. With such limited visual/tactile information, it would be a real test=of my empathic abilities. It would almost validate "the sixth sense.&=uot; Then maybe we could compare my ability to re=d people with an average person's ability to read people? criv> Just brainstorming here... Very=best, David On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:28 AM, David Sauvage <mailto > wrote: I would love to do that. Definitely has higher p=obability of success. Sent from my mobile device=/div> On Aug 15, 2016, at 8:52 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]<=a» wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 201= at 10:32 PM, David Sauvage <mailto: »=wrote: Hi Jeffrey and G=no, Earlier today, I sat down with 15 pictures and 15 n=mes and tried to match them. It turned out to be quite a struggle -- prima=ily because people were very similar. For instance, I'd have descripti=ns like this: Shy but relatively happy on the out=ide Filled with frustration and anxiety Burning with r=ge deep down But out of the 15 people, that could=vaguely describe 3 or 4 them. So my matching ending up looking like a conv=luted chart. What I concluded was that I ne=d a bit more help designing this experiment. Ideally, rather than matching=15 names to pictures, I have a bunch of binary decisions (A or B). One wou=d expect me to get 50% right. IF the people are emotionally different enou=h (happy v. sad, for instance) I hypothesize I will do considerably better=than chance. Does that make sense? 2 EFTA_R1_01441148 EFTA02402908  I have started=to go down this road with my friend at NYU. Happy to discuss with Gino as =ell. And of course, happy to submit to MRI =achines and the like to figure what's happening on that end. Open to any and all thoughts. Science, clearly, is not my g=ft. Very best, David On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1=49 PM, David Sauvage < =span style="font-size:12.8px">Hi Jeffrey, Sorry it took a beat to respond. This =eekend, when I have space and time, I'll ask a friend to lay out some =ictures and names and see how I do. And I'll report back what I learn.=C24) I've been thinking about this for a while -- and I do feel w= ultimately need a more rigorous experiment. But I like your idea, at leas= to start, of just giving it a good and seeing. Great meeting you. David <=1-> Sent from my mobile deviceadiv> On Aug 7, 2016, at 6:22 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]</=» wrote: =avid, if you can do the name to photo test. in a 2= picture test. it could be an interesting begining,4>=A0 , I suggst you take twenty women all availbel o= google or facebook and try. , <=iv> 40=A0 please note The information=contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client=privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for=br>the use of the addressee. It is the property of 3 EFTA_R1_01441149 EFTA02402909  JEE Unauthorized =se, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is =trictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this co=munication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or b= e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies the=eof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 4>=A0 please note The information contained in this communication is<=r>confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute insid= information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is =he property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be un=awful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify =s immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destro= this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved +=AO please note The information contained in this communication is<=r>confidential, may be attorney- client privileged, may constitute insid= information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is =he property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of thiscommunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be un=awful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify =s immediately by 4 EFTA_R1_01441150 EFTA02402910  return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destro= this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. =opyright -all rights reserved 4>=A0 please note The information contained i= this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged,=may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use =f the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclos=re or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly pro=ibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication =n error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to =a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">[email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, inc=uding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved 5 EFTA_R1_01441151 EFTA02402911