EFTA02639358.pdf

From: Valeria Chomsky < Sent: Saturday, July 7, 2018 6:01 PM To: jeffrey E. Cc: Noam Chomsky Subject: My view of the situation The three children believe that all Noam's money,=not only from the marital Trust, but also from the IRAs belongs to them, b=cause it was made when Noam was married to their mother. </=iv> But not only from the time their marriage lasted, b=cause after Noam and his second wife had been married, Harry once flew fro= California to complain that royalties even of a new book that Noam wrote =fter being married to his second wife should NOT come to the second wife).=C2 And the book publication was delayed and all sorts of legal difficul=ies and pressure from Max to have the book only under Noam's name -- w=th Deborah's endorsement, until Gene Landy stood up in the case. =div> Therefore, in their minds, all the money should be inhe=ited by them. In the will that Max pr=posed, the second wife would receive $25,000, and even the remaining money=from bank accounts should go to the Noam Chomsky Revocable Trust. At=the time the bank account was being used only as an account for making pay=ents. So it had only the exact amount for payments. At the time, before Noam and his second wife sold the apartment in Cambr=dge (that was bought after Noam and his second wife had been married -- bt= that it was not allowed by Max to be bought jointly in Noam's and his=second wife's name) and all the tangible assets including, sheets, pil=owcases, glasses, silverware, books, objects, rugs, furniture and all its =ontent, as Max wrote, would also go to the NCRT. Therefore, includin= things that Noam and his second wife had acquired together. The document stated that then all tangible assets would be sold=and the money would be reverted to the NC Revocable Trust, that would have=become at that point irrevocable. The NC Revocable Trust has the three chi=dren as its beneficiaries. Harry was nominated tr=stee of the marital trust. He now controls the other trustee, Max.</=iv> The IRA has been the main source of income and Noam=n39;s children want it to be the only source of income, preserving the mar=tal trust intact for themselves. After Noam=realized that the gifts to his children and payments of their expenses fro= the IRA, plus our own expenses were depleting the IRA in taxes that are b=ing paid also from the IRA, he stopped the gifts to 10 family members. =A0 The idea is that Noam uses only the IRA fo= all expenses and taxes, since Noam designated one of the IRAs as the inhe=itance to his second wife. Interestingly they want to make sure that=there are no current gifts to the second wife. Maybe because they wa=t to be able to contest the will, saying that they -- Noam's children =- were excluded from Noam's inheritance. The only reason I can s=e why they would care if there are gifts being made to the second wife is =hat this would diminish their portion in the inheritance that they can cla=m from the IRA. Otherwise, what difference EFTA_R1_01871666 EFTA02639358 would it make if th= second wife receives it now or later? And a possible claim for the =RA is the same reason to control our expenses, requesting financial inform=tion. The main purpose of all this is to collect =oam's and his second wife's financial information to construct the=r own stories/cases. Therefore, if even Noam provides all the financ=al information, they won't release more money from the marital trust t=an what they have already decided, and this, only if the conditions they e=tablished, such as signing releases for them for their wrongdoing will be =atisfied. The whole thing is about ha=ing control of our lives and see how much we spend in the market and be ab=e to denounce that we are spending too much here or there and that we are =ot living according to the "family's standards" and that the= have to intervene. Crazy! =br> Valeria PS: Please correct me if I am=wrong. Forwarded message From: jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gm=il.com» Date: Sa=, Jul 7, 2018 at 9:07 AM Subject: Fwd: Marital Trusts To: Noam Choms=y , Valeria Chomsky the gifts to third parties are a refence to valeria =AO AGAIN!!! . he should not be allowed to sl=p away . and abdicate his past or present responsibilites. =AO you need to send a strong response. . =AO You are trustee and have been for many years. I belie=e that trying to avoid fufilling those responsiblites by delay, and repea=ed questions re gifts, which we have answered a numner of times =AO is unacceptable. . there is over 2 million dollars in the trust .=so pretending that the concern is for my future , is clearly untrue. =C2 having the trust income payouts being less than 10k per year a= you and harry have paid expenses to which i was never consulted is outrag=ious, Forwarded message - - From: Richard Kahn Date: Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 7:46 AM<=r>Subject: Fwd: Marital Trusts To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. =75 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor <https://maps.google.com/?q=575-Elexington+Avenue,+4th+Fl=or+New+York,+NY+10022&entry=gmail&source=g> href="https://maps.google.com/?q=575+Lexington+Avenue,+4th+Floor+New+=ork,+NY+10022&entry=gmail&source=g" target="_blank">New York= NY 10022 Phone 212-971-1306 Fax 646-350-0954 Cell 917-414-7584 2 EFTA_R1_01871667 EFTA02639359 Begin forwarded messag=: From: Max Kohlenber Date: July 7, 2018 at 7:43:24 AM EDT =o: 'Noam Chomsky' < Cc: 'Richard Kah=' < Subject: Marital Trusts Noam — Thank you for your reply. As you indic=te that you are not being represented by counsel I will reply directly to =ou, with a copy to Rich (as you suggest). Please consider: 1. As you know, Harry's attorney has comm=nced a legal action that is intended to facilitate my resignation and the =ppointment of a successor trustee to take my place. Since you've wanted me removed for some ti=e and since I've said (from the first time you and I met) that I o=ly wanted to serve as trustee if all the family members wanted me to serve= I'm looking forward to resigning as soon as the court determines how I am to do so and how my successor is to be selected. 3. To the extent that you want to push forward wh=le I remain the trustee, let me again state the basis for financial disclo=ure by you. It is that, as trustee, I owe a duty to you and I owe a duty to your children (as the =emainder beneficiaries of the trusts). For the present my primary du=y is to you and it is to distribute to you all income earned by the trusts= net of expenses, and to distribute to you (or pay on your behalf) additional monies as reasonably needed t= the extent that your income from other sources is not sufficient to suppo=t your reasonable expenses. Notwithstanding your statement that "As for the claim about concern for my later years, that has been thoro=ghly refuted" it has not been refuted in the context of my trusteeship and it remains my=duty to consider distributions in light of the possibility that you will h=ve a reasonable need for distributions from the trust for many more years,=and perhaps in increasing amounts, depending on your circumstances in the future. </=pan> 5. As for the specifics of disclosure, what I nee= to consider is (a) what your income was in 2017, since that was the basis=for the tax payments you seek to have reimbursed, (b) what your income is likely to be this year an= going forward, (c) what your expenses were in 2017 and are likely to be i= 2018, and (d) whether any of your income (or other resources) are being u=ed for purposes that the trust cannot support (such as gifts to third parties). So far, Rich has pr=vided me with some rough information about your 2017 expenses. There=are some gaps in that information, but nothing that can't be clear=d up pretty easily (I think). Rich has also assured me that you have not made any gifts that have diminished your resources an= I assume you would confirm that to me. What I don't have at this point is enough information about your in=ome, so that I can consider what the gap is between your expenses and your=income, which is the gap the trusts might help to close up. With res=ect to your income in 2017, all I can see is that your income tax obligations seem to be much higher than they were pre=iously. I'm assuming that reflects a jump in income from (i)=the profit made on the sale of the condominium, and (ii) large withdrawals=from your IRA. If you want to provide me with 3 EFTA_R1_01871668 EFTA02639360 more information (bearing in mind what I noted in item #3, above) then inf=rmation about your 2017 income and what your income is likely to be this y=ar is what I most need. </=pan> I hope this is helpful and will wait to hear=more from you and/or Rich. Max A. Max Kohlenberg Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP<=> One Financial Plaza — Suite 1600<=u> Providence, Rhode Island 02903=/span> Direct: Main: Fax: /p> www.hekblaw.com <http://www.hekblaw.com/> =/u> This email and any attachments thereto are i=tended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legal=y privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notifi=d that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any a=tachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this=email in error, please immediately notify me by return email and permanently delete the original and any copy of thi= message or attachment. Thank you. From: Noam Chomsky 4 EFTA_R1_01871669 EFTA02639361  Sent: Friday, July 06, 2018 8:53 PM To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: Re: Marital Trust I am not represented=on this issue, so you can send the information to me directly, copying Ric=ard Kahn. Noam On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 4:24 AM, Max Kohlenberg «= href="mailto target="_blank' > wrote: Noam — Thanks for your message and your inquiry. =AO I would like to reply in some detail, but before I do so please tell me whether you are now represented by legal counsel. =f you are then I believe I'm obliged to copy your counsel on our e=changes. I would also plan on copying Rich Kahn, since my last commu=ications about distributions to you from the trusts have been with him. Please also bear in mind that since (accordi=g to Rich) you are preparing to bring a legal action against me, I have been in contact with my firm's malpractice insu=ance carrier. As my exchanges with you may also need to be reviewed =ith our carrier that may delay (and/or limit) my responses.<=> Max A. Max Kohlenberg Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP<=span> One Financial Plaza — Suite 1600 Providence, Rhode Island 02903=u> Direct: <=u> Main: 5 EFTA_R1_01871670 EFTA02639362  Fax: /P> <mailto www.hekblaw.com <http://www.hekblaw.com/> This email and any attachments thereto are i=tended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. =f you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notifie= that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any at=achments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me by "return email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this messa=e or attachment. Thank you. From: Noam Chomsky (mailto <mailto >1 Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 7:53 PM To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: Marital Trust Max, I presume it is clear that the recent proposal trans=itted by Harry's lawyer that I should be satisfied with a handout =f 100k a year from the Marital Trust is too disgraceful for comment. I would like to know what further info=mation you require for reimbursement for tax payment. We have previously t=ansmitted a great deal of financial information in order for you to reimbu=se our taxes, including proof of payment and more. Exactly what more do you require, and with what justi=ication? We see little reason that you cannot act on the information=already provided. As for the claim about concern for my later =ears, that has been thoroughly refuted. Noam 6 EFTA_R1_01871671 EFTA02639363  =please note The information contained in this communication is =onfidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside i=formation, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the=property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this c=mmunication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlaw=ul. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us =mmediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy t=is communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. cop=right -all rights reserved 7 EFTA_R1_01871672 EFTA02639364