EFTA00971402.pdf

DataSet-9 3 pages 880 words document
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (880 words)
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacationggmail.com> To: Melanie Spinella Subject: Fwd: Pour-over and GRATs Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:23:48 +0000 now six weeks old Forwarded message From: Alan S Halperin Date: Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:00 AM Subject: Re: Pour-over and GRATs To: Ada Clapp Cc: Eileen Alexanderson , Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Jessica Soojian Suppose the GRAT pours over into one of the existing trusts, say the 1997 Trust. When the Heritage Trust eventually is ready, the Trustee of the 1997 Trust will decant into the Heritage Trust. That decanting could include not only the assets held at that time, but any future receipts. I need to review the documentation by which Leon acquired his BFP interest from the 2006 Trust to see if we need to address any restrictions. I will revert. Jeffrey, how much is Leon transferring? IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Click Here for More Information Alan S. Halperin I Partner Paul. Weiss. Rifkind. Wharton 8. Garrison LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas I New York. NY 10019-6064 (212 373-3313 Direct Phone (212) 492-0313 (Direct Fax) From: 'Ada Clapp' < > To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <eevacation mail.com> Cc: 'Melanie Spinelle . Alexanderson' Alan S I-IalperintPaullNeiss@PaulWeiss Date: 09127/2013 09:52 AM Subject: Re: Pour-over and GRATs EFTA00971402 Good morning Jeffrey, I understand that you want to move quickly (though perhaps not all the nuances for your timing) but I am wondering whether we have thoroughly considered the timing of the pour-over? Does it perhaps makes sense to do the pour-over after you have received a favorable advisory opinion on the substation for your client and we decide how to move forward with Leon's substation. Two reasons to consider waiting for your client's ruling: I. If we do the substation in the 2006 Trust (which will disappear), what gets decanted into the Heritage Trust is the art. Nice and clean --no need to do a substitution in the Heritage Trust that might draw attention if we decide to move forward on someone else's ruling. 2. The substitution language cited in the petition for the ruling request is the Weil language contained in the 2006 Trust. The Heritage Trust contains different substitution language. We don't know how much the language will factor into the Advisory Opinion. Might make it harder to rely on someone else's opinion if we decide to move forward on that basis. What do you think? Ada Clapp Black Family Partners do Apollo Management 9 W 57th Street numw vnd, Nv unto IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to IRS regulations, I inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any person or entity for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax related penalties imposed by any governmental tax authority, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter discussed herein. I advise you to consult with an independent tax advisor on your particular tax circumstances. This communication, and any attachment, is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that further dissemination of this communication and its attachments is prohibited. Please delete all copies of this communication and its attachments and notify me immediately that you have received them in error. On Sep 27, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: lets prepare the new grats and pourover asap. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of EFTA00971403 Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00971404
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
9105629846aa6b3dd1de50e18667c8cf8f04cf3f6b96310e003a4a4d4235797c
Bates Number
EFTA00971402
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
3

Community Rating

Sign in to rate this document

📋 What Is This?

Loading…
Sign in to add a description

💬 Comments 0

Sign in to join the discussion
Loading comments…
Link copied!