👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (880 words)
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacationggmail.com>
To: Melanie Spinella
Subject: Fwd: Pour-over and GRATs
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:23:48 +0000
now six weeks old
Forwarded message
From: Alan S Halperin
Date: Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: Pour-over and GRATs
To: Ada Clapp
Cc: Eileen Alexanderson , Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Jessica Soojian
Suppose the GRAT pours over into one of the existing trusts, say the 1997 Trust. When the Heritage
Trust eventually is ready, the Trustee of the 1997 Trust will decant into the Heritage Trust. That
decanting could include not only the assets held at that time, but any future receipts.
I need to review the documentation by which Leon acquired his BFP interest from the 2006 Trust to
see if we need to address any restrictions. I will revert.
Jeffrey, how much is Leon transferring?
IRS Circular 230 disclosure:
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax
advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be
used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed
herein.
Click Here for More Information
Alan S. Halperin I Partner
Paul. Weiss. Rifkind. Wharton 8. Garrison LLP
1285 Avenue of the Americas I New York. NY 10019-6064
(212 373-3313 Direct Phone (212) 492-0313 (Direct Fax)
From: 'Ada Clapp' < >
To: "Jeffrey Epstein" <eevacation mail.com>
Cc: 'Melanie Spinelle . Alexanderson' Alan S I-IalperintPaullNeiss@PaulWeiss
Date: 09127/2013 09:52 AM
Subject: Re: Pour-over and GRATs
EFTA00971402
Good morning Jeffrey,
I understand that you want to move quickly (though perhaps not all the nuances for your timing) but I am
wondering whether we have thoroughly considered the timing of the pour-over? Does it perhaps makes sense to
do the pour-over after you have received a favorable advisory opinion on the substation for your client and we
decide how to move forward with Leon's substation. Two reasons to consider waiting for your client's ruling:
I. If we do the substation in the 2006 Trust (which will disappear), what gets decanted into the Heritage Trust is
the art. Nice and clean --no need to do a substitution in the Heritage Trust that might draw attention if we decide
to move forward on someone else's ruling.
2. The substitution language cited in the petition for the ruling request is the Weil language contained in the 2006
Trust. The Heritage Trust contains different substitution language. We don't know how much the language will
factor into the Advisory Opinion. Might make it harder to rely on someone else's opinion if we decide to move
forward on that basis.
What do you think?
Ada Clapp
Black Family Partners
do Apollo Management
9 W 57th Street
numw vnd, Nv unto
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
Pursuant to IRS regulations, I inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including
attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any person or entity for the purpose of
(i) avoiding tax related penalties imposed by any governmental tax authority, or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter discussed herein. I advise you to consult with an
independent tax advisor on your particular tax circumstances.
This communication, and any attachment, is for the intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that
is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
further dissemination of this communication and its attachments is prohibited. Please delete all copies of this
communication and its attachments and notify me immediately that you have received them in error.
On Sep 27, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote:
lets prepare the new grats and pourover asap.
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
EFTA00971403
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that
is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its
attachments and notify us immediately.
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00971404
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
9105629846aa6b3dd1de50e18667c8cf8f04cf3f6b96310e003a4a4d4235797c
Bates Number
EFTA00971402
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
3
💬 Comments 0