📄 Extracted Text (16,711 words)
From: G Maxwell <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 8:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: <no subject>
How old was virginia in 1998 when she claims she started working for you?
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00069
EFTA01186642
From: G Maxwell <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 7:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fw: Daily Mail
Original Message
From: Ross gow <[email protected]>
To: Gmax; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Basham <[email protected]>; Ross Gow <[email protected]>; Ian Ian Maxwell
<[email protected]>; Kevin Maxwell <[email protected]>; Gareth Thompson
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu Mar 1016:29:24 2011
Subject: Re: Daily Mail
Maz is the most devious and cunning of the bunch. However, Editors can pay for people, stories and documents. They
can even pay criminals if it is in the public interest.
Maz can pay who he wants for info but the Yorkshire Ripper for instance, as a convicted criminal, can't sell his
story...unless in public interest cos there was say, a bent detective.
Below is from PCC Code for Editors. It is not well drafted.
15
Witness payments in criminal trials
i) No payment or offer of payment to a witness - or any person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a
witness - should be made in any case once proceedings are active as defined by the Contempt of Court Act 1981.
This prohibition lasts until the suspect has been freed unconditionally by police without charge or bail or the
proceedings are otherwise discontinued; or has entered a guilty plea to the court; or, in the event of a not guilty plea,
the court has announced its verdict.
*ii) Where proceedings are not yet active but are likely and foreseeable, editors must not make or offer payment to any
person who may reasonably be expected to be called as a witness, unless the information concerned ought
demonstrably to be published in the public interest and there is an over-riding need to make or promise payment for
this to be done; and all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure no financial dealings influence the evidence those
witnesses give. In no circumstances should such payment be conditional on the outcome of a trial.
*iii) Any payment or offer of payment made to a person later cited to give evidence in proceedings must be disclosed to
the prosecution and defence. The witness must be advised of this requirement.
16
*Payment to criminals
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00070
EFTA01186643
i) Payment or offers of payment for stories, pictures or information, which seek to exploit a particular crime or to glorify
or glamorise crime in general, must not be made directly or via agents to convicted or confessed criminals or to their
associates —who may include family, friends and colleagues.
ii) Editors invoking the public interest to justify payment or offers would need to demonstrate that there was good
reason to believe the public interest would be served. If, despite payment, no public interest emerged, then the material
should not be published.
Ross Gow
Managing Partner
ACUITY Reputation Limited
23 Berkeley Square
London W11 6HE
Mobile +44 (0) 7778 755 251
Tel +44 (0)20 3008 7788
acuityreputation.com
Sent from my iPad
On 10 Mar 2011, at 16:41, GMAX <[email protected]> wrote:
Actually school means university in the states. I think probably best not to get into the legality or not of sexual
activity of young people and nor is it relevant to JE case as he was in his late 40's at the time of this story..the headline is
deliberately wrong..school adults would have been accurate..
On 3/10/11 3:16 AM, "Brian Basham" <[email protected]> wrote:
We should think about a letter to the editor today. 'School' can mean university. Age of consent in Florida is
complex — see below:
If you are 16-yrs-old, a sexual relationship with someone 18-24is legal in Florida. The two persons involved
must be between 16 and 24.
Florida Statute 794.05
(1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits
a felony of the second degree.
So as soon as you turn 16 you are able to have sexual relations. And you can have sexual relations with a minor
(under 18) until your 24th birthday.
'Females for JE': Disturbing log of telephone calls from schoolchildren found in sex den of Duke's billionaire
friend
2
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00071
EFTA01186644
By Stephen Wright «http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=y&authornamef=Stephen+Wright>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=y&authornamef=Stephen+Wright>
Last updated at 6:30 PM on 9th March 2011
Details of the disturbing lifestyle led by Jeffrey Epstein emerged last night after the Daily Mail uncovered logs of
telephone messages left at his Florida child sex den.
Schoolchildren were among hundreds of callers who apparently rang to arrange massages for the 58-year-old
billionaire friend of Prince Andrew, who was later convicted of child sex offences.
Ghislaine Maxwell, 49-year-old daughter of the disgraced media mogul Robert Maxwell, is named in several
messages.
Disturbing: Messages were found in Florida home of Jeffrey Epstein, left. The billionaire, 58, is a friend of Prince
Andrew, right
In one left for her or 'Sarah', a caller says she 'doesn't know at what time she must come this night for the
massage'.
Other messages for Epstein, the sources of which are not clear, contain such phrases as: 'She has females for
Mr JE' and 'I have a female for him'.
Another with sickening overtones comes from someone called Jeanluc for Epstein: 'He just did a good one —18
years. (She spoke to me and said, "I love Jeffrey")'.
The long list of women is punctuated by regular references to Epstein's celebrity friends including the business
magnate Donald Trump, film producer Harvey Weinstein and magician David Copperfield, referred to as 'Magic David'.
The sheer volume of phone traffic shows the frequency of Epstein's massages, many of which were 'erotic' and
allegedly involved the abused girls.
The evidence is from documents confiscated by police during a criminal investigation into Epstein and seen
yesterday by the Mail.
<image.png>
<image.png>
Logs: Two of the answer phone messages. Miss Maxwell is asked, right, when a girl should give a massage
One message left for Epstein reads: 'She is wondering if 2.30 ok cuz she needs to stay in school.'
It was left in February 2005 — the same year that the mother of a 14-year-old girl alerted police to Epstein's
abuse.
Another note shows that 'Colleen' phoned to tell Epstein: 'Going into class —will be out in 45 min.'
Last night the Daily Mail tried to contact the people whose names and telephone numbers are included in the
logs.
One girl named Jenny, who had left her number, hung up immediately when asked about Epstein.
3
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00072
EFTA01186645
A man listed only as Darren said: 1 have no comment to make on that.'
Today, Prince Andrew was embroiled in further controversy as it was revealed Kazakhstan had asked for his
help in recruiting investors to the country.
The plea came after the former Soviet Republic's President's son-in-law had bought the Prince's former marital
home for £3million above the asking price.
Timur Kulibayev paid £15million for Sunninghill Park but it has remained empty and has been allowed to fall
into disrepair.
Last year the Prince told Hello! magazine: 'It was like any property deal between friends.'
Yesterday he attempted to perform business as usual as he visited an East London school and met rail bosses in
Canary Wharf.
He steadfastly ignored questions from journalists asking whether he was an 'embarrassment to his country' and
would resign from his trade ambassador role as he arrived for a briefing from business executives at the headquarters of
the £15billion train project Crossrail.
Prince Andrew managed to sell Sunninghill Park for £3million more than the asking price
Read more: <http://www.dailymail.co.ukinews/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-
telephone-log.htmlitixzz1GBL6XKcl> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-
damning-telephone-log.htmlffixzz1GBL6XKcl «http://www.dailymail.co.ukinews/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-
Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-
The-damning-telephone-log.html>
From: Ross Gow [ <mailto:[email protected]> mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 10 March 2011 7:48 AM
To: Ross gow
Cc: [email protected]; Ian Maxwell; Kevin Maxwell; Brian Basham; Gareth Thompson;
[email protected]
Subject: Daily Mail
Mail have published phone logs
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html <
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html>
http://www.dailymail.co.ukThews/article-1364171/Females-Jeffrey-Epstein-The-damning-telephone-log.html>
Ross Gow
Managing Partner
ACUITY Reputation Limited
23 Berkeley Square
4
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00073
EFTA01186646
London W1J 6HE
Mobile +44 (0) 7778 755 251
Tel +44 (0)20 3008 7788
<http://acuityreputation.com> acuityreputation.com
Sent from my iPad
On 10 Mar 2011, at 07:35, Ross gow <[email protected] «mailto:[email protected]>
mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
"Epstein's Gulfstream flew in to RAF Marham with him and the Duke's friend Ghislaine Maxwell on board,
before they enjoyed the Duke's hospitality at the Queen's Norfolk estate 20 miles away...."
Ross Gow
Managing Partner
ACUITY Reputation Limited
23 Berkeley Square
London W1J 6HE
Mobile +44 (0) 7778 755 251
Tel +44 (0)20 3008 7788
acuityreputation.com «http://acuityreputation.com> http://acuityreputation.com>
Sent from my iPad
On 9 Mar 2011, at 22:52, Ross Gow <[email protected] «mailto:[email protected]>
mailto:[email protected]» wrote:
Dear Ghislaine
Thank you for your good-humoured patience with us and the legal team today, during what is, understandably,
a testing time.
To confirm:
1) I spoke to Dilenschneider in NYC at length tonight and shared strategy and role definition.
2) we sent agreed statement to Dan Mangan ay NYPost - he's on deadline for a piece on Charlie Sheen/Rob
Lowe and seems to have moved on - for the moment.
3) we will release statement via Press Association and PR Newswire @11.00GMT tmrw and follow up with calls
to those journalists who have written pieces.
5
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00074
EFTA01186647
We will create call log/matrix and advise feedback and sentiment as appropriate tmrw. Please don't hesitate to
call if you have any additional concerns.
Best regards
Ross
Ross Gow
Managing Partner
ACUITY Reputation Limited
23 Berkeley Square
London W11 6HE
Mobile +44 (0) 7778 755 251
Tel +44 (0)20 3008 7788
acuityreputation.com «http://acuityreputation.com> http://acuityreputation.com>
Sent from my iPad
6
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00075
EFTA01186648
From: GMAX <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 10:06 AM
To: Jep'
Subject: <no subject>
--6_3383554032_6208970
charset='ISO-8859-1"
--6_3383554032_6208970
charset="ISO-8859-1"
--6_3383554032_6208970--
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="6_3537634348_644846192"
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not
> understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--6_3537634348_644846192
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
What I need to hang my hat on is the following =E2=80=93 I only need this one pie= ce and I will then go quietly into the
sunset..
What year actually did u meet V =E2=80=93 I am sure her version of dates are wron= g it was just to be able to say she
was 15 =E2=80=93 i=E2=80=99m going to guess summer = August/ Sept =E2=80=9899 or 2000 =E2=80=93 just that
piece alone will allow me to say so= mething that will along w/all the other information will discredit her stor= ies..if it
was =E2=80=9898 then it will have been after her b=E2=80=9Dday as there was n= o party for her..she threw that in to
add =E2=80=98legitimacy=E2=80=99 to her fraudulent= claim..did she have a fake ID to work at Marlargo?? Can you
work full time = at 15 =E2=80=93 she was working full time that much I do remember When did she stop working at M
=E2=80=93 if we could get her employment record th= at would be good
=E2=80=93 she told me she was a masseuse..assume now that that was a lie too to a= dd to her many..
What lies did she tell on her immigration form to australia =E2=80=93 is that get= table? Is that a public document?=20
Can darren tell me anything on her dates? =20
--6_3537634348_644846192
Content-type: text/html;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"> </head> <body> <font face=3D"Calibri,
Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt= ">What I need to hang my hat on is the following =E2=80=93 I
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00076
EFTA01186649
only need this one pi= ece and I will then go quietly into the sunset..<br> What year actually did u meet V =E2=80=93 I
am sure her version of dates are wron= g it was just to be able to say she was 15 =E2=80=93 i=E2=80=99m going to
guess su= mmer August/ Sept =E2=80=9899 or 2000 =E2=80=93 just that piece alone will allow me to s= ay
something that will along w/all the other information will discredit her stories..if it was =E2=80=9898 then it will have =
been after her b=E2=80=9Dday as there was no party for her..she threw that in to a= dd =E2=80=98legitimacy=E2=80=99
to her fraudulent claim..did she have a fake ID to work = at Marlargo?? Can you work full time at
15 =E2=80=93 she was working full time that much I do remember<br> When did she stop working at M =E2=80=93 if
we could get her employment record th= at would be good<br>
=E2=80=93 she told me she was a masseuse..assume now that that was a lie too to a= dd to her many..<br> What
lies did she tell on her immigration form to australia =E2=80=93 is that get= table? Is that a public document?
<br>
Can darren tell me anything on her dates? <br> </span></font> </body> </html>
—8_3537634348_644846192--
2
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00077
EFTA01186650
From: Jeffrey epstein boundary=Apple-Mail-4-669898702 <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:08 AM
To: 'GMAX'
Subject: Re: Vanity Fair
--Apple-Mail-4-669898702
charset=utf-8
--Apple-Mail-4-669898702
charset=utf-8
--Apple-Mail-4-669898702--
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="B_3537537149_1356210193"
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not
> understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--B_3537537149_1356210193
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
He wont ad details but you can try
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:52 PM, GMAX <[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/8/119:49 AM, "J Jep" <[email protected]> wrote:
I would say a paid for story thar was nothing mote than a malicious fabrica= tion =E2=80=930O YOU MEAN INSTEAD OF
ALL OF THIS JUST SAY THAT IT WAS A FABRICATIO= N..WHAT ABOUT SAYING THAT I MET HER WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND
LIVING WITH HER FIA= NCE AND AVOID ALL THE OTHER STUFF
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:42 PM, GMAX <[email protected]> wrote:
MY PROPOSED ANS IN CAPS..PLSE COMMENT
Forwarded Message
From: Ross Gow <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]=
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00078
EFTA01186651
>>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:49:02 -0400
To: G G <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]»
Cc: Brian Basham <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]»
Subject: Vanity Fair
Dear Ghislaine
Klein's questions follow, below. If we are to respond, I would advise we stick to written responses rather than engage via
'phone. Klein has form for story-twisting re Hillary Clinton. Written responses at least give us an audit trail of what was
said.
A lot of this is Mail on Sunday rehash. Klein has our statement, but is offering the chance for further clarification...I get
the feeling he's likely to make unflattering assumptions if we don't give him on the record answers.
Please advise on those questions which you feel you more comfortable answering. We can head him off at the pass on
those and put legal frighteners on him elsewhere.
Just a caveat - we should be aware that there is a chance that anything other than fully robust answers might be
construed as inadvertent admissions of wrongdoing, so we will need legal team to advise on precise wording. Do you
want me to pass this on to Devonshires if you have not already done so...?
best
Ross
Dear Ross,
Here are some fact-checking questions for Ghislaine Maxwell to comment on and answer:
1. Do Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell share a home in London or anywhere else? Do they still see each other?
Does Epstein help support Ghislaine? Her friends tell me that Ghislaine once loved Epstein. Does she still love him?
MS MAXWELL DOES NO SHARE ANY HOMES WITH MR EPSTEIN. MR EPSTEIN DOES NOT SUP= PORT MS MAXWELL IN
ANYWAY. MS MAXWELL HAD INFACT BEEN IN COMMITTED RELATIONS= HIP WITH SOMEONE ELSE FOR THE PAST 7
YEARS
2. The Mail on Sunday published a photograph showing the Duke of York with his arm around Standing
off to one side in the photo was Ghislaine Maxwell. The newspaper said that this photo taken in Ghislaine's London
home. Was it? Did Jeffrey Epstein take the photo? If not, who did?
MS MAXWELL HAS NO RECOLECTION OF THE PHOTO BEING EVEN TAKEN GIVEN WE ARE TA= LKING AN EVENT THAT
ALLEDGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IT WOULD BE SURP=
RISING=20
3. According to Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her as Epstein=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Csex slave=E2=80=9D
when she was 15 years old and arranged for her to see Andrew three times=E2=80=94at Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s
homes in London and New York and on his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James=E2=80=94where, elMsaid,
she=E2=80=99d been =E2=80=9Csexually exploited by Epstein=E2=80=99s adult male eers, including
royalty.=E2=80=9D Would Ghislaine please comment on this assertion by
•
MS MAXWELL MET WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND WAS HIRED AS A MASSUSE. WAS LIVING AT
THE TIME WITH HER FIANCE HAS A PRIOR SEXUAL= HASSARASSMENT SUIT AGAINST OTHER INDIVIDUALS
2
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00079
EFTA01186652
THAT WAS THROWN OUT FOR LACK O= F HER CREDABILITY AND DRUG USE. FINALLY FLED THE US TO
AVOID ARR= EST FOR THEFT. I THINK GIVEN THIS AND OTHER HIGHLY INDICATIVE EVENTS IN HER = LIFE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE
TO BELIEVE ONE WORD OUT OF HER MOUTH. FURTHER THE INCE= NTIVE OF A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY PAID BY A
NEWSPAPER NO DOUBT ADDED TO HER = COLOURFUL =E2=80=98MEMORIES=E2=80=99 WHICH IN FACT ARE NOTHING
BUT MADE UP STORIES.
4. The Mail on Sunday and other newspapers ran the story about Andrew=E2=80=99s rendezvous with
in Ghislaine Maxwell=E2=80=99s London home. These reports said that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell left the
Duke of York and alone for several hours, and that the next morning Ghislaine Maxwell told
hat the Duke had a good time. Would Ghislaine please comment on this story. What did the Duke tell Ghislaine
about his rendezvous with
5. The Mail on Sunday said it had evidence to support story=E2=80=94flight logs from Jeffrey
Epstein=E2=80=99s Boeing 727 and Gulfstream jet. Was Ghislaine Maxwell on these airplanes and who else was
onboard?
AGAIN TO REMEMBER ANY SPECIFIC FLIGHT AND WHO WAS ON BOARD A PLANE FOR EVEN= TS THAT ALEDEGEDLY
TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IS SIMPLY UNREALISITC
6. According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee at Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s Palm Beach estate,
Prince Andrew attended naked pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent girls.
MS MAXWELL CANNOT COMMENT ON WHAT MR ALESSI ALLEDEGDLY SAW OR DID NOT SEE B= UT MS MAXWELL NEVER
SAW THE DUKE IN ANY STATE OF UNDRESS AND HE WAS INDEED A= LWAYS PROPERLY ATTIRED.=20
That's it for now.
I hope that you can arrange for me to speak directly to Ghislaine.
All the best,
Ed
Edward Klein
1085 Park Avenue
5A
New York, NY 10128
Tel. 212.831.5110
Cell. 646.709.7293
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>=20
Ross Gow
Managing Partner
ACUITY Reputation
23 Berkeley Square
London W11 6HE
+44 (0) 203 008 7788
+44 (0) 777 875 5251
3
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00080
EFTA01186653
www.acuityreputation.com <http://www.acuityreputation.com> <http://www.acu=
ityreputation.com>=20
---- End of Forwarded Message
--6_3537537149_1356210193
Content-type: text/html;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8"> </head> <body bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF">
<div>He wont ad details but you can try<br> <br> Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone</div> <divxbr> On Jun 8,
2011, at 3:52 PM, GMAX &It;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">gmax=
[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<div></div>
<blockquote type=3D"cite">
<divxfont face=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style=3D"font-size= :11pt"><br> <br> <br> On 6/8/119:49
AM, "J lep" &It;<a [email protected]"></=
axa href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>>
a>wrote=
:<br>
<br>
</span></font>
<blockquote><font face=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style=3D"fo= nt-size:llpt">I would say a paid for
story thar was nothing mote than a mali= cious fabrication =E2=80=93DO YOU MEAN INSTEAD OF ALL OF THIS JUST SAY
THAT IT WAS= A FABRICATION..WHAT ABOUT SAYING THAT I MET HER WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND LIVING WITH HER
FIANCE AND AVOID ALL TH= E OTHER STUFF<br> <br> Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone<br> <br> On Jun 8,
2011, at 3:42 PM, GMAX &It;<a href=3D"[email protected]"></a><a href=
=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> <br> </span></font> <blockquote><font
face=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style=3D"fo= nt-size:llpt">MY PROPOSED ANS IN CAPS..PLSE
COMMENT<br> <br>
--- Forwarded Message<br>
<b>From: </b>Ross Gow &Itsa href=3D"[email protected]"></a><a href=3D"=
mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> &It;<a href=3D=
"mailto:[email protected]"></a><a href=3D"mailto:ross@acuityreputation=
.com">[email protected]</a>>
><br>
<b>Date: </b>Tue, 7 Jun 201113:49:02 -0400<br>
<b>To: </b>G G &Itsa href=3D"[email protected]"></a><a href=3D"mailto:gmaxl@ell=
max.com">[email protected]</a> &It;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"></a><a h=
ref=3D"mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</a>> >sbr>
<b>Cc: </b>Brian Basham &Itsa href=3D"[email protected]"></a><a href=3D"mai=
Ito:[email protected]">[email protected]</a> &It;<a href=3D"mailto:mail@= brianbasham.com"></a><a
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">mailto:mail@brian=
basham.com</a>> ><br>
4
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00081
EFTA01186654
<b>Subject: </b>Vanity Fair<br>
<br>
Dear Ghislaine<br>
<br>
Klein's questions follow, below. If we are to respond, I would advise<br> we stick to written responses rather than
engage via 'phone. Klein has<br> form for story-twisting re Hillary Clinton. Written responses at least<br> give us an
audit trail of what was said.<br> <br> A lot of this is Mail on Sunday rehash. Klein has our statement, but<br> is offering
the chance for further clarification...I get the feeling<br> he's likely to make unflattering assumptions if we don't give
him on<br> the record answers.<br> <br> Please advise on those questions which you feel you more comfortable<br>
answering. We can head him off at the pass on those and put legal<br> frighteners on him elsewhere.<br> <br> Just a
caveat - we should be aware that there is a chance that<br> anything other than fully robust answers might be
construed as<br> inadvertent admissions of wrongdoing, so we will need legal team to<br> advise on precise wording.
Do you want me to pass this on to<br> Devonshires if you have not already done so...?<br> best<br> Ross<br> <br> Dear
Ross,<br> <br> Here are some fact-checking questions for Ghislaine Maxwell to comment<br> on and answer:<br> <br>
<br> 1. Do Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell share a home in London or<br> anywhere else? Do they still see each
other? Does Epstein help support<br> Ghislaine? Her friends tell me that Ghislaine once loved Epstein. Does<br> she still
love him?<br> <br> MS MAXWELL DOES NO SHARE ANY HOMES WITH MR EPSTEIN. MR EPSTEIN DOES NOT SUP= PORT
MS MAXWELL IN ANYWAY. MS MAXWELL HAD INFACT BEEN IN COMMITTED RELATIONS= HIP WITH SOMEONE ELSE FOR
THE PAST 7 YEARS<br> <br> 2. The Mail on Sunday published a photograph showing the Duke of York<br> with his arm
around Standing off to one side in the= <br> photo was Ghislaine Maxwell. The newspaper said
that this photo taken<br> in Ghislaine's London home. Was it? Did Jeffrey Epstein take the<br> photo? If not,
who did?<br> <br> MS MAXWELL HAS NO RECOLECTION OF THE PHOTO BEING EVEN TAKEN GIVEN WE ARE TA= LKING
AN EVENT THAT ALLEDGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IT WOULD BE SURP= RISING <br> <br> 3. According to
, Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her as<br> Epstein=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Csex slave=E2=80=9D when she
was 15 and arranged for her<=
br>
to see Andrew three times=E2=80=94at Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s homes in London and New<=
br>
York and on his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James=E2=80=94where,<br> Virginia said, she=E2=80=99d been
=E2=80=9Csexually exploited by Epstein=E2=80=99s adult male= <br> peers, including royalty.=E2=80=9D Would
Ghislaine please comment on this<br> assertion by <br> <br> MS MAXWELL MET MS ROBERTS WHEN
SHE WAS 17 AND WAS HIRED AS A MASSUSE.= MS ROBERTS WAS LIVING AT THE TIME WITH HER FIANCE. MS
ROBERTS HAS A PRIOR S= EXUAL HASSARASSMENT SUIT AGAINST OTHER INDIVIDUALS THAT WAS THROWN OUT FOR L=
ACK OF HER CREDABILITY AND DRUG USE.
MS ROBERTS FINALLY FLED THE US TO AVOID ARREST FOR THEFT. I THINK GIVEN TH= IS AND OTHER HIGHLY INDICATIVE
EVENTS IN HER LIFE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEV= E ONE WORD OUT OF HER MOUTH. FURTHER THE INCENTIVE OF A
LARGE AMOUNT OF MONE= Y PAID BY A NEWSPAPER NO DOUBT ADDED TO HER COLOURFUL
=E2=80=98MEMORIES=E2=80=99 WHICH IN FACT ARE NOTHING BUT MADE U= P STORIES.<br> <br> 4. The Mail on
Sunday and other newspapers ran the story about<br> Andrew=E2=80=99s rendezvous with in
Ghislaine Maxwell=E2=80=99s<br> London home. These reports said that Jeffrey Epstein an is aine< r> axwell left
the Duke of York and alone for several<br> hours, and that the next morning Ghislaine Maxwell told
at the Duke had a good time. Would Ghislaine please comment<br> on this story. What did the
Duke tell Ghislaine about his rendezvous<br> with <br> <br> <br> 5. The Mail on Sunday said it had
evidence to support story=E2=80=94flight logs from Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s Boeing 727
and= <br> Gulfstream jet. Was Ghislaine Maxwell on these airplanes and who else<br> was onboard?<br> <br> AGAIN
TO REMEMBER ANY SPECIFIC FLIGHT AND WHO WAS ON BOARD A PLANE FOR EVEN= TS THAT ALEDEGEDLY TOOK
PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IS SIMPLY UNREALISITC<br> <br> 6. According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former
employee<br> at Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s Palm Beach estate, Prince Andrew attended naked<br> pool parties and
was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent<br> girls.<br> <br> MS MAXWELL CANNOT COMMENT ON WHAT MR
ALESSI ALLEDEGDLY SAW OR DID NOT SEE B= UT MS MAXWELL NEVER SAW THE DUKE IN ANY STATE OF UNDRESS AND
HE WAS INDEED A= LWAYS PROPERLY ATTIRED.
<br>
5
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00082
EFTA01186655
<br>
That's it for now.<br>
<br>
I hope that you can arrange for me to speak directly to Ghislaine.<br> <br> All the best,<br> <br> Ed<br> <br> Edward
Klein<br>
1085 Park Avenue<br>
5A<br>
New York, NY 10128<br>
Tel. 212.831.5110<br>
Cell. 646.709.7293<br>
<a href=3D"[email protected]"></a><a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">ed@edw=
ardklein.com</a> &Itsa href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"></a><a href=3D"mailto=
:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</a>>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Ross Gow<br>
Managing Partner<br>
ACUITY Reputation<br>
23 Berkeley Square<br>
London W1J 6HE<br>
+44 (0) 203 008 7788<br>
+44 (0) 777 875 5251<br>
<a href=3D"http://www.acuityreputation.com">www.acuityreputation.com</a> &It= <a
href=30"http://www.acuityreputation.com"></a>ca href=3D"http://www.acuityrepu=
tation.com">http://www.acuityreputation.com</a>> &Itsa href=3D"http:=
//www.acuityreputation.com"></a><a href=3D"http://www.acuityreputation.com">ht=
tp://www.acuityreputation.com</a>>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---- End of Forwarded Message<br>
</span></font></blockquote>
<font face=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style=3D"font-size:llpt= "><br> </span></font></blockquote>
</div> </blockquote> </body> </html>
--B_3537537149_1356210193-
6
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00083
EFTA01186656
From: G Maxwell <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 9:09 AM
To: [email protected]'
Subject: Re: Vanity Fair
Do you have a problem with anything I said.
Original Message ----
From: jeffrey epstein <[email protected]>
To: Gmax
Sent: Wed Jun 0810:08:11 2011
Subject: Re: Vanity Fair
He wont ad details but you can try
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:52 PM, GMAX <[email protected]> wrote:
On 6/8/11 9:49 AM, "J ler)" <[email protected]> wrote:
I would say a paid for story thar was nothing mote than a malicious fabrication -DO YOU MEAN INSTEAD OF ALL
OF THIS JUST SAY THAT IT WAS A FABRICATION..WHAT ABOUT SAYING THAT I MET HER WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND LIVING
WITH HER FIANCE AND AVOID ALL THE OTHER STUFF
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:42 PM, GMAX <[email protected]> wrote:
MY PROPOSED ANS IN CAPS..PLSE COMMENT
Forwarded Message
From: Ross Gow <[email protected] «mailto:[email protected]>
mailto:[email protected]»
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:49:02 -0400
To: G G <[email protected] «mailto:[email protected]> mailto:[email protected]»
Cc: Brian Basham <[email protected] «mailto:[email protected]>
mailto:[email protected]»
Subject: Vanity Fair
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00084
EFTA01186657
Dear Ghislaine
Klein's questions follow, below. If we are to respond, I would advise
we stick to written responses rather than engage via 'phone. Klein has
form for story-twisting re Hillary Clinton. Written responses at least
give us an audit trail of what was said.
A lot of this is Mail on Sunday rehash. Klein has our statement, but
is offering the chance for further clarification...I get the feeling
he's likely to make unflattering assumptions if we don't give him on
the record answers.
Please advise on those questions which you feel you more comfortable
answering. We can head him off at the pass on those and put legal
frighteners on him elsewhere.
Just a caveat - we should be aware that there is a chance that
anything other than fully robust answers might be construed as
inadvertent admissions of wrongdoing, so we will need legal team to
advise on precise wording. Do you want me to pass this on to
Devonshires if you have not already done so...?
best
Ross
Dear Ross,
Here are some fact-checking questions for Ghislaine Maxwell to comment
on and answer:
1. Do Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell share a home in London or
anywhere else? Do they still see each other? Does Epstein help support
Ghislaine? Her friends tell me that Ghislaine once loved Epstein. Does
she still love him?
MS MAXWELL DOES NO SHARE ANY HOMES WITH MR EPSTEIN. MR EPSTEIN DOES NOT SUPPORT MS
MAXWELL IN ANYWAY. MS MAXWELL HAD INFACT BEEN IN COMMITTED RELATIONSHIP WITH SOMEONE ELSE FOR THE
PAST 7 YEARS
2. The Mail on Sunday published a photograph showing the Duke of York
with his arm around Standing off to one side in the
photo was Ghislaine Maxwell. The newspaper said that this photo taken
in Ghislaine's London home. Was it? Did Jeffrey Epstein take the
photo? If not, who did?
MS MAXWELL HAS NO RECOLECTION OF THE PHOTO BEING EVEN TAKEN GIVEN WE ARE TALKING AN
EVENT THAT ALLEDGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IT WOULD BE SURPRISING
3. According to Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her as
Epstein's "sex slave" when she was 15 years old and arranged for her
to see Andrew three times —at Jeffrey Epstein's homes in London and New
2
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00085
EFTA01186658
York and on his private Caribbean island, Little Saint James—where,
Virginia said, she'd been "sexually exploited by Epstein's adult male
peers, including royalty." Would Ghislaine please comment on this
assertion by
MS MAXWELL MET MS ROBERTS WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND WAS HIRED AS A MASSUSE. MS ROBERTS WAS
LIVING AT THE TIME WITH HER FIANCE. MS ROBERTS HAS A PRIOR SEXUAL HASSARASSMENT SUIT AGAINST OTHER
INDIVIDUALS THAT WAS THROWN OUT FOR LACK OF HER CREDABILITY AND DRUG USE. MS ROBERTS FINALLY FLED THE
US TO AVOID ARREST FOR THEFT. I THINK GIVEN THIS AND OTHER HIGHLY INDICATIVE EVENTS IN HER LIFE IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE ONE WORD OUT OF HER MOUTH. FURTHER THE INCENTIVE OF A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY
PAID BY A NEWSPAPER NO DOUBT ADDED TO HER COLOURFUL 'MEMORIES' WHICH IN FACT ARE NOTHING BUT MADE
UP STORIES.
4. The Mail on Sunday and other newspapers ran the story about
Andrew's rendezvous with in Ghislaine Maxwell's
London home. These reports said that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine
Maxwell left the Duke of York and alone for several
hours, and that the next morning Ghislaine Maxwell told
that the Duke had a good time. Would Ghislaine please comment
on this story. What did the Duke tell Ghislaine about his rendezvous
with
5. The Mail on Sunday said it had evidence to support
story—flight logs from Jeffrey Epstein's Boeing 727 and
Gulfstream jet. Was Ghislaine Maxwell on these airplanes and who else
was onboard?
AGAIN TO REMEMBER ANY SPECIFIC FLIGHT AND WHO WAS ON BOARD A PLANE FOR EVENTS THAT
ALEDEGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YEARS AGO IS SIMPLY UNREALISITC
6. According to a sworn deposition by Juan Alessi, a former employee
at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach estate, Prince Andrew attended naked
pool parties and was treated to massages by a harem of adolescent
girls.
MS MAXWELL CANNOT COMMENT ON WHAT MR ALESSI ALLEDEGDLY SAW OR DID NOT SEE BUT MS
MAXWELL NEVER SAW THE DUKE IN ANY STATE OF UNDRESS AND HE WAS INDEED ALWAYS PROPERLY ATTIRED.
That's it for now.
I hope that you can arrange for me to speak directly to Ghislaine.
All the best,
Ed
Edward Klein
1085 Park Avenue
5A
New York, NY 10128
Tel. 212.831.5110
3
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00086
EFTA01186659
Cell. 646.709.7293
[email protected] «mailto:[email protected]> mailto:[email protected]>
Ross Gow
Managing Partner
ACUITY Reputation
23 Berkeley Square
London W11 6HE
+44 (0) 203 008 7788
+44 (0) 777 875 5251
www.acuityreputation.com «http://www.acuityreputation.com> http://www.acuityreputation.com> <
<http://www.acuityreputation.com> http://www.acuityreputation.com>
End of Forwarded Message
4
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00087
EFTA01186660
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:38 AM
To: 'Gmax'
Subject: Re: Vanity Fair
--bcaec5186af405152304a535f62c
--bcaec5186af405152304a535f62c
--bcaec5186af405152304a535f62c--
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=13_3537537144_1463473083"
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not
> understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--6_3537537144_1463473083
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
no its ok „ but he will take out of context
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Gmax <[email protected]> wrote:
Do you have a problem with anything I said.
Original Message
From: jeffrey epstein <[email protected]>
To: Gmax
Sent: Wed Jun 0810:08:11 2011
Subject: Re: Vanity Fair
He wont ad details but you can try
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:52 PM, GMAX <[email protected]> wrote:
=20
=20
=20
On 6/8/119:49 AM, "1ler)" <[email protected]> wrote:
=20
=20
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00088
EFTA01186661
I would say a paid for story thar was nothing mote than a m= alicious fabrication =E2=80=930O YOU MEAN
INSTEAD OF ALL OF THIS JUST SAY THAT IT = WAS A FABRICATION..WHAT ABOUT SAYING THAT I MET HER WHEN SHE
WAS 17 AND LIVI= NG WITH HER FIANCE AND AVOID ALL THE OTHER STUFF
=20
Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone
=20
On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:42 PM, GMAX <[email protected]> wrote:
=20
=20
MY PROPOSED ANS IN CAPS..PLSE COMMENT
=20
Forwarded Message
From: Ross Gow <[email protected] «mailto= :[email protected]>
mailto:[email protected]»
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:49:02 -0400
To: G G <[email protected] «mailto:[email protected]=
m> mailto:[email protected]»
Cc: Brian Basham <[email protected] «mailto:ma= [email protected]>
mailto:[email protected]»
Subject: Vanity Fair
=20
Dear Ghislaine
=20
Klein's questions follow, below. If we are to respo= nd, I would advise
we stick to written responses rather than engage vi= a 'phone. Klein has
form for story-twisting re Hillary Clinton. Written= responses at least
give us an audit trail of what was said.
=20
A lot of this is Mail on Sunday rehash. Klein has o= ur statement, but
is offering the chance for further clarification...= I get the feeling
he's likely to make unflattering assumptions if we = don't give him on
the record answers.
=20
Please advise on those questions which you feel you= more comfortable
answering. We can head him off at the pass on those= and put legal
frighteners on him elsewhere.
=20
Just a caveat - we should be aware that there is a = chance that
anything other than fully robust answers might be c= onstrued as
inadvertent admissions of wrongdoing, so we will ne= ed legal team to
advise on precise wording. Do you want me to pass t= his on to
Devonshires if you have not already done so...?
best
Ross
=20
Dear Ross,
=20
Here are some fact-checking questions for Ghislaine= Maxwell to comment
on and answer:
=20
2
CONFIDENTIAL GM_00089
EFTA01186662
=20
1. Do Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell share a= home in London or
anywhere else? Do they still see each other? Does E= pstein help support
Ghislaine? Her friends tell me that Ghislaine once = loved Epstein. Does
she still love him?
=20
MS MAXWELL DOES NO SHARE ANY HOMES WITH MR EPSTEIN.= MR EPSTEIN DOES NOT SUPPORT MS
MAXWELL IN ANYWAY. MS MAXWELL HAD INFACT BEE= N IN COMMITTED RELATIONSHIP WITH SOMEONE ELSE FOR
THE PAST 7 YEARS
=20
2. The Mail on Sunday published a photograph showin= g the Duke of York
with his arm around Standing off= to one side in the
photo was Ghislaine Maxwell. The newspaper said tha= t this photo taken
in Ghislaine's London home. Was it? Did Jeffrey Ep= stein take the
photo? If not, who did?
=20
MS MAXWELL HAS NO RECOLECTION OF THE PHOTO BEING EV= EN TAKEN GIVEN WE ARE TALKING AN
EVENT THAT ALLEDGEDLY TOOK PLACE OVER 10 YE= ARS AGO IT WOULD BE SURPRISING
=20
3. According to Ghislaine Maxwell= recruited her as
Epstein=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Csex slave=E2=80=9D when she was 15 years o= Id and arranged for her
to see Andrew three times=E2=80=94at Jeffrey Epstein=E2=80=99s = homes in London and New
York and on his private Caribbean island, Little Sa= int James=E2=80=94where,
Virginia said, she=E2=80=99d been =E2=80=9Csexually exploited b= y Epstein=E2=80=99s adult male
peers, including royalty.=E2=80=9D Would Ghislaine please= comment on this
assertion by
=20
MS MAXWELL MET MS ROBERTS WHEN SHE WAS 17 AND WAS = HIRED AS A MASSUSE. MS ROBERTS WAS
LIVING AT THE TIME WITH HER FIANCE. MS RO= BERTS HAS A PRIOR SEXUAL HASSARASSMENT SUIT AGAINST OTHER
INDIVIDUALS THAT W= AS THROWN OUT FOR LACK OF HER CREDABILITY AND DRUG USE. MS ROBERTS FINALLY = FLED
THE US TO AVOID ARREST FOR THEFT. I THINK GIVEN THIS AND OTHER HIGHLY 1= NDICATIVE EVENTS IN HER LIFE IT IS
IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE ONE WORD OUT OF HER= MOUTH. FURTHER THE INCENTIVE OF A LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY
PAID BY A NEWSPAPE= R NO DOUBT ADDED TO HER COLOURFUL =E2=80=98MEMORIES=E2=80=99 WHICH IN FACT ARE
NOTHING B= UT MADE UP STORIES.
=20
4. The Mail on Sunday and other newspapers ran the = story about
Andrew=E2=80=99s rendezvous with in Ghis= laine Maxwell=E2=80=99s
London home. These reports said that Je rey Epstei= n and Ghislaine
Maxwell left the Duke of York and = alone for several
hours, and that the next morning Ghislaine Maxwell = told
that the Duke had a good time. Would Ghisla= ine ir llomment
on this story. What did the Duke tell Ghislaine abo= ut his rendezvous
with
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
9210c71379f74625d199ac9b18215662ac5c2ffbf3dbfcdc6cf091b017a28f95
Bates Number
EFTA01186642
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
51
Comments 0