EFTA00985979
EFTA00985981 DataSet-9
EFTA00985986

EFTA00985981.pdf

DataSet-9 5 pages 1,553 words document
P17 P19 P23 V16 P21
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (1,553 words)
From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com> To: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: IP Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:15:36 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif sorry, i fully understand , this is less about the house but more about the technicalites of the trust. if they say yes , we dont have to take it, if they say no it is helpful for noam. trust me On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Valeria Chomsky wrote: Dear Jeffrey, I don't want any of the money from the Trusts involved in our new house, not even to pay for the gardener. To purchase our new house with this money goes against all my principles. I don't want it and don't accept it. Actually don't accept this money for anything that involves me. I think if Noam thinks he is entitled to this money and wants to make use of it, he has to dedicate the money to things that only refers to him, such as paying for his subscriptions and business expenses that this year reached $ 130 thousand, but not for our common life or for any assets that we purchase together, as a couple. Especially now that I will be back to the work market. Jeffrey, there is something very serious going on with his children. I am being taken as someone who came to Noam's life to steal his money, as you probably have noticed. I lived to the age of 50 years old without Noam; having comfort first, through my family and later through my work. I had positions where I was respected, trusted and admired. For the first time in my life, I am being accused of very serious issues and in an inner circle that I should call "family". I don't have to accept this. I don't want to have anything to do with Noam's children. I married him, not them. They seem to believe that things have to be decided by a Committee. This is not a collective marriage. I am not interested in what Noam has given or decides to give to them, but also as spouses we have the right to live and decide our lives without their interference. That's why I want to have our finances completely separated from them. The same way we don't get involved in their lives, they don't have to get involved in ours. This is the goal. I think this suggestion of asking the money for the purchase of our new house, will put us again in the situation of dependency and will tie the house as an asset that was purchased with the money from their mother's trust (as they consider as being their mother's money) and with funds that the children are entitled to receive as the beneficiaries. Therefore the use of any money from the trust would raise questions that the house should come to them, since it was acquired with the money from their mother's trust. Anyone has the right, and it is not different for Noam, to leave a house for his second spouse, but not with the money from the Trusts in the name of Carol and that has their children as the beneficiaries. It would be morally wrong. But besides anyone's right to leave whatever to a second spouse, even more when Noam's spouse will be working in a formal job, besides working with him and contributing to the finances. I take solely responsibility to what is written above as my view of the facts. This doesn't mean that Noam has the same views, of course. Valeria Forwarded message From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation®gmail.com> Date: Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:48 AM EFTA00985981 Subject: Re: IP To: Valeria Chomsky I had a long call with debra. . (rich kahn ) , she had few answers, but realized there were many issues. she is way behind the curve, and asked for a meeting. to begin to get things in order. noam should request money from the trust. lets say the price of teh house in arizona Dear Max , I have purchased a residence for myself and valeria in arizona. . I would like a distribution from the trust to pay for it and its renovation. thank you for you consideration. On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Valeria Chomsky wrote: Forwarded message From: Deborah Pechet Quinan Date: Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:28 AM Subject: RE: IP To: Noam Chomsky Cc: Gene Landv Max Kohlenber "Valeria Chomsky ,Jayne Mahoney Dear Noam, Max and I spoke this morning, regarding your question below and regarding the trust accounts which you asked me about last week. Max indicated that the trust accounts are in the process of going through a final review and they should be ready to be sent to me and you shortly. Max, please let us know about when you expect to get these out to us. With respect to your inquiry below, Max indicates that he sent to my office all of the contracts that were in his possession. We compiled all of those contracts into binders for our files in May, and we would be happy to provide you with a complete set for your records. There are three large three-ring binders in a set, and I would be happy to arrange for them to be delivered to you. Please let me know when and where you would like these delivered. We will be creating a separate binder for all contracts we have copies of that were entered into after the original set of binders was compiled, and we will provide you with that new binder as well, to be updated as new contracts are entered into. With regard to the Gift Agreement with MIT, I have attached a copy for your records. Your gift to MIT constitutes a gift of physical materials and a license to copy, etc. for the copyright period, but does not constitute a gift of the copyrights themselves. If you have any questions about the agreement, or any other matters relating to your copyrights, please don't hesitate to contact Gene or me. All my best, Deborah EFTA00985982 Deborah Pechet Quinn, Esq. LL.M. Shareholder Chair, Trusts & Estates Group 255 State Street 7th Floor I Boston, MA 02109 Direct: Assistant - Jayne Mahoney: Office: I. Fax: e-mail: 1 www.riw.com 810 I Rhttp://www.riw.com/ riwemaillogosm.gif II From: Max Kohlenberg [mailto Sent: Monday, October 16, 201/ 1.2/ AM To: 'Noam Chomsky' Cc: Deborah Pechet Quinan Subject: RE: IP Good morning Noam — I will need to retrieve several of your files on this subject. (I believe some are in our offsite storage area.) I will reply to you first with whatever I have at hand and then supplement that with any offsite material that appears relevant. With best wishes, Max A. Max Kohlenberg Howland Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP One Financial Plaza —Suite 1600 Providence, Rhode Island 02903 Direct: Main EFTA00985983 Fax: www.hekblaw.com This email and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me by return email and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message or attachment. Thank you. From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 2:19 PM To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: IP Max, We're trying to work out arrangements about Intellectual Property and the archives. Met with the librarians, and they told us you should have the information. So could you please let me know what work has been done in the past on the IP, and what your understanding is with regard to the contract with MIT and its effect on IP rights? Thanks, Noam NOTICE: This email with its attachments, if any, is intended solely for permitted use by authorized recipients. If you are not an authorized recipient of this email, your retention, transmission, disclosure, or use of this email is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email and its attachments from your devices and systems. please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may EFTA00985984 constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00985985
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
9337afb4649fc52934d793d799a61d6809901c47abea0fa37eb42f2bd5d5e5a6
Bates Number
EFTA00985981
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
5

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!