EFTA01205143.pdf

From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com> To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 22:22:10 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif it is in exchange for a relase it is only valid if the release is signed On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Boris Nikolic wrote: OK Just a quick question — do I need something like that this promissory notes expires on May 15th or so. If they do not counter sign, there is a chance of dispute or default. I would rather have an expiration on it From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 2:52 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: Re: FW: the clawback is not davids problem., it is yours. gunderson has not moved your closer for 6 months now. , forget them and get it done On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Boris Nikolic c wrote: Please see a comment below. What do you think? Gunderson was always very worry about clawback issue B EFTA01205143 From: Steve R. Ray [mailto Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 11:49 AM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, I realize from your perspective that Jeffrey's approach is attractive as you don't have to come out of pocket for the $400k up front. I just want to make sure you understand the clawback exposure. David won't sign up for any clawback, which effectively leaves you on the hook. Depending on the performance of Blue Talon and Digisite in relation to the rest of the companies in the Fund, the exposure could be significant — well in excess of $400k. In addition, the proposed form of agreement is different from the draft we tendered and the signed copies that came back, so it will take additional time for them to digest. I just want you to understand the clawback exposure and relative trade-offs of using a different form of agreement before proceeding. Jeffrey and his attorney apparently do not understand the clawback as they haven't addressed it. It's worth mentioning that Peter called me Friday and advised that they fully expected you to counter-offer the signed copies they sent. They were just hoping to get the ball moving and want you to sign anything you propose. Signing and delivering Jeffrey's proposal would effectively do that. Thanks, Steve Steve R. Ray G9 GUNDERSON DETTMER Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian, LLP 1200 Seaport Boulevard Redwood City. CA 94063 Phone: This email and any attachments may contain private, confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately delete this email and any attachments. From: Boris Nikolic [mailto: Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 11:06 AM To: Steve R. Ray Subject: RE: EFTA01205144 Hi Steve, I am planning to sign this and send it today to Peter. Please can you just take a quick look. Currently I am offering 50% of the upside and 150K. This 150K (currently at Biosys bank account) together with 100K that they already cash out is 250K - enough for all cost and Boris Bentley Not sure if I need to place an expiration date (May 15111?) If I do not hear from you, I will assume it is all OK and sign it and send it to Peter. B From: Steve R. Ray [mailto: Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 10:03 PM To: Boris Nikolic Subject: RE: Hi Boris, David may find the proposal acceptable as, per the draft agreement, you would effectively be guaranteeing any clawback obligation that David might otherwise owe. The last time we considered this option, you were unwilling to guarantee the clawback and David was unwilling to assume the obligation. That's why we abandoned the carry approach. Steve EFTA01205145 Steve R. Ray GD GUNDERSON DETTMER Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian, LLP 1200 Seaport Boulevard Redwood City, CA94063 Phone: This email and any attachments may contain private, confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately delete this email and any attachments. From: Boris Nikolic [mailto: Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2015 9:46 PM To: Steve R. Ray Subject: FW: HI Steve Please find attached a document Jeffrey's attorney wrote. This is in line what Jeffrey discussed with Peter. It seems much easier structure (and better for me as it does not tie up my 400k) I would like to send it signed to David. I am thinking of lowering 250K to 150K. Please let me know Also — I talked to Peter earlier in day. He brought up Boris' Bentley and admitted that he is one that told it to Jeffrey. He however is telling that this was only a joke and that he made it up — that he did not hear it from David. I do not believe in this —that was a comment he was not allow to tell outside their circle. This just made me certain that this is my last offer to David. EFTA01205146  If they do not accept it, would like that going forward we cease any communication with them. Thank you Boris Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 17:50:15 -0400 Subject: From: [email protected] To: please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected]. and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of WE EFTA01205147  Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01205148