EFTA01387144.pdf

From: Vahe Stepanian Sent: 4/20/2018 2:16:02 PM To: Paul Barrett CC: Stewart Oldfield Martin Zeman Subject RE: RIN follow up No problem, happy to help. The team assumes a 50bps p.a. default rate, and I would point you to page 29 of the book to support this point. Also worth looking at the scenario analysis on pg. 40 — think scenarios 1-7 are particularly relevant because the 50bp issuance costs are in line with RIN I (vs. 2% for a BSL). Thank you, Vahe From: Paul Barrett [mailto Sent: Friday, April 20 2018 12:13 PM To: Vahe Stepanian Cc: Stewart Oldfield Martin Zeman Subject: RE: RIN follow up One more — what default/cumm loss assumptions are they using to get the expected return of 12-15%? Paul Barrett Alpha Group Capital LLC th th rk, NY 10019 ALPHA GROW) a CAPITAL From: Vahe Stepanian Sent: Thursday, A ril 19, 2018 5:53 PM To: Paul Barrett Cc: Stewart Oldfield Subject: RE: RIN follow up Paul- Apologies for the delayed response — had a bit of a crazy day here. Answers to your questions: Are the loans on completed infrastructure projects or more like construction loans? o The RIN team is focused on investing in loans secured by operational infrastructure projects. RIN II will have concentration limitations that require 85% of the portfolio to be comprised of loans secured by operating assets. For reference, there are 3 loans currently in RIN l's portfolio that are either (0 greenfield construction or (ii) have a large brownfield expansion underway and comprise -12% of RIN l's portfolio as of today. Although these loans have do have some construction risk, we believe that these risks have been well mitigated as described in the table below. Loan Nature of Construction Construction Risk Mitigants Cheniere Energy (SPLNG,CCTP) Assets includes operational pipeline, 4 • Lump-sum, fixed-price, CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0089270 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00235454 EFTA01387144