EFTA01300472.pdf
👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (156 words)
From: Jes Staley <
To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]>
Sent: 2/1/2010 6:45:57 AM
Subject:
Against the history of my 30 years with the bank, the current state of debate with
Washington, is actually not that bad.
The greatest problem with Glass Steagal, was that it separated Morgan from our clients as
our clients increasingly choose the capital markets over traditional bank products; they
selected MM funds over deposits and debt issues over bank loans. There is, thankfully, no
discussion in Washington of reinstating that wedge.
That said. We should accept a tight limit on private equity investing with bank capital.
Then we should reassert, and accept, the separation of bank capital with Fiduciary money.
We should fight to maintain our ability to service our clients as a fiduciary, irrespective
of how they choose to manage their money, so long as it is responsible.
My thoughts today.
Jes
SDNY_GM_00077569
Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-00000696
EFTA_00I 88039
EFTA01300472
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
96a96176af7b9ad5e2041dafdf81d6e0ff342f1b56d1f77ce5e49ec9365abcf8
Bates Number
EFTA01300472
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0