📄 Extracted Text (207 words)
From: Jeremy Rubin
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 4:58 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein; Joichi Ito; Bryan Bishop
Subject: CFTC to regulate bitcoin
Hi Jeffrey, Joi,
Bryan (CC'd) is doing som= work looking at how cftc is trying to regulate bitcoin options trading. S=e his note to me
below
"""so, cftc is making a decision by the end of the month about whether to regulate bitcoin for options trading- and we
need them to say yes... but they are presently confused about jamie dimon's comments saying bitcoi= is irrelevant, only
blockchain matters.
so to this end we are drafting an =pen letter that says why bitcoin matters and why database tech isn't t=e goal here and
i am passing around to core de=s
the draft letter: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GpcLG-9PrK8Z6ZPIOQ-
u1VDEIC1c=qlhOXvNiCmjHkDSg/edit#heading=h.m151wtu6dr44 <https://docs.google.com=document/d/1GpcIG-
9PrK8Z6ZPIOQ-u1VOBQc7qlhOXvNiCmjHkOSg/edit#heading=h.m=51wtu6dr44>
What do you think of the lett=r? Is Bryan right to ask for regulation? Are there advantages to trying to=stay
unregulated? Have you talked with Jamie about this stuff at all? (Bry=n, feel free to add more questions)
My hunch is that regulation is bad, but opti=n trading is good. Bitcoin accepting companies suffer because they can'=t
stomach the volatility without options. Are there orkarounds to get the =est of both?
Bes=,
Jer=my
--<=r>@JeremyRub=n <https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin> chttps://twitter.com/JeremyRubin>
EFTA_R1_01360669
EFTA02365389
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
96ddbc2df90dcafa54e39a12fa655c8cb2eb5ed91d06baf26345f2397109832b
Bates Number
EFTA02365389
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0