EFTA02532022.pdf

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, August 7, 2010 5:18 PM To: Ken-Hao Hsu Cc: Gary Kemey; Doug Schoettle; Warwick Wicksman; Tom Sze; Bryan Oakes Subject: Re: LSJ Update can we change , the height of the screening room, should be lowered or rais=d, to tweak the massing. On Thu, Aug 5, =010 at 8:25 PM, Ken-Hao Hsu > wrote: Team, To follow up Warwick's email, please see attached revised images for your reference. These images reflect smaller screening room. Thanks, Ken=Hao Hsu </=pan>LEED AP Associate 310.449.5778 Gensler </=pan> 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica CA 90404 </=pan> From:=span style="font-size: 10pt;"> Gary Kerney [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> I Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:30 PM To: Warwick Wicksman; Doug Schoettle Cc: Tom Sze; Bryan Oakes; Ken-Hao Hsu; Jeffrey Epstein Subject: RE: LSJ Update Warwi=k EFTA_R1_01675717 EFTA02532022  These look good,we'll understand all the stairs in the screen complex better when we see the 3D renderings, as well the scale of the screening room .when the renderings are ready send to all.=/span> Thanks Gary From: Warwick Wi=ksman Sent: Thu 8/5/2010 6:17 PM To: Gary Kerney; Doug Schoettle Cc: Tom Sze; Bryan Oakes; Ken-Hao Hsu Subject: LSJ Update Gary,=/span> Pleas= review these draft sketches, and let me know if you need me to add any more info before you present them to Mr. Epstein this weekend!=A0 I have not sent them to him yet. Ken-Hao will be sending you the 3D views later today — as soon as they are ready. I have attached the plan views only. With =hese sketches, we have exhausted the re-design services approved Work Authorization 1. These are intended to be programmatic conceptual drawings. When we move forward with the next phase, we will r=fine the layouts, and get into the details of the design. Pleas= note: •<=span> The layouts are based=upon previous Option 1, sent 7/28/10. •<=span> We have revised the e=terior stairs and circulation per our discussions. •<=span> We have provided opti=ns for the Kitchen windows. -<=span> We have revised the r=ad, to reflect the corrected site plan we received yesterday, 8/4/10, with the relocated service road. Note, this did impact the previous layout a bit. •<=span> I added the door at t=e north end of the east wall of the kitchen addition, per my conversation with Doug this morning. 2 EFTA_R1_01675718 EFTA02532023  The t=o "partial site plans" attached reflect the two different screening room sizes. One has a 30' screen, per our original design. The other has a 25' screen, as I discussed with Gary. I recommend someone mock up the two sizes for Mr. Epstein's review, perhaps in the living room, to confirm the desired screen size. The screening room area is not completely laid out, as we need to dig into =he design of that area in greater detail, once we set the location and screen size. If th=s layout is approved, we can prepare a new proposal to provide complete construction documents, based on this layout, including al= of our consultants. If we need to make minor adjustments, we can accommodat= that as we move forward. If we need to make major adjustments, I can prepare a new proposal for additional conceptual re-design services.=/p> Pleas= call me or email me if you have any questions! Thank=, Warwi=k =A0 Warwick Wicksm=n, AIA =A0 2500 Broadway Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90404 USA =*** ******* *** ********* *** ***** ***** The information contained in this c=mmunication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the a=dressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, di=closure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictl= prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, p=ease notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy thi= communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. 3 EFTA_R1_01675719 EFTA02532024