podesta-emails

podesta_email_00597.txt

podesta-emails 5,903 words email
P18 P22 P19 V11 V16
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *Main Topics:* McCain's 2013 Speech, Bush's Remarks Before the Knesset, The Republican Brand* Summary of Shift:* Bush's speech before the Knesset was a major subject today. His remarks on appeasement elicited responses from Obama, Clinton and McCain. McCain's speech in Ohio envisioning a world at the end of his first term took up the remainder of the media's time drawing commentary from all sides. Disasters, natural and manmade, received residual attention. Highlights 1. McCain's vision for the future a. McCain's speech contains Bush-like optimism b. Olbermann looks at McCain's speech point-by-point c. Cafferty refers to McCain's proposals as "political crap," suggests they're rosy but light on details d. McCain denies that he's proposing a timeline e. Speech perhaps an attempt for McCain to minimize the age issue 2. Bush's Knesset appeasement remarks a. Biden counters Bush and McCain's appeasement attacks b. Charlie Black discusses Bush-Obama "appeasement" flap c. Bush doesn't leave politics at the water's edge d. Zakaria suggests "bellicose" McCain is the same as--if not worse than--Bush today and in their foreign policy e. Hume: McCain echoed Bush in swipe at Obama 3. The Republican Brand a. Republicans on the whole not distancing themselves from Bush b. McCain should try to separate himself from the brand, not save it c. Resentment of George Bush bleeds over to McCain d. McCain finds himself closer to Bush as he pursues the McDifferent line e. McCain's attempts to distance himself from Bush are more stylistic than substantive 4. McCain and Bush raise Obama concerns among Jewish voters 5. McCain's age more of a problem with older voters 6. *Newsweek* runs into trouble for non-pro-McCain articles 7. Hagee apologizes but remarks remain offensive Clips* Highlight #1* *CNN Panel Reacts to McCain's Speech, Discuss Timetables, Bush-like Optimism * (CNN 05/15/08 8:24pm) CAMPBELL BROWN: […] McCain has been adamant that there would be no timelines for getting out of Iraq. But today it basically sounded like troops are out by 2013. […] How can that not be a timetable? TARA WILLIAMS: […] Well it's not a timetable. You could argue that it is a timetable, but that's—I think, he's not putting it down on paper, he's saying this is a vision of what I see could happen. Look at the tone of his speech. […] There are a lot of lofty things there that we'd all like to see. I think it's trying to lift our spirits right now. We're in a down period right now, lot of frustration. *He's trying to lift the spirit of Americans, the same way George Bush did when he first came into office, inherited a recession, 9/11, corporate scandals. And say, listen, we can get through this, we're gonna push ahead*. And the only thing about whether this will come back to haunt him is that he hasn't locked down anything concrete, […] he hasn't said anything tangible. It's a rosy picture of where we'd like to be. […] MICHAEL CROWLEY: It's a well-worn theory of American politics that optimism sells, optimism works. […] And look, what other choice does McCain have? He can't promise to continue Bush's policies, so he's gotta make an omelet out of broken eggs and say look things are so bad I'm gonna get us back to the way things were before they were that bad. […] When you look especially at the domestic agenda, it really does seem like a fantasy because McCain is not going to have a Republican Congress. […] ED SCHULTZ: Can I play the violin music with John McCain on this? The country's not with McCain on Iraq! He's got an image problem. He's a warmonger […] And now he's trying to reinvent himself like hey! We're actually gonna have a timetable, and 2013 is what we're looking at. The fact is, this is the same guy that has called Democrats on the carpet for possible surrender, for cut-and-run, for appeasement—he's gone right down the list. The problem is you can't trust John McCain. The American people aren't thinking about 2013, they're thinking about 2009. Theyr'e thinking about $12billion a month and the loss of life, and he has no end in sight, he has no plan in sight. It's just a dart board, it's a guessing game. […] It's a sad foreign policy. It's more Bush. BROWN: […] More generally, I mean, *the speech was all rhetoric. It's not like he talked in any detail about how he'd do any of this. And he's always criticizing Obama for doing nothing but providing rhetoric.* […] SCHULTZ: Then why don't you get us out of it?! *McCain offers no exit strategy whatsoever to get us out of it. That's the bottom line. It's more Bush. It's more of the same. There's no getting out of Iraq with John McCain. You can't trust him on it. He is a warmonger!* *McCain's 2013 Speech Point-By-Point *(MSNBC 05/15/08 8:50pm) KEITH OLBERMANN: There will still have been no terrorist attacks since 9/11. The war in Iraq is won. Osama bin Laden is dead, or in custody. The world food crisis is over. The economy is growing robustly. Kids are smarter, and thinner. All over, America's problems are already solved or being solved . . . Sen. McCain's vision of Bush's third term. I'm sorry, of his first term . . . JOHN MCCAIN: It's important that the candidates who seek to lead the country after the Bush administration to find their objectives and what they plan to do and what they plan to achieve. Not with vague language but with clarity. OLBERMANN: What followed from Sen. Dole, I'm sorry, Sen. McCain was a twenty minute wish-list for the next four years with absolutely no specifics on just how he might achieve any of it. [. . .] OLBERMANN: Maintaining a military presence in Iraq. Meaning permanent bases, so we could stay there for a hundred years after he spent so much time insisting that that was not his plan? [. . .] OLBERMANN: As to the economy: JOHN MCCAIN: The alternate minimum tax is being phased out with relief provided first to middle-income families. OLBERMANN: That would be the same alternate minimum tax proposal phase out that *Newsweek* points out would cost as much as $1.6 trillion dollars in ten years. And those middle class families? To McCain that means people earning more than $200,000 a year. [. . .] JOHN MCCAIN: . . . congress has not sent me an appropriations bill containing earmarks for the last three years. OLBERMANN: Those would be the same earmarks that paid for the Jersey City Liberty Science Center in New Jersey, the Ferry in Gee's Bend, Alabama and the Naval Air Station Cecil Field in Jacksonville, Florida all stops on Sen. McCain's current campaign swing. [. . .] JOHN MCCAIN: Healthcare has become more accessible to more Americans than at any time in history. . . OLBERMANN: Of course the McCain healthcare plan takes away the tax break given to those who buy insurance from their employer meaning the number of Americans who might be forced to find new insurance will be 158 million. And in pushing people towards individual insurance he leaves the 56 million people who have chronic conditions, like his own, vulnerable to the whims of the insurance companies. *In Speech Laying Out Vision for His First Term, McCain Sounds Like McSame, Lacks Details* (CNN 05/15/08 6:16PM) WOLF BLITZER: If you listen to his speech, if you read his speech, Jack, he paints a very beautiful picture in the year 2013. JACK CAFFERTY: *All we have to do is follow the Yellow Brick Road, right?*And we'll get to some pla— You know, I hope he can do it. That'd be great. I'd love to see Osama bin Laden dead and democracy in Iraq and all the troops home and the rest of the things he talked about. *The devil, of course, is in the details. *And he didn'texpel out exactly how we're going to do that. An earlier piece on this show said that there's been no actionable intelligence on the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden since Tora Bora, which was a number of years ago. But I wish him well. […] JEFFREY TOOBIN: I think it's an honorable way to run for President. […] *I think the Iraq stuff is very difficult because if you listen to what he said, it sounded almost exactly what George Bush has—like what George Bush said 2 years ago, 3 years ago, 5 years ago; and we appear to be no closer to that goal*. So it will remind people of how the promises about Iraq have not been fulfilled. But I think McCain does deserve credit for putting himself out on the line. CAFFERTY: […] Political promises are a dime a dozen. […] The public's up to their eyeballs in broken promises. *This garbage about Iraq is the same bill of goods that we've been sold by the Bush administration since we invaded that country*: 'we'll be greeted as liberators,' 'we'll set up a functioning democracy, all good will come to the Middle East, they'll pay for the war with their oil. It's garbage! It hasn't happened, it ain't gonna happen. The tribal animosities that fuel the violence in that part of the world date back centuries! They are not gonna adopt a Western-style democracy next year or in 2013 or 100 years from now. *So you know, it's just more political crap!* *Cameron Reports: McCain Denies That He's Proposing a Timetable; Shows Temper, Frustration with Press* (FNC 05/15/08 6:09pm) CARL CAMERON: On his campaign bus, McCain repeatedly denied that predicting that most troops will have been welcomed home and the Iraq War will have been won amounts to a timetable. [begin video clip] JOHN MCCAIN: I'm not putting a date on it. [end clip] CAMERON: After reporters asked him basically the same question 11 times, McCain grew impatient. [begin video clip] JOHN MCCAIN: I'll try to repeat again exactly what I just said. And I will repeat it over and over again. I'll be glad to do that for you there. I believe that the surge is succeeding. I believe that victory is coming about. [end video clip] CAMERON: Behind the scenes, the McCain campaign is becoming increasingly frustrated with mainstream media coverage. For years, McCain's criticism of Republicans—and willingness to talk about it with reporters a lot—made him something of a media darling. But now that he's criticizing Democrats and principally Barack Obama, the tone has changed dramatically, and Mr. Straight Talk is no longer finding the press as friendly nor willing to cut him the slack it once was. *Krauthammer Suggests Speech Was Attempt to Minimize Age Issue for McCain*(FNC 05/15/08 6:53pm) CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Look this speech, which was a great speech, is not about Iraq. It's not about education. It's not about health care. All of which he summarized well. It's about the age issue. What he did is he frames it in a way—he speaks about the year 2013. He knows that Americans remember that Reagan in the second term in the end looked weak—and afterwards he developed Alzheimers—and McCain […] doesn't want Americans thinking of him at 80. He wants Americans thinking of him in the first term: he's strong, vigorous, active right now, and plausibly will be for the next 4 years. So he frames all of this within the 4 years. He doesn't announce he's only going to have one term—that would be a disaster, he'd be a lame duck. But he's implying in that speech—you've got all kinds of hints in that speech about not worring about reelection. On the day I'm sworn in until the day I leave office, I want to accomplish all this. He's talking about a frame of time, which is a way to blunt the age issue, which is a serious issue. It can't be eliminated, but I think this is a way to at least minimize it. *Highlight #2* *Biden and Matthews Deflate McCain and Bush's Double-Team of Barack *(MSNBC 5/15/08 5:10pm) CHRIS MATTHEWS: [John McCain] responds to what President Bush said, it sounds like they're doing an alley-oop play . . . they're working together because here's Sen. McCain basically underlining the shot against Barack. JOHN MCCAIN: He does bring up an issue we'll be discussing with the American people. And that is, why does Barack Obama . . . want to sit down with a state sponsor of terrorism? What does he want to talk about with Ahmadinejad who said that Israel is a skinking corpse, who said that he wants to wipe Israel off the map, who's sending the most explosive devices into Iraq, killing Americans? What does he want to talk about with him? MATTHEWS: Well it seems like it's alley-oop play in the NBA, Senator, the president threw the ball up near the basket and John McCain put it in . . . JOE BIDEN: I'll tell you what he wants to talk about. He wants to talk about the same thing Secretary of Defense Gates wants to talk about. He wants to talk about the same thing that Condi Rice wants to talk about. Both of whom are saying we should be talking. . . and since when does a president or John McCain think that "no" does not exist in the vocabulary of an American president. Talking doesn't mean you agree. Why would you talk? You would talk to enhance America's interest and change behavior. . . the same reason why the President of the United States is . . . talking with . . . Kim Jong-Il, the same reason he corresponded with . . . Qaddaffi who we labeled a terrorist in a terrorist state. Why? To stop their conduct. I find this so disappointing . . . MATTHEWS: It seems to me that a couple of times in history we failed to talk to our enemies and we caused ourselves big trouble. We didn't talk to the head of North Korea when Atchinson suggested that the line of defense didn't include North and South Korea. We did make a mistake when April Glasby talked to Saddam Hussein and didn't tell him we'd fight for Kuwait. It seems to me that there examples in the past of when you oughta talk to the bad guys and tell them where the line is drawn. JOE BIDEN: There's a great quote from . . . President John Kennedy . . . he said, "We should never negotiate out of fear but we should never fear to negotiate." . . . tell me how as President of the United States you say we should be in full-blown direct discussions with North Korea, a proliferator of nuclear technology . . . , who have missile technology and nuclear capability, how can we talk with them and negotiate with them and say it is appeasement to even attempt to broach a discussion with the Iranians . . . *Charlie Black Discusses Bush-Obama 'Appeasement' Flap, McCain's "Optimistic" Vision for America* (FNC 05/15/08 5:11pm) BILL HEMMER: […] Here's the Obama response to McCain backing up George Bush from earlier today: […] "It is the height of hypocrisy for John McCain to deliver a lofty speech about civility and bipartisanship in the morning and then embrace George Bush's disgraceful political attack in the afternoon." Your chance to react to that now, Charlie. CHARLIE BLACK: Well you know the Obama campaign is in a bad way today. The President made a speech, he didn't say anything about Barack Obama. But if the shoe fits, wear it. *They obviously reacted and said the shoe fit them and got into a fight with the President. Now of course the President is right. And of course Senator McCain is right* that when Senator Obama said that he would meet with Ahmadinejad without pre-conditions, head-of-state to head-of-state, that that was naive and inexperienced and showed a lack of judgment about foreign policy. Ms. Rice was just trying to change their position and say there would be conditions and other preparations made, but that's not what the candidate said and it's not what's on their website. And it just shows their lack of judgment and experience, and the more he wants to talk about it the better. HEMMER: […] Sen McCain had a 30-minute speech in Columbus, Ohio. Lays out his vision of what the world would like like after four years in the white house. Watch here on Iraq, first. [clip of McCain] HEMMER: So that's a big list […] Is that a platform or is that what Democrats call a wish list? BLACK: Well, here's what it is. Senator McCain believes that candidates for president should present their vision of the future and then lay out specific policies of how they would achieve that vision. Senator McCain has been laying out detail-specific policies for a year and a half: national security, foreign policy, economic policy, health care. What he did today is to say: here is my vision, the policies I have outlined if I get cooperation from congress and we can work in a bipartisan fashion, this will be the result. this is what America will look like after four years of my presidency. i think it's exactly the kind of optimistic vision that the American people are looking for. HEMMER: You know, when a candidate lays out a speech like this, you hope to get a lot of air time and a lot of headlines. did the news out of Jerusalem and what happened within the Democratic Party and Barack Obama knock some of these headlines off the front pages today, Charlie? BLACK: Well, I don't think so. Fox and a couple of your competitors covered the entire speech live this morning, so we're happy about that. And we're still talking about it. But this vision speech by john McCain will have lasting effect. Americans will be reading it, thinking about it. They will understand where he wants to take the country, the hopeful optimistic vision that he can achieve and they will be comparing it to Senator Obama or Senator Clinton who only think things are bad and getting worse and are offering a very cynical pessimistic view of the future. We're optimistic and hopeful. *Bush Doesn't Leave Politics at the Water's Edge *(MSNBC 05/15/08 8:30pm) KEITH OLBERMANN: He'll take Bush at his word that he did not mean Sen. Obama. That does not mean however that he himself will not attack Sen. Obama in the exact same way, raising him a Neville Chamberlin. JOHN MCCAIN: I will debate this issue with Sen. Obama throughout this campaign. I believe in peace through strength. And, peace through strength is the way that we have succeeded in the past. And yes there have been appeasers in the past and the President is exactly right. One of them was named Neville Chamberlin. OLBERMANN: Neville Chamberlin, who, like Sen. McCain was a conservative . . . what happened to the leave your differences at the border US policy that they threw down on President Carter like a ton of bricks when he went abroad and criticized the government. Why does Bush get to get away with blatant partisanship, and historical revisionism by the way, and, I don't know, get allowed back in the country? DANA MILBANK: I suspect that the Justice Department has drafted some opinion saying that just as the president is exempt from the Geneva Accords, he is exempt from the politics at the water's edge thing. *Zakaria Suggests "Bellicose" McCain is "Doubling Down on Every Bad Bed that George Bush Has Made" *(CNN 5/15/08 5:41pm) WOLF BLITZER: Here's how John McCain reacted today to what the President said in Jerusalem. [Rolls video clip of McCain on the bus] He was—he minced no words at all. What do you think about that? FAREED ZAKARIA: […] It is again ahistorical. […] Most recently, let's remember that Gen David Petraeus has talked to the Sunni insurgents and terrorists who were killing Americans only months earlier. And that a large part of the success of the surge has been the willingness of Petraeus and the American military to talk to the people who they once called terrorists and insurgents. ZAKARIA: McCain gave a speech in which he said that the United States should mount a campaign to kick Russia out of the G8, to then expand the G8 […] to include Brazil and India but not China. And it struck me that this policy of effectively drawing a line and creating a kind of new Cold War—between the United States on one hand and China and Russia—was really unprecedented. No had ever proposed something like this before. […] BLITZER: So it would be a resumption of the Cold War, that's what you're saying? ZAKARIA: *It would be a resumption of the Cold War, except this time with the economy that's going 3 times as fast as the United States- in China's case. *And in Russia's case, with one of the largest oil producers in the world. […] BLITZER: It sounds like you believe McCain doesn't have—isn't on board this vision that you have. But the Democratic candidates[…]—do they understand what's going on? ZAKARIA: Obama seems to understand what's going on. *[…] McCain, I fear, while a very intelligent man who I have a lot of respect for, has kind of reverted to a very bellicose foreign policy that seems to be doubling down on every bad bet that George Bush has made.* *Hume: McCain Echoed Bush in Swipe at Obama* (FNC 05/15/08 5:04pm) BRIT HUME: […] John McCain obviously thought this was a good fight for his side to have, which is why he, after days of trying to distance himself from President Bush on a number of issues, jumped in essentially on the same side as President Bush today. *Highlight #3* *Republicans on the Whole not Distancing Themselves from Bush* (MSNBC 05/15/08 8:41pm) KEITH OLBERMANN: Ok, to the point of McCain . . . Sen. McCain would presumably be unhappy that he was bigfooted here by President Bush on this of all topics, then why, you know, sort of, throw your chips in with him, calling Obama an appeaser and now eliminating any chance that this is not about Obama by throwing in Neville Freakin' Chamberlin . . . McCain might've been better served by saying, "I don't know who George Bush is," wouldn't he? RACHAEL MADDOW: I think though that the Republicans surprise us over and over again by the degree that they do not distance themselves from George W. Bush. It's kind of the constant political common wisdom and it has been since George Bush's approval ratings went south a very long time ago. That kind of for other Republicans to succeed they really need to divorce themselves from George W. Bush and run as an anti-George Bush Republican. We haven't seen any successful Republican effort to do that. Everybody keeps saying that they will start doing that but we're only seeing John McCain do that on things that are essentially style points. Saying, I promise that I'll have lots of press conferences, I promise I will admit my mistakes, I promise that you can buy eco-friendly t-shirts from my website. It's style points. They stick together on the big issues. None of them have yet thrown Bush under the bus. *The Struggling Republican Brand *(MSNBC 05/14/08 5:38pm) DAVID SHUSTER: Today in Columbus Ohio John McCain delivered his latest effort to rebrand the Republican party and create separation from President Bush. First, McCain vowed to end the Iraq war in under five years. Under his vision: JOHN MCCAIN: By January 2013, Americans welcome home most of the servicemen and women. The United States maintains a military presence in there, but a much smaller one and it does not play a direct combat role. SHUSTER: Gone, of course, was any talk of a hundred year commitment. Second, McCain promised to change the Republican White House governing style. MCCAIN: I will ask Democrats to serve in my administration. My administration will set a new standard for transparency and accountability. I will hold weekly press conferences. SHUSTER: McCain even pledged to let members of congress question him the same way the British House of Commons does with Great Britain's Prime Minister. [. . .] MCCAIN: When we make errors, I'll confess them readily and explain what we intend to do to correct them. SHUSTER: McCain's efforts to change perceptions about Republican leadership and acknowledge public concerns about the duration of the Iraq War come at a crucial time. Thanks largely to voter frustrations over Iraq, fears about the sputtering US economy and anger over high gas prices. President Bush's disapproval rating has reached 71%. That's the highest disapproval rating of any president in modern history. Higher even than Richard Nixon. And Republicans in congress are getting crushed. Tuesday night marked the third straight special election where a strong Republican district was won by a Democrat. [. . .] SHUSTER: McCain may find it easier to separate from the Republican brand than to save it. Still, efforts like today bring their own problems. McCain's pledged to get out of Iraq by 2013 is the kind of declaration that he used to attack, raising new questions and putting McCain on the defensive. REPORTER: You're not setting a date but, you're predicting it'll be by 2013. MCCAIN: H-,h-,how many times can I say— REPORTER: There was a specific date in the speech you just gave. MCCAIN: I said by the end of my first term. SHUSTER: Democrats charge that McCain is now engaged in the same kind of word games as President Bush. It's a reminder that for all the Republican efforts to create a new image, Democrats are just as focused on trying to make sure that the current image of a GOP marching in lock-step with President Bush stays the same . . . *McCain needs to Distance Himself not only from Bush but the Republican Brand Also *(MSNBC 05/15/08 5:41pm) CHRIS MATTHEWS: Bob [Herberts], it seems to me that he was cauterizing the wound there. Hundred year war? No. We'll end in 2013. Very clearly a mathematical correction to a mathematical problem. BOB HERBERTS: I'm getting hints here of a little bit of triangulation going on with McCain, jumping on some of these Democratic issues, maybe looking for an end game in terms of the war. He's out there talking about global warming. He went down south and kicked off a little bit of a poverty tour. It's very interesting, the way he's running. And probably smart. [. . .] TUCKER CARLSON: Nixon '68. Peace with honor. Of course. He's the one guy who can do it. Look, no one's going to question his patriotism, of course. No one's going to question his knowledge of military matters. No one's going to question his commitment to winning the Iraq war. He's the perfect vessel for this message . . . which is, "Only I can do it in a way which makes you proud of America." . . . MATTHEWS: Well, is he going to be like Nixon going to China, DeGaulle ending up the war in Algeria, is that what he's offering? A dramatic shift? Or is he offering a pretense of that? Is he going to change Bush policy or not? CARLSON: He's offering what Nixon offered in 1968 . . . the implied message was, "You know the war's not going well but you're not with the long haired freaks who want to embarrass America." MATTHEWS: Nixon was very smart, he said we need new leadership . . . let me ask you about this rebrand . . . HERBERTS: . . . when I was out in Pennsylvania for the primary, I was really surprised, I was talking about Hillary vs. Obama and talking to these blue collar workers . . . and spontaneously, this vehement hostility to George Bush would enter the conversation . . . and what I thought was especially interesting . . .is that that was bleeding over into McCain and so many of them said that McCain would just continue Bush's policies. That's just a knee-jerk feeling that they have and that can't be a good thing. MATTHEWS: The fact that the President jumped in, apparently on his side today, with regard to appeasement and dealing with Ahmadinejad. I mean you don't want to be the Doublemint Twins if you're McCain, do you? With President Bush? CARLSON: No. It was actually McCain I believe jumped in and second President Bush. MATTHEWS: Yeah, he joined him. CARSLON: Right. He compared any effort to talk to our enemies abroad to Chamberlin's efforts to appease Hitler or whatever. Invoking the dread Hitler analogy which is never appropriate in any circumstance in my view. *As McCain Persues McDifferent he Finds Himself Closer to Bush* (MSNBC 05/15/08 5:55pm) CHRIS MATTHEWS: . . . You know, this seems to be working at cross purposes, the Republicans are generally more organized than the Democrats but today you have John McCain trying to separate himself from the very unpleas-, unpopular war in Iraq by saying he'll get us out of there by 2013 in large part. Obviously trying to get rid of that 100-years comment he made a while ago. And at the same time he jumps in and supports President Bush's attack on Barack Obama, sort of creating a Doublemint twin situation on the Republican side. *How Can McCain Distance Himself from Bush?* (MSNBC 05/15/08 6:45pm) DAVID GREGORY: You can tell from McCain's language who he's talking about when he says he will admit to mistakes readily. RICHARD WOLFE: Yeah, look, he's obviously got a personal contrast with President Bush and a tone of speaking which is different that President Bush's. But if he really does want to go after the national security agenda as opposed to the economic one, then he's going to have to stress something different. Not going after Iran, do the warmongering thing, say he's tougher than Obama on Iran. He's actually got to talk about diplomacy in a way that Bush never did. If he can tie that to one of his core messages, which is about national service . . . then he has an agenda on foreign policy which would sound and look different than President Bush's. GREGORY: . . . if he can combine stalwart support, even for the war in Iraq . . . and couple that with the morality stances he took on issues like torture, that could be a winning combination. RACHAEL MADDOW: Except he lost . . . the torture argument when he voted for the CIA being allowed to continue to use those other tactics recently . . . I tend to agree with Richard on this, I think, but slightly from a different angle. I think that McCain will not really divorce himself from Bush on substantive issues. He'll try to make the distinction on style points essentially . . . *Highlight #4* *McCain/Bush Together Raise Concerns about Obama Among Jewish Voters* (CNN 05/15/08 ED HENRY: […] The President's broadside before the Israeli Knesset, in which he stressed his Administration's close ties to Israel could raise more concerns about Obama with Jewish-American voters, especially since the President also used a reference to the Holocaust to suggest some people do not understand the grave threat posed by Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah […] Senator McCain already stoked those concerns among Jewish-American voters by charging that Obama is the favorite candidate of Hamas. *Highlight #5* *Older People less Comfortable with McCain's Age* (MSNBC 05/15/08 5:43pm) BOB HERBERTS: . . . but let me also agree with Tucker on the age issue . . . when I was out in Pennsylvania that was another thing that came up spontaneously, I wasn't interested in it, I was not asking about it. And people would just say again and again, "I think the guy's too old" or "my mother-in-law thinks the guy's too old." CHRIS MATTHEWS: How old were they? HERBERTS: They were middle aged, family people, I'd say they were in there 40s or 50s, most of them. [. . .] TUCKER CARLSON: . . . we know that from polling already . . . you look at the numbers on this, people over 65 . . . the numbers show, old people don't want an old president. *Highlight #6* *Straight Talk Express Unaccepting of Criticism* (MSNBC 05/15/08 8:48) KEITH OLBERMANN: . . . Mark Salter, emerging as the chief media manipulator of John McCain's campaign. First he was critical of *Newsweek's* coverage. It was not pro-McCain, thus, in his opinion, it must have been pro-Obama. Now, *The Wall Street Journal* reports, Salter quote, "threatened to throw the campaign reporters off the campaign bus and airplane according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. Salter says he expressed the campaign's displeasure and is talking to the publication about future access." Your Straight Talk Express in action, surpressing freedom of the press. *Highlight #7* *Hagee Apologiezes but his Comments Remain Offensive *(CNN 05/15/08 5:32pm) WOLF BLITZER: Candidates hope endorsements will bring them votes but for John McCain, one endorsement has brought a lot of headaches . . . that would be the endorsement of the evangelist Pastor John Hagee. Mary Snow is looking into the story . . . MARY SNOW: Well Wolf, John Hagee is here in New York and this afternoon he held a private meeting. . . in his latest effort to make peace with catholics. JOHN MCCAIN: I'm very honored by Pastor John Hagee's endorsement . . . SNOW: . . . Hagee met today with one of his most vocal Catholic critics . . . the Catholic league blasted Hagee and put pressure on McCain after the endorsement. The Catholic League's president called a truce after Hagee wrote a letter that said, quote, "express my deep regret for any comments that Catholics have found hurtful." . . . BILL DONAHUE: Yes, I absolutely accept his apology . . . SNOW: Sen. McCain called the apology laudable. [. . .] SNOW: Another Catholic group says it welcomes Hagee's apology but: JAMES SALT: The problem is that there has been a longstanding pattern of offensive and problematic rhetoric from John Hagee. SNOW: Like suggesting Hurricane Katrina was punishment from god because of a gay pride parade. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the "big campaign" group. To post to this group, send to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] E-mail [email protected] with questions or concerns This is a list of individuals. It is not affiliated with any group or organization. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
👁 1 💬 0
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
983760f6d7ae0cb8a974d8108f53fe49e69313d78a29a534c9fd7a29b017f100
Dataset
podesta-emails
Document Type
email

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!