👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (750 words)
our farms or that farms that we acquire in the future will not be subject to third•party mineral rights.
lb the extent that third parties have mineral rights on farms that we currently own or acquire in the
future, we expect that we would be required to permit third parties to enter such farms for the purpose
of drilling and operating oil or gas wells on the premises. We will also be required to set aside a
reasonable portion of the surface area of our farms to accommodate these oil and gas operations. The
devotion of a portion of our farms to these oil and gas operations would reduce the amount of the
surface available for farming or farm-related uses. Such activities might also disrupt the productivity of
the farmland or property related to farming or increase the risk of environmental liabilities, any of
which could materially adversely impact the rents that we receive from leasing these farms.
If our tenants fail to comply with applicable labor regulations, it could have an adverse effect on our tenants'
ability to make rental payments to us and, in turn, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
State, county and federal governments have implemented a number of regulations governing labor
practices used in connection with farming operations. For example, these regulations seek to provide
for minimum wages and minimum and maximum work hours, as well as to restrict the hiring of illegal
immigrants. If one of our tenants is accused of violating, or found to have violated such regulations, it
could have a material adverse effect on the tenant's results of operations, which could materially
adversely affect its ability to make its rental payments to us and, in turn, our ability to make
distributions to our stockholders.
New legislation or regulations reeding the U.S. agricultural sector, particularly with respect to miter use in
California, could materially adversely affect the value of our farms and results of operations.
If Congress implements new legislation or regulations affecting the U.S. agricultural sector, these
changes could materially adversely affect the value of our farms and results of operations by requiring
the reformulation of our business to meet new standards, including environmental standards. In the
first quarter of 2014, The Agricultural Act of 2014, or the Act, was signed into U.S. law. It enacts a
series of changes with respect to farmland, including, hut not limited to, repealing direct payments and
enhancing crop insurance. Given its recent passage, we cannot determine what prospective effect, if
any, the Act will on U.S. farmland generally, and our business specifically. In addition, in 2014,
California passed the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014 ("SGMA') which, among
other objectives, seeks to achieve a sustainable balance in identified aquifers throughout California. The
SOMA authorizes local and regional agencies to form groundwater sustainability agencies that will
prepare and submit a groundwater sustainability plan ("GSP") to the California Department of Water
Resources by either 2020 or 2022 (depending upon priority rating of the basin), with the intention of
achieving groundwater sustainability within 20 years. The implementation of the GSI's, while not yet
defined, may have an impact on the water availability for our farms and therefore impact crop
production, which may adversely affect our revenues or land valuations; however, the details of such
water management decisions will take time to finalize and implementation will vary by water district.
Moreover, legislation or regulation implemented in the U.S. or elsewhere in the world relating to
genetically modified crops could negatively impact the price of impacted crops, which could impact the
lease rates we can charge for our farms, thereby hurting our financial performance.
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
Our charter contains certain restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock that may delay, defer or
prevent a change of control or other transaction that might involve a premium price for our shares of
common stock or that our stockholders otherwise believe to be in their best interests.
In order to qualify as a REIT, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding stock may be
owned, directly or indirectly, by or for five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include
certain entities such as private foundations) at any time during the last half of any taxable year
(beginning with our second taxable year as a REIT). In order to help us qualify as a REIT, our charter
43
CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R CRIM P 6(e) DB-SDNY-0085606
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00231790
EFTA01384946
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
9b5d446949ac6137d3d2447c441bca8ff46ff97b7080348056392a06f58b08f6
Bates Number
EFTA01384946
Dataset
DataSet-10
Type
document
Pages
1
💬 Comments 0