podesta_email_01693.txt

podesta-emails 7,014 words email

V11 P19 V16 V15 D6

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQQBBGBjDtIBH6DJa80zDBgR+VqlYGaXu5bEJg9HEgAtJeCLuThdhXfl5Zs32RyB I1QjIlttvngepHQozmglBDmi2FZ4S+wWhZv10bZCoyXPIPwwq6TylwPv8+buxuff B6tYil3VAB9XKGPyPjKrlXn1fz76VMpuTOs7OGYR8xDidw9EHfBvmb+sQyrU1FOW aPHxba5lK6hAo/KYFpTnimsmsz0Cvo1sZAV/EFIkfagiGTL2J/NhINfGPScpj8LB bYelVN/NU4c6Ws1ivWbfcGvqU4lymoJgJo/l9HiV6X2bdVyuB24O3xeyhTnD7laf epykwxODVfAt4qLC3J478MSSmTXS8zMumaQMNR1tUUYtHCJC0xAKbsFukzbfoRDv m2zFCCVxeYHvByxstuzg0SurlPyuiFiy2cENek5+W8Sjt95nEiQ4suBldswpz1Kv n71t7vd7zst49xxExB+tD+vmY7GXIds43Rb05dqksQuo2yCeuCbY5RBiMHX3d4nU 041jHBsv5wY24j0N6bpAsm/s0T0Mt7IO6UaN33I712oPlclTweYTAesW3jDpeQ7A ioi0CMjWZnRpUxorcFmzL/Cc/fPqgAtnAL5GIUuEOqUf8AlKmzsKcnKZ7L2d8mxG QqN16nlAiUuUpchQNMr+tAa1L5S1uK/fu6thVlSSk7KMQyJfVpwLy6068a1WmNj4 yxo9HaSeQNXh3cui+61qb9wlrkwlaiouw9+bpCmR0V8+XpWma/D/TEz9tg5vkfNo eG4t+FUQ7QgrrvIkDNFcRyTUO9cJHB+kcp2NgCcpCwan3wnuzKka9AWFAitpoAwx L6BX0L8kg/LzRPhkQnMOrj/tuu9hZrui4woqURhWLiYi2aZe7WCkuoqR/qMGP6qP EQRcvndTWkQo6K9BdCH4ZjRqcGbY1wFt/qgAxhi+uSo2IWiM1fRI4eRCGifpBtYK Dw44W9uPAu4cgVnAUzESEeW0bft5XXxAqpvyMBIdv3YqfVfOElZdKbteEu4YuOao FLpbk4ajCxO4Fzc9AugJ8iQOAoaekJWA7TjWJ6CbJe8w3thpznP0w6jNG8ZleZ6a jHckyGlx5wzQTRLVT5+wK6edFlxKmSd93jkLWWCbrc0Dsa39OkSTDmZPoZgKGRhp Yc0C4jePYreTGI6p7/H3AFv84o0fjHt5fn4GpT1Xgfg+1X/wmIv7iNQtljCjAqhD 6XN+QiOAYAloAym8lOm9zOoCDv1TSDpmeyeP0rNV95OozsmFAUaKSUcUFBUfq9FL uyr+rJZQw2DPfq2wE75PtOyJiZH7zljCh12fp5yrNx6L7HSqwwuG7vGO4f0ltYOZ dPKzaEhCOO7o108RexdNABEBAAG0Rldpa2lMZWFrcyBFZGl0b3JpYWwgT2ZmaWNl IEhpZ2ggU2VjdXJpdHkgQ29tbXVuaWNhdGlvbiBLZXkgKDIwMjEtMjAyNCmJBDEE EwEKACcFAmBjDtICGwMFCQWjmoAFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgIDAQACHgECF4AACgkQ nG3NFyg+RUzRbh+eMSKgMYOdoz70u4RKTvev4KyqCAlwji+1RomnW7qsAK+l1s6b ugOhOs8zYv2ZSy6lv5JgWITRZogvB69JP94+Juphol6LIImC9X3P/bcBLw7VCdNA mP0XQ4OlleLZWXUEW9EqR4QyM0RkPMoxXObfRgtGHKIkjZYXyGhUOd7MxRM8DBzN yieFf3CjZNADQnNBk/ZWRdJrpq8J1W0dNKI7IUW2yCyfdgnPAkX/lyIqw4ht5UxF VGrva3PoepPir0TeKP3M0BMxpsxYSVOdwcsnkMzMlQ7TOJlsEdtKQwxjV6a1vH+t k4TpR4aG8fS7ZtGzxcxPylhndiiRVwdYitr5nKeBP69aWH9uLcpIzplXm4DcusUc Bo8KHz+qlIjs03k8hRfqYhUGB96nK6TJ0xS7tN83WUFQXk29fWkXjQSp1Z5dNCcT sWQBTxWxwYyEI8iGErH2xnok3HTyMItdCGEVBBhGOs1uCHX3W3yW2CooWLC/8Pia qgss3V7m4SHSfl4pDeZJcAPiH3Fm00wlGUslVSziatXW3499f2QdSyNDw6Qc+chK hUFflmAaavtpTqXPk+Lzvtw5SSW+iRGmEQICKzD2chpy05mW5v6QUy+G29nchGDD rrfpId2Gy1VoyBx8FAto4+6BOWVijrOj9Boz7098huotDQgNoEnidvVdsqP+P1RR QJekr97idAV28i7iEOLd99d6qI5xRqc3/QsV+y2ZnnyKB10uQNVPLgUkQljqN0wP XmdVer+0X+aeTHUd1d64fcc6M0cpYefNNRCsTsgbnWD+x0rjS9RMo+Uosy41+IxJ 6qIBhNrMK6fEmQoZG3qTRPYYrDoaJdDJERN2E5yLxP2SPI0rWNjMSoPEA/gk5L91 m6bToM/0VkEJNJkpxU5fq5834s3PleW39ZdpI0HpBDGeEypo/t9oGDY3Pd7JrMOF zOTohxTyu4w2Ql7jgs+7KbO9PH0Fx5dTDmDq66jKIkkC7DI0QtMQclnmWWtn14BS KTSZoZekWESVYhORwmPEf32EPiC9t8zDRglXzPGmJAPISSQz+Cc9o1ipoSIkoCCh 2MWoSbn3KFA53vgsYd0vS/+Nw5aUksSleorFns2yFgp/w5Ygv0D007k6u3DqyRLB W5y6tJLvbC1ME7jCBoLW6nFEVxgDo727pqOpMVjGGx5zcEokPIRDMkW/lXjw+fTy c6misESDCAWbgzniG/iyt77Kz711unpOhw5aemI9LpOq17AiIbjzSZYt6b1Aq7Wr aB+C1yws2ivIl9ZYK911A1m69yuUg0DPK+uyL7Z86XC7hI8B0IY1MM/MbmFiDo6H dkfwUckE74sxxeJrFZKkBbkEAQRgYw7SAR+gvktRnaUrj/84Pu0oYVe49nPEcy/7 5Fs6LvAwAj+JcAQPW3uy7D7fuGFEQguasfRrhWY5R87+g5ria6qQT2/Sf19Tpngs d0Dd9DJ1MMTaA1pc5F7PQgoOVKo68fDXfjr76n1NchfCzQbozS1HoM8ys3WnKAw+ Neae9oymp2t9FB3B+To4nsvsOM9KM06ZfBILO9NtzbWhzaAyWwSrMOFFJfpyxZAQ 8VbucNDHkPJjhxuafreC9q2f316RlwdS+XjDggRY6xD77fHtzYea04UWuZidc5zL VpsuZR1nObXOgE+4s8LU5p6fo7jL0CRxvfFnDhSQg2Z617flsdjYAJ2JR4apg3Es G46xWl8xf7t227/0nXaCIMJI7g09FeOOsfCmBaf/ebfiXXnQbK2zCbbDYXbrYgw6 ESkSTt940lHtynnVmQBvZqSXY93MeKjSaQk1VKyobngqaDAIIzHxNCR941McGD7F qHHM2YMTgi6XXaDThNC6u5msI1l/24PPvrxkJxjPSGsNlCbXL2wqaDgrP6LvCP9O uooR9dVRxaZXcKQjeVGxrcRtoTSSyZimfjEercwi9RKHt42O5akPsXaOzeVjmvD9 EB5jrKBe/aAOHgHJEIgJhUNARJ9+dXm7GofpvtN/5RE6qlx11QGvoENHIgawGjGX Jy5oyRBS+e+KHcgVqbmV9bvIXdwiC4BDGxkXtjc75hTaGhnDpu69+Cq016cfsh+0 XaRnHRdh0SZfcYdEqqjn9CTILfNuiEpZm6hYOlrfgYQe1I13rgrnSV+EfVCOLF4L P9ejcf3eCvNhIhEjsBNEUDOFAA6J5+YqZvFYtjk3efpM2jCg6XTLZWaI8kCuADMu yrQxGrM8yIGvBndrlmmljUqlc8/Nq9rcLVFDsVqb9wOZjrCIJ7GEUD6bRuolmRPE SLrpP5mDS+wetdhLn5ME1e9JeVkiSVSFIGsumZTNUaT0a90L4yNj5gBE40dvFplW 7TLeNE/ewDQk5LiIrfWuTUn3CqpjIOXxsZFLjieNgofX1nSeLjy3tnJwuTYQlVJO 3CbqH1k6cOIvE9XShnnuxmiSoav4uZIXnLZFQRT9v8UPIuedp7TO8Vjl0xRTajCL PdTk21e7fYriax62IssYcsbbo5G5auEdPO04H/+v/hxmRsGIr3XYvSi4ZWXKASxy a/jHFu9zEqmy0EBzFzpmSx+FrzpMKPkoU7RbxzMgZwIYEBk66Hh6gxllL0JmWjV0 iqmJMtOERE4NgYgumQT3dTxKuFtywmFxBTe80BhGlfUbjBtiSrULq59np4ztwlRT wDEAVDoZbN57aEXhQ8jjF2RlHtqGXhFMrg9fALHaRQARAQABiQQZBBgBCgAPBQJg Yw7SAhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJEJxtzRcoPkVMdigfoK4oBYoxVoWUBCUekCg/alVGyEHa ekvFmd3LYSKX/WklAY7cAgL/1UlLIFXbq9jpGXJUmLZBkzXkOylF9FIXNNTFAmBM 3TRjfPv91D8EhrHJW0SlECN+riBLtfIQV9Y1BUlQthxFPtB1G1fGrv4XR9Y4TsRj VSo78cNMQY6/89Kc00ip7tdLeFUHtKcJs+5EfDQgagf8pSfF/TWnYZOMN2mAPRRf fh3SkFXeuM7PU/X0B6FJNXefGJbmfJBOXFbaSRnkacTOE9caftRKN1LHBAr8/RPk pc9p6y9RBc/+6rLuLRZpn2W3m3kwzb4scDtHHFXXQBNC1ytrqdwxU7kcaJEPOFfC XIdKfXw9AQll620qPFmVIPH5qfoZzjk4iTH06Yiq7PI4OgDis6bZKHKyyzFisOkh DXiTuuDnzgcu0U4gzL+bkxJ2QRdiyZdKJJMswbm5JDpX6PLsrzPmN314lKIHQx3t NNXkbfHL/PxuoUtWLKg7/I3PNnOgNnDqCgqpHJuhU1AZeIkvewHsYu+urT67tnpJ AK1Z4CgRxpgbYA4YEV1rWVAPHX1u1okcg85rc5FHK8zh46zQY1wzUTWubAcxqp9K 1IqjXDDkMgIX2Z2fOA1plJSwugUCbFjn4sbT0t0YuiEFMPMB42ZCjcCyA1yysfAd DYAmSer1bq47tyTFQwP+2ZnvW/9p3yJ4oYWzwMzadR3T0K4sgXRC2Us9nPL9k2K5 TRwZ07wE2CyMpUv+hZ4ja13A/1ynJZDZGKys+pmBNrO6abxTGohM8LIWjS+YBPIq trxh8jxzgLazKvMGmaA6KaOGwS8vhfPfxZsu2TJaRPrZMa/HpZ2aEHwxXRy4nm9G Kx1eFNJO6Ues5T7KlRtl8gflI5wZCCD/4T5rto3SfG0s0jr3iAVb3NCn9Q73kiph PSwHuRxcm+hWNszjJg3/W+Fr8fdXAh5i0JzMNscuFAQNHgfhLigenq+BpCnZzXya 01kqX24AdoSIbH++vvgE0Bjj6mzuRrH5VJ1Qg9nQ+yMjBWZADljtp3CARUbNkiIg tUJ8IJHCGVwXZBqY4qeJc3h/RiwWM2UIFfBZ+E06QPznmVLSkwvvop3zkr4eYNez cIKUju8vRdW6sxaaxC/GECDlP0Wo6lH0uChpE3NJ1daoXIeymajmYxNt+drz7+pd jMqjDtNA2rgUrjptUgJK8ZLdOQ4WCrPY5pP9ZXAO7+mK7S3u9CTywSJmQpypd8hv 8Bu8jKZdoxOJXxj8CphK951eNOLYxTOxBUNB8J2lgKbmLIyPvBvbS1l1lCM5oHlw WXGlp70pspj3kaX4mOiFaWMKHhOLb+er8yh8jspM184= =5a6T -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- *​**Correct The Record Monday November 24, 2014 Morning Roundup:* *Headlines:* *Bloomberg: “Hillary Clinton Leads in New Hampshire by Historic Margin” <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-24/hillary-clinton-leads-in-new-hampshire-by-historic-margin-bloomberg-politicssaint-anselm-new-hampshire-poll>* “Sixty-two percent of likely Democratic voters in the early primary state said they support Clinton in a new Bloomberg Politics/Saint Anselm New Hampshire Poll of likely primary voters conducted by Purple Insights.” *New York Times: “Authors Sign Up to Raise Barnes & Noble’s Sales” <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/business/media/authors-sign-up-to-raise-barnes-nobles-sales-.html>* “In an effort to increase holiday sales, which have fallen for the last two seasons, Barnes & Noble is hoping to lure customers into stores this Black Friday with something book lovers cannot download: signed copies. The chain recruited 100 prominent authors — including Donna Tartt, David Mitchell, Dan Brown, E. L. James, Jeff Kinney, George W. Bush and Hillary Clinton — to each sign roughly 5,000 copies of their latest books.” *Washington Post: “For Democrats, Hillary Clinton just has to say ‘Go.’ For voters, she’ll have to say much more.” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/it-was-a-big-day-in-the-big-apple-for-hillary-clinton/2014/11/22/3ef252f8-725d-11e4-a2c2-478179fd0489_story.html>* “Ready for Hillary started on a shoestring, dismissed by some in Clinton world as a quixotic enterprise. It has grown into something far more important and valuable to a potential candidate…” *Talking Points Memo: “Hillary's Biggest 2016 Challenge Might Start With An 'O'” <http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/hillary-clinton-obama-approval-rating-2016>* “The record tells us that, however the Obama presidency is faring like in its final months, it's going to influence his aspiring successor's White House ambitions.” *Real Clear Politics: “Carville: ‘There's Not Much Appetite In Democratic Party For Somebody Other Than Hillary Clinton’” <http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/11/23/carville_theres_not_much_appetite_in_democratic_party_for_somebody_other_than_hillary_clinton.html>* “On Sunday's edition of This Week, Democratic strategist James Carville said there's not much appetite for someone other than Hillary Clinton in the Democratic party and Democrats across the nation.” *The Daily Beast: Jeff Greenfield: “Want President Hillary? Then Primary Her” <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/24/want-president-hillary-then-primary-her.html>* “It would be even more helpful to her election prospects if she were confronted in the primary with questions more likely to be raised by the Republican nominee in the fall: was the Russian “reset” policy naive? Was it wise for the US to leave Iraq without even a residual force in place? What specific aspect of US foreign policy was changed for the better under her watch? Does she agree that the Affordable Care Act was offered to the public under false pretenses?” *Politico: “Mitch McConnell preps for 2016 battle” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/mitch-mcconnell-2016-senate-elections-113123.html>* “Hillary Clinton could end up at the top of the ballot if she decides to run and becomes the party’s nominee, a scenario that could boost turnout, giving Democrats hope that they can increase the gender gap among women voters after seeing it shrink in 2014.” *Articles:* *Bloomberg: “Hillary Clinton Leads in New Hampshire by Historic Margin” <http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-11-24/hillary-clinton-leads-in-new-hampshire-by-historic-margin-bloomberg-politicssaint-anselm-new-hampshire-poll>* By Lisa Lerer November 24, 2014, 6:01 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] New Hampshire primary voters are ready for Hillary, though they have some questions about the Democrats. Hillary Clinton holds a historic lead in the New Hampshire Democratic primary, although a shift in opinion about the party's brand could be a drag on her candidacy in the general election. Sixty-two percent of likely Democratic voters in the early primary state said they support Clinton in a new Bloomberg Politics/Saint Anselm New Hampshire Poll of likely primary voters conducted by Purple Insights. It's an advantage that puts her in elite company: Only former Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy in 1980 and former Vice President Al Gore in 2000 have broken the 50 percent mark more than six months before the primary. “Clinton's numbers are so strong that it seems inconceivable that she could have any serious challenger,” said Neil Levesque, executive director of the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College. While she leads in the primary, the results harbor dangerous signals for Democrats. When asked which party's nominee is more likely to “care about people like you,” a trait traditionally associated with Clinton's party, voters were almost equally divided, with 40 percent saying Democrats and 39 percent picking Republicans. In exit polls conducted after the 2012 presidential election, 55 percent of New Hampshire voters sided with President Barack Obama and 42 percent with former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney when asked to select the candidate who “is more in touch with people like you.” “Republicans are sticking to pocketbook issues and focusing on reigning the government in,” said Kerry Marsh, a Manchester-based Republican strategist with Spectrum Marketing Companies. “I think we're finally doing that right.” Though New Hampshire is a small state, it has voted for the winner of the White House in eight of the last nine presidential elections. Clinton runs nearly even with Romney in a head-to-head match-up, with 46 percent of likely general election voters selecting the former first lady and secretary of state and 45 percent selecting the former Massachusetts governor. She has a wider lead—7 percentage points—against Kentucky Senator Rand Paul and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, whom she beats 47-39 among the same group. A surprise upset by Clinton in 2008 saved her presidential bid and marked the start of a five-month primary slog with Obama. “As I caution all presidential candidates in New Hampshire, taking New Hampshire for granted is very dangerous,” said Terry Shumaker, a Manchester attorney and Clinton supporter. “Last time, I believe, Hillary Clinton had an almost 30-point lead in the polls in our state in the summer. That lead melted like an ice sculpture on the mall in July and she came back and won our primary by three points.” Her primary win highlighted another quirk of the Granite State: women rule. Female politicians currently hold the governor's mansion and every seat in the congressional delegation. (That will change in January, when Republican Frank Guinta replaces Democrat Carol Shea-Porter.) “Unlike past human history, being a woman in New Hampshire is an advantage in any Democratic primary and with the independents as well,” said Ray Buckley, the chairman of the New Hampshire Democratic Party. “All things being equal, our primary voters would tend to vote for a woman.” Among all likely voters in the state, Clinton has the highest favorability rating with 51 percent of voters expressing a positive opinion about her. Republican Senator Kelly Ayotte and Romney, who owns a vacation home in the state, came in second at 47 percent each. While her lead hardly guarantees the nomination, Clinton's dominance in the early polling may deter other Democrats from jumping into the race. Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, at 13 percent support, comes the closest to Clinton of any potential Democratic challenger, though voters are pretty much split in their opinions of her with 34 percent rating her favorably and 35 percent giving her a negative review. Other candidates, including Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley, Vice President Joe Biden, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, and independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, lag in the single digits. New Hampshire Democrats attribute at least a piece of her edge to the Clinton family's long history in the state. “Former President Bill Clinton has been here yearly for decades,” Buckley said. “They first came up in '79. So, there's a long, long relationship with the Clintons' and New Hampshire.” The poll, which was conducted Nov. 12-18, has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 percent for questions regarding the Democratic primary, and 4.4 percent for those asked of all likely voters. *New York Times: “Authors Sign Up to Raise Barnes & Noble’s Sales” <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/business/media/authors-sign-up-to-raise-barnes-nobles-sales-.html>* By Alexandra Alter November 23, 2014 In an effort to increase holiday sales, which have fallen for the last two seasons, Barnes & Noble is hoping to lure customers into stores this Black Friday with something book lovers cannot download: signed copies. The chain recruited 100 prominent authors — including Donna Tartt, David Mitchell, Dan Brown, E. L. James, Jeff Kinney, George W. Bush and Hillary Clinton — to each sign roughly 5,000 copies of their latest books. The company will distribute the 500,000 signed books among its more than 650 retail stores. “Customers get inundated with discounts and offers from every other retailer,” said Mary Amicucci, vice president for adult trade and children’s books at Barnes & Noble. “The goal was to find an exciting reason for people to come to Barnes & Noble early in the morning and get something that they can’t get on any other day of the year.” Drawing customers into its physical stores has become an urgent priority for Barnes & Noble. The chain has been battered in recent years by competition from Amazon and by a sluggish book market. It has closed more than 20 stores since summer 2013 and will spin off its money-losing Nook division into a separate company next year. Holiday sales at its retail stores and website have declined for the last two seasons. In 2013, sales in the nine-week holiday period fell nearly 7 percent to $1.1 billion compared with the previous year, and in 2012, sales fell nearly 11 percent to $1.2 billion. Ms. Amicucci said the initiative began seven months ago when Barnes & Noble compiled a wish list of 50 authors. When the first batch of authors responded enthusiastically, the company recruited another 50. Some authors went further, adding little illustrations to the books. Brandon Stanton, the author of “Humans of New York,” drew dinosaurs, while Mo Willems, a children’s book author, sketched his popular pigeon character. Some authors said they hoped the new campaign would help the struggling chain. “The presence of a bookstore in a neighborhood matters,” said Lisa Scottoline, who signed 5,000 copies of her novel “Betrayed.” “If it’s not physically present, we will have fewer readers.” David Baldacci, who signed several thousand copies of his new book, “The Escape,” said he hoped the effort would help the last big bookstore chain standing to better compete against Amazon. “You can go online and buy any book you want, but there’s not a lot of excitement with clicking the buy button,” he said. Independent bookstores are also counting on authors to draw customers for the holidays, a period when many of them make as much as 30 percent of their annual sales. As part of the American Booksellers Association’s “Indies First” holiday initiative, about 1,200 authors will sign books, greet customers and, in some cases, work behind the counter at more than 400 independent bookstores around the country this Saturday. As part of the effort, the fantasy and graphic novelist Neil Gaiman and his wife, the author, musician and performance artist Amanda Palmer, will be at the Golden Notebook in Woodstock, N.Y., and two other New York bookstores; Geraldine Brooks will work alongside booksellers at Bunch of Grapes Bookstore in Vineyard Haven, Mass.; and Sherman Alexie will volunteer at three Seattle-area bookstores. Oren Teicher, chief executive of the American Booksellers Association, said author appearances and signed copies were among the best weapons brick-and-mortar stores had against online retailers. “Books are identical no matter where you buy them,” he said. “You don’t get a different or better ending if you buy them from us.” *Washington Post: “For Democrats, Hillary Clinton just has to say ‘Go.’ For voters, she’ll have to say much more.” <http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/it-was-a-big-day-in-the-big-apple-for-hillary-clinton/2014/11/22/3ef252f8-725d-11e4-a2c2-478179fd0489_story.html>* By Dan Balz November 22, 2014 NEW YORK — It was all Hillary Clinton, all day, Friday in New York, a day that helped crystallize how much already has been done for the prospective presidential candidate by others and, more importantly, what she has yet to do for herself. The events included a day-long session for the donors to Ready for Hillary, the political action committee founded in early 2013 to help encourage Clinton to run for president. She did not appear at the event, but many of the Clinton clique were there. In the evening, it was the former secretary of state herself in the limelight at a black-tie gala hosted by the New-York Historical Society Museum & Library, where she was given the History Makers award. Ready for Hillary started on a shoestring, dismissed by some in Clinton world as a quixotic enterprise. It has grown into something far more important and valuable to a potential candidate whose top-down campaign in 2008 was one (but not the only) factor that led to her defeat to Barack Obama in the contest for the Democratic nomination. Because of the work of Ready for Hillary, if Clinton decides to run for president, she will instantly have access to what the group’s leaders say is a list of roughly 3 million people who have signed up as supporters, volunteers, donors or all of the above. Ready for Hillary will shut down if and when Clinton announces her candidacy. The list can’t simply be handed over to her, but she will easily be able to convert fruits of the organization’s efforts into a Hillary for President ground army. Many people deserve credit for this. One is Adam Parkhomenko, the young and tireless co-founder of the group, who has been looking to help make Clinton president of the United States since he was in high school and who overcame the doubters with his energy and a strategic grasp of the techniques and imperatives of the most modern of campaigns. Another who gets credit is Craig Smith, who has been part of the Clintons’ world for more than two decades and whose arrival at Ready for Hillary signaled to many longtime Clinton loyalists — and donors — that the organization deserved their backing, financial and otherwise. About $10 million has been raised since the founding. Friday’s gathering in New York seemed very much like both a Clinton political family reunion and the gathering-before-the-storm. In attendance were scores of people from across the country, many of them instrumental in helping Bill Clinton become president, some who served him as president, and all of them now are just as determined to see Hillary Clinton get to the White House in her own right. The speakers constituted a who’s who of Clinton loyalists, from strategists James Carville and Paul Begala to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to former White House deputy chief of staff Harold Ickes. Equally notable were those from Obama’s political orbit and others who are now part of the Ready for Hillary operation or any of the other pro-Clinton political committees and organizations that have been founded in the past two years. Without doing anything other than not saying “no” to a second presidential campaign, without having to make any of the hard calls of putting a campaign together, Hillary Clinton has benefitted enormously from the work of all these people. It’s fair to say that no one seeking the Democratic nomination — no one who wasn’t already an incumbent president at least — will have the kind of machinery in place that now exists for her. One example: Jerry Crawford, the Iowan who has been a top adviser through all the Clintons’ campaigns, told reporters Friday that the work of Ready For Hillary has been “extraordinary” in preparing for a 2016 candidacy. “We will be at or beyond on day one of the Clinton campaign, if and when it comes, where we ended up last time,” he said. What Clinton hasn’t yet done for herself, however, remains the key to her real hopes of winning the White House. One is to organize a campaign that is more disciplined and more strategic than her campaign of 2008. She cannot afford another messy campaign operation, and how she avoids that will take considerable thinking. Still, machinery doesn’t win elections, which means the second and more important step for her is to know exactly why she wants to run for president again and how she is alike and different from her husband and Obama, and then to be able to articulate those reasons in a compelling and forward-looking message. Clinton is nibbled from all sides as she thinks through the rationale for a campaign. On the left are rising demands for a populist economic message of the kind associated with Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. She has edged toward that, but sometimes awkwardly, as when she said last month, “businesses don’t create jobs,” a shorthand that baffled nearly everyone by its inarticulateness. For Bill Clinton, opportunity — not class warfare — long has been at the core of his message. Hillary Clinton, however, runs in different times than did her husband, a time of greater inequality and underlying frustration. The balancing act is more challenging today than it was for him. At the award dinner Friday night, Hillary Clinton picked up on the theme of opportunity in a conversation with author Walter Isaacson. He asked her how having a granddaughter has affected her thinking. After the usual grandmotherly statements about how special her granddaughter is and will be, she took note of the world of privilege into which baby Charlotte was born and will be raised. But then she noted that many other children born on the same day as her granddaughter would grow up in circumstances far more challenged and challenging. “Talent is universal,” she said. “Opportunity is not.” Can candidate Clinton articulate with both specificity and inspiration how to widen the circle of opportunity? Her prospective candidacy offers the possibility of the first female president in history, but for all the power behind that aspiration, it is not a message. Nor, as the midterms proved, are narrow appeals to women of the kind that fell short for Democratic candidates for Senate in Iowa and Colorado — two states vitally important in a general election. Nor can she count on the “demography is destiny” theme that many Democrats see as their ace in the hole in future presidential campaigns. In the corridors at the Ready For Hillary meeting, more than one Clinton loyalist said that will not be enough to win in 2016. The black-tie dinner was also a reminder of the potential gap between Clinton and the voters she will appeal to if she is a candidate. Much of the conversation with Isaacson was about the Roosevelts — Franklin, Eleanor and Teddy. One point made by both Clinton and Isaacson was that while the Roosevelts came from privileged circumstances, they found in public service ways to advocate for those without. At the Ready For Hillary meeting, one person, who did not want to be identified in order to speak more candidly, said she should run for president not as Hillary Clinton but as “Hillary Smith,” shorn of accolades and awards that have come at her for so many years. It was good advice, not exactly starting over, but starting fresh. What Friday reinforced is what many in her party recognize. Democrats may be ready for Hillary. The bigger question is: When will Hillary be ready? *Talking Points Memo: “Hillary's Biggest 2016 Challenge Might Start With An 'O'” <http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/hillary-clinton-obama-approval-rating-2016>* By Dylan Scott November 24, 2014, 6:00 a.m. EST One of the most important elements of a Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential candidacy might be completely out of her hands. Two of the favored rhetorical questions around her presumed bid are: How much will she distance herself from President Barack Obama? And, relatedly, will she be able to capture the Obama coalition that propelled the President to victory twice, but hasn't shown up in the midterm elections? They are of course linked: If Obama is unpopular, a Clinton campaign will be tempted to present a sharp contrast. At the same time, the President will likely remain popular with the core Democratic base that she needs to harness. But the record tells us that, however the Obama presidency is faring like in its final months, it's going to influence his aspiring successor's White House ambitions. The third-term problem is a historical fact at this point: U.S. voters just don't choose to give a party three (or more) consecutive terms in the White House. Since FDR, George H.W. Bush is the only President to be elected to succeed a two-term predecessor from the same party. Political scientists have documented the link between presidential approval rating and final vote tallies (regardless of whether it is an open election or an incumbent is running.) In a 2012 book, "The Timeline of Presidential Elections", Columbia University's Robert Erikson and the University of Texas's Christopher Wlezien concluded that presidential approval rating is one of the best indicators of what the actual vote will look like. "(Obama's) approval rating has real bearing on 2016," Wlezien told TPM in an email. The link might not be as strong as it otherwise would be when a President is running for re-election, John Sides, a political scientist at George Washington University, told TPM. But based on his own look at the data, Sides said, it still has an effect on an open race, as 2016 will be. "When the incumbent is not running, better approval ratings still appear to help the incumbent party's new candidate," he said, "but the relationship is weaker." If better approval ratings help, then worse ones could surely hurt. Obama is currently sitting at 42 percent, according to Gallup. He was at 52 percent when he won re-election in 2012 with 51 percent of the popular vote. Reagan was polling at 51 percent in October 1988 and Bush took 53 percent of the popular vote, per the archive of Gallup polls compiled by the University of Connecticut. Much has already been made of any moments in which Clinton has been perceived to be distancing herself from the President. The response to her interview with The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg, in which she appeared to criticize the Obama White House's "don't do stupid stuff" mantra in foreign policy, was a classic example. It can sometimes be overwrought. Things could certainly change by November 2016. Reagan sank as low as 43 percent in March 1987 by the end of the Iran Contra scandal. He had managed to recover by the time Bush was on the ballot. Still, it will be important for Clinton to avoid being lumped in with the Obama administration or even the first Clinton administration, one Democratic strategist advocating for a Hillary 2016 bid said. "If she decides to run, she should not run as a third Bill Clinton term or a third Barack Obama term," Craig Smith, Clinton White House political director and a senior adviser to the Ready for Hillary PAC, said on Friday when asked by TPM. "She should run for a first Hillary Clinton term." How easy will that be, given the historical precedents and her tenure as one of the top Cabinet officials in the Obama administration? "As long as she lays out a clear vision of where she wants to take this country and a clear message about why she's doing this," he said, "I think it'll be fine." Republicans, for their part, seem intent on linking Clinton to the Obama presidency as frequently as possible. It has already become a staple of GOP messaging, and the anti-Clinton PAC America Rising has purchased an online home for it: Obama3rdTerm.com. "There is no major issue in which Sec. Clinton and President Obama disagree. She was the Mother of Obamacare, the face of his foreign policy, and a behind the scenes advocate for all his domestic initiatives," Tim Miller, America Rising PAC's executive director, told TPM in an email. "Any idea that she will be able to effectively distance herself from him ignores reality." *Real Clear Politics: “Carville: ‘There's Not Much Appetite In Democratic Party For Somebody Other Than Hillary Clinton’” <http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/11/23/carville_theres_not_much_appetite_in_democratic_party_for_somebody_other_than_hillary_clinton.html>* [No Writer Mentioned] November 23, 2014 On Sunday's edition of This Week, Democratic strategist James Carville said there's not much appetite for someone other than Hillary Clinton in the Democratic party and Democrats across the nation. "When Secretary Clinton runs," Carville definitively said, "she's going to run on her own agenda and think there's going to be a lot." "There's not much appetite in the Democratic party and around the country for somebody other than Hillary Clinton. This is something that they make up," Carville said to host George Stephanopoulos. "The Republicans will need all the help they want to win a presidential race. I'm not worried. Everything helps Republicans if you listen to them. Obama helps Republicans. Hillary is going to help Republicans. I mean, the sun coming up helps Republicans. Why don't they win some elections?" Carville added. JAMES CARVILLE: All evidence is from '94 to '96, from 2010 to 2012. All evidence is that it doesn't matter. It's a different kind of an event. Now, I think that when Secretary Clinton runs, she's going to run on her own agenda and think there's going to be a lot. I think she's going to take this thing very seriously, is going to run very hard and I think -- GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, THIS WEEK: where does she break for President Obama? where does she break from President Obama? CARVILLE: I think she'll say he's done remarkable things as president but the one thing we haven't done -- the great unfinished work for this nation is how do we build a middle class and that was the one thing that I want to do. That is the great that the United States is faced with is we have lost our essence because we're becoming too separated by income and everything else. I think that's her message and she can be as critical as she wants about that... I think that beltway liberals -- and I believe this, and I really respect you and I like your magazine (The Nation), there's not much appetite in the Democratic party and around the country for somebody other than Hillary Clinton. This is something that they make up -- MATTHEW DOWD, ABC NEWS: It's true and it's going to help Republicans in the general election. CARVILLE: Again, I go out there -- DR. BEN CARSON: I agree with you. CARVILLE: And you go watch it. The Republicans will need all the help they want to win a presidential race. I'm not worried. Everything helps Republicans if you listen to them. Obama helps Republicans. Hillary is going to help Republicans. I mean, the sun coming up helps Republicans. Why don't they win some elections? *The Daily Beast: Jeff Greenfield: “Want President Hillary? Then Primary Her” <http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/11/24/want-president-hillary-then-primary-her.html>* By Jeff Greenfield November 24, 2014 [Subtitle:] How Michael Dukakis’s failure in 1988 shows how helpful a tough, drawn-out primary can be for the Democratic frontrunner. I asked Google to find stories about a potential challenge to Hillary Clinton’s presumed Presidential run, and in about a third of a second, I was offered 37,500,000 of them. There’s no point in recycling the same list of possible foes, nor the competing arguments for and against a contested nomination. (There’s an excellent take that appeared on this site last September: Yes, sometimes a contest be invigorating—Reagan in ’80, Clinton in ’92, Obama in ’08—and sometimes it can open wounds that never heal—Goldwater in ’64, McGovern in ’72, Ford in ’76, Carter in ’80. But if you’re looking for a telling example of a politically helpful primary challenge, there’s no better example than one that should have happened, almost happened, but didn’t. It happened—or didn’t—in 1988, when Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis was grinding his way to the Democratic nomination. Two potentially major rivals had long since been sidelined: Senator Joe Biden by charges of plagiarism, and former Senator Gary Hart by—well, you know. Those in the race—Senator Paul Simon, Rep. Dick Gephardt, Rev. Jesse Jackson—were far behind. Another dark horse, Tennessee Senator Al Gore, was finding little traction in his efforts to become a centrist alternative. Gore’s last stand would be in the New York primary. On April 12, during a debate sponsored by the Daily News, Gore confronted Dukakis with an issue that had not surfaced at any time during the campaign. Why, Gore wanted to know, did Dukakis support a state program that gave weekend furloughs to convicted criminals, even after some of those prisoners had committed crimes while on furlough? The audience booed the question, Dukakis went on to win the New York primary convincingly, and Gore dropped out of the Presidential race. If you’re familiar with recent political history, you know what happened next. James Pinkerton, a policy aide in the campaign of George H.W. Bush, found press reports that detailed the story of Willie Horton—a convicted murder who, while out on furlough, had terrorized a Maryland couple and raped the woman. Bush campaign chief Lee Atwater watched focus groups move sharply away from Dukakis when they learned of the story. (Atwater said at one point that by the time the campaign was over, voters would think of Horton as Dukakis’ running mate). Bush himself raised the furlough issue—without mentioning Horton by name—during his RNC acceptance speech, and the campaign featured an ad showing showing men in prison garb moving through a revolving door. Then an independent campaign—the National Security Political Action Committee—put on its own ad, showing the mug shot of Willie Horton looking very menacing and very, very black. To this day, Bush media maven Roger Ailes adamantly denies that he or the campaign had any role in the Willie Horton mug shot ad. And to this day, liberals in the political world use the name “Willie Horton” to describe an appeal to primal racial fears. Now consider a different question: suppose Al Gore had stayed in the race. Or suppose another of Dukakis’ opponents—Jesse Jackson, most intriguingly—had kept the question alive. Was it really a good idea to furlough convicted murderers? Was it a mistake to veto the bill that would have curtailed such furloughs? For a one-time political operative like myself, it offers the possibility of a rarely seen event in campaigns: the open, frank admission of a mistake. “Candidates always like to tell you what they did right,” I imagine Dukakis saying. “Now I want to tell you what I did wrong—and what I learned from it. Giving prisoners a chance at redemption is a good idea; but we were too careless, and innocent people suffered because it it. I think it taught me to ask harder questions about good intentions; it’s a lesson I intend to remember as President.” I’m not suggesting that it would have changed the outcome of the 1988 election; and you have to question the overall tactical shrewdness of any campaign that sent its candidate riding around in a tank looking like Snoopy heading out to fight the Red Baron. What the “missing furlough” debate does tell us, however, is that a candidate who is not confronted by a tough policy challenge in a primary may wind up unprepared for that challenge in the fall, which of course is the moment when it matters most. Republicans, for example, may have found intra-party attacks on Mitt Romney’s business career offensive; they are, after all, the party of the “builders”. Democrats, as Romney should have remembered from his campaigns in Massachusetts, have no such compunctions. Democrats will not take kindly to criticism of pubic employee unions, which provide cash and foot soldiers for the party; a candidate too close to those unions should not be surprised to find herself under fire come Autumn. How does this apply to She Who Must Always Be Named? Much of the conversation has focused on potential challenges from the Left. Is Clinton too close to the Wall Street-Goldman Sachs wing of the Democratic Party? Does she need to distance herself from the deregulatory policies of the Bill Clinton years? Is she too hawkish for the activists who helped make her vote for the Iraq War so costly back in the 2008 campaign? It would be even more helpful to her election prospects if she were confronted in the primary with questions more likely to be raised by the Republican nominee in the fall: was the Russian “reset” policy naive? Was it wise for the US to leave Iraq without even a residual force in place? What specific aspect of US foreign policy was changed for the better under her watch? Does she agree that the Affordable Care Act was offered to the public under false pretenses? If these issues raise uncomfortable questions for Democrats, Clinton has reasons not to be too unsettled. She no doubt remembers that another candidate for President had to explain his break with many root assumptions that Democrats held about issues ranging from crime to trade to welfare. And that debate during the 1992 primaries worked out pretty well for the nominee. *Politico: “Mitch McConnell preps for 2016 battle” <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/mitch-mcconnell-2016-senate-elections-113123.html>* By Manu Raju November 24, 2014, 5:39 a.m. EST [Subtitle:] Facing a daunting map, Republicans are already plotting ways to hang onto their new Senate majority. Mitch McConnell spent years charting the Republican path back to power — and now he’s already plotting to make sure they don’t lose it. The Kentucky Republican is quietly pushing his fellow Republican senators to beef up their political shops. He’s considering a new super PAC that could spend millions on Senate races. And he’s locking down operatives for another cycle who were key to GOP triumphs this month. The under-the-radar moves less than three weeks after the 2014 midterms and a month-and-a-half before McConnell takes over for Harry Reid makes clear the brutal reality in front of Republicans: Their majority could be short lived. Republicans face a daunting map in 2016, when they will be forced to defend 24 seats in a presidential year, while Democrats have to defend only 10 seats — a scenario McConnell is taking so seriously he’s leaving nothing to chance, starting now. “You can start too late, but never too soon,” McConnell said in an interview in the Capitol hallways last week, citing the words of the late Happy Chandler, a former Kentucky senator turned commissioner of baseball. Last week, McConnell summoned all 24 Republicans up for reelection in 2016 to a morning meeting at the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which was even attended by potential 2016 presidential candidates like Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who has said he wouldn’t run for the White House and Senate at the same time. At the meeting, McConnell and Mississippi Sen. Roger Wicker, the new NRSC chairman, made a blunt declaration to their colleagues: Reelection, they said, starts now. With the NRSC’s new executive director, Ward Baker, and the deputy executive director, Kevin McLaughlin, the two GOP operatives made a presentation of how much campaigns have changed since the senators last ran in 2010, even noting iPhones were just a couple years old back then and iPads had just come on market. They implored their candidates to begin a heavy fundraising push immediately, and tried to tell them on what to expect in the ad war. For instance, the GOP projected based on past trends that 83,000 radio and TV spots from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee alone would air in all 2016 Senate races. And McConnell detailed how he shrewdly adjusted his tactics to pull off a resounding primary and general election victory for a sixth term in 2014. In the 35-minute discussion, the GOP leaders and top operatives also urged Republican senators to immediately hire their own pollsters, consultants and staff, given there will be a major competition for operatives with the crowded 2016 GOP presidential primary about to take shape. If there are certain staff who need training, they said, the NRSC was prepared to help groom them. “Members need to begin to do the things to tool their campaigns differently, to understand the significant change in resource needs,” Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) said, recounting the message from the meeting. “And now is the time to begin to think about the mechanics of the campaigns.” Burr, who is up for reelection for a third term in 2016, has just $720,000 in cash in a state where more than $100 million was spent in the 2014 North Carolina Senate race, in which Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan narrowly lost to Republican Thom Tillis. But despite the lack of money, Burr said he plans on running and even seemed ready to take on Hagan if she were to run against him. “Repeats in North Carolina, historically, don’t work too well,” Burr said in an interview. “You have to ask yourself, how many people will write a check to somebody who just lost?” In 2014, retirements became a major problem for Democrats, as they lost open seats vacated by retiring members in Montana, West Virginia and South Dakota. McConnell, a former NRSC chairman himself who has spent years studying campaigns in other states and spent an inordinate amount of time strategizing with NRSC officials this past cycle, is expected to eventually set a deadline for when lawmakers need to announce whether they will retire. Illinois Sen. Mark Kirk, a freshman Republican who suffered a stroke in 2012 and travels around the Capitol in a wheelchair, said he was “doing everything possible” to prepare for a run and win potentially tough primary and general election races in 2016. Other potential retirees, like Indiana Sen. Dan Coats and Arizona Sen. John McCain, have also sent signals they are likely to run again, buoyed by the fact that they are no longer in the minority. After last week’s NRSC meeting, Wicker felt bullish. “I don’t expect any [GOP] retirements,” Wicker said confidently in an interview. “I do not. I think we are excited about the chance to govern, the chance to legislate as the founders intended, I think there’s a lot of enthusiasm, yes.” Donors, he said, are feeling much happier, and many have dumped big bucks early into the campaign accounts of Republican senators who have held a bevy of fundraisers at the NRSC since Election Day. “People need to start to get prepared,” said Texas Sen. John Cornyn, the No. 2 Senate Republican who attended the meeting. The Republican path to keep the Senate won’t be easy. They have to defend seats in blue states and swing states, like Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Ohio, Florida, Illinois and Wisconsin — compared to just 10 for Democrats. Moreover, Democrats could have some serious statewide recruits. In recent interviews, two Democratic senators who lost this year — Arkansas’ Mark Pryor and Alaska’s Mark Begich — punted on their intentions to run in 2016 in their respective states, though they didn’t rule it out. “We’ll see,” Begich said when asked if he’d run against Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) in 2016. Plus, Hillary Clinton could end up at the top of the ballot if she decides to run and becomes the party’s nominee, a scenario that could boost turnout, giving Democrats hope that they can increase the gender gap among women voters after seeing it shrink in 2014. With Democratic turnout typically higher in an election year and a big-spending Democratic super PAC, Senate Majority PAC, prepared to dump tens of millions into the effort to bring its party back to the majority, McConnell is seeking more effective ways to spend GOP money. Josh Holmes, McConnell’s chief political adviser, is holding private conversations with donors and operatives to see if there’s interest to form a new super PAC dedicated to helping Senate Republicans retain the majority. Currently, a bevy of big-spending GOP outside groups influence key races, including the Karl Rove-linked American Crossroads, as well as the Koch brothers’ Americans for Prosperity. But in 2016, their attention may focus on the presidential race. Plus, Holmes has identified at least $8 million spent by smaller super PACs on individual races in 2014 that Republicans believe could have been better spent this cycle. Holmes declined to comment, but a decision on whether to create a specific Senate GOP super PAC is expected to be made by the first quarter of the year. So far, Wicker said, GOP donors are feeling good. “In 2012, we got off to a tough start because our donors were so discouraged that we actually lost ground in the Senate as well as the presidency,” Wicker said. “We’re now in an era of good feeling and our donors believe in us and we need to get started early.” One of the ways to instill confidence was to ensure there is continuity at the NRSC. McConnell sung the praises of Baker during the 2014 elections and pushed for him to stay. McLaughlin, a close friend of Holmes’, was a key force in the GOP effort to train Republican candidates in 2014 and avoid the Todd Akin-like gaffes that doomed past Republican chances. The NRSC team didn’t wait until after November to begin pushing Republicans up in 2016 to get their campaigns in order. Since May, top NRSC officials have held three meetings with the chiefs of staff for all of the 24 Republican senators, including one right before the election. The No. 1 goal for the party, the GOP operatives said, is incumbent retention, something that Republicans recognize won’t be easy in 2016. “Obviously, I’m going to be the No. 1 target,” said Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) when asked about his race for a second term. “I don’t dispute that whatsoever.” *Calendar:* *Sec. Clinton's upcoming appearances as reported online. Not an official schedule.* · December 1 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton keynotes a League of Conservation Voters dinner (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/hillary-clinton-green-groups-las-vegas-111430.html?hp=l11> ) · December 4 – Boston, MA: Sec. Clinton speaks at the Massachusetts Conference for Women (MCFW <http://www.maconferenceforwomen.org/speakers/>) · December 16 – New York, NY: Sec. Clinton honored by Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights (Politico <http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/hillary-clinton-ripple-of-hope-award-112478.html> ) · February 24 – Santa Clara, CA: Sec. Clinton to Keynote Address at Inaugural Watermark Conference for Women (PR Newswire <http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hillary-rodham-clinton-to-deliver-keynote-address-at-inaugural-watermark-conference-for-women-283200361.html> )