EFTA00955188.pdf

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Richard Kahn • Subject: Re: update Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:56:41 +0000 i thouught so also On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Richard Kahn < > wrote: could reputation changer be promoting negative articles to make it appear that we need them... Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc. 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, New York 10022 tel fax cell Begin forwarded message: From: Date: February 22, 2013 8:54:55 AM EST To: Jeffrey Epstein leevacation@gmailcom> Cc: Richard Kahn <I Subject: Re: update Hi Jeffrey, I think reputation worked for the national but not the local at all. I'll let you know what they say after I call them today. On Feb 22, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: i am confused by how backward things have gone. do you think repuation worked . ? On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:00 PM, > wrote: Hi Jeffrey and Rich, Summary of my work for the last month: Jan 15 - Feb 15: • created a new international website. Fully optimized. • published 5 press articles • edited 11 articles for Reputation. • updated 7 websites with 14 more pages of content in total. • updated google's search optimization for all 8 websites. EFTA00955188  • general correspondence and monitoring of Reputation's work. Results: national: 1 negative listing in 3rd place. local: 3 negative listings: 4th, 5th, 6th. I've seen no improvement in the local results in the last month. In fact, it's worse in the last week. I'm doing everything I can to boost the websites but the local press easily dominates. Moving forward: I'm finishing up with content for the forum that Jeffrey sent me. After that, I don't think it makes sense for me to continue as is. The progress on the national front is good. But not the local. So, 1. I either stop entirely. 2. Or continue to boost all websites regularly at 1/2 salary-- concentrating on directory listings. Press releases are expensive. 3. Supplement the above with a proposal that I have to present on deciphering signal cell intelligence. Thank you for your thoughts, cell: email: *********************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this EFTA00955189  communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in en-or, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00955190