📄 Extracted Text (426 words)
Echoing the on-going SOE reform, the statement said to "actively" develop a mixed ownership economy, to
improve the modern enterprise system and corporate governance structure, and to promote equity transfer.
Specifically, it encouraged the employee stock ownership as well as M&A among companies of different
ownership. Entry barrier and acquisition restriction on private companies will be further removed.
In our view, the mixed ownership reform is the key for China reform package on corporate level, which
will help enhance SOEs' performance, unleash potential of private companies, better allocate resources as
well as boost economic potential growth. According to our calculation, by Feb 2014, 62% of all Chinese
listcos' market cap was SOEs either central or local ones, while private-owned only accounted for 38%.
Among listed SOEs, 54% operated in monopolized sectors like oil & gas, banking, telecom and
transportation, 42% operated in competitive sectors like food & beverage, auto, equipment, etc. Going
forward, we expect 1) more monopolized central SOEs, in oil & gas, telecom and transportation, to open up
for private capital investment with minority shares; 2) large chunk of local SOE shares in competitive
sectors like F&8, apparel, electrics and healthcare will be taken over by private capitals; 3) more local
SOEs assets to be listed or injected into listcos. more details of
this reform will be elaborated in the upcoming SOE reform plan.
managing a balance between innovation, development and financial risk prevention
while encouraging the innovation and modernization in china capital market, the authorities still keep
the financial stability as paramount. Risk control, monitoring, reporting and disposal will go side by
side with financial market evolvement. And most importantly, the bottom line of "no systemic or regional
risk" will be firmly held, as per the Guideline. The policy also requires good management on the
relationships of market vs. government, and investors at their own risk vs. investor protection.
Investors should have a rational investment principle, awareness of risks, responsible for their actions
and self-protection ability. Regulators will provide investors, especially small investors, the rights to
know, to participate, to appeal and to supervise.
The statement is in line with the "orderly default" concept proposed by regulators in regard of trust
market and other shadow banking market risk.
ni(5 067 nibo
dyh 8)2 [email protected]
mddmeodoi:i16pDthBk a-nnrec-oaib a to eo.
t:feo.rc/27140heDthBkalneAohmi.f
esea'arwngeah wvlloidAohot v t:feo.rc/27140heDthBkalneAohMi.f
lkcyh nio oetae eer t/u.-recc/175/23/_tlh0--_0681dp.fohendfuycsnt ptpa rrtsmli eo 0 eue
[email protected] cshro resehp/..m
oheeidh ibaeoheucb oayAaaf M spn omsTefeahGel
ocnsoo rnrecssii,itts/[email protected]
lsrett pclladcirit lro.
a fee9b04c/yadc
CONFIDENTIAL — PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0101854
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00248038
EFTA01447270
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
9f207ad04cfb4cb7ff375d1e4257ff0314323444a6a4a5c48c1c2cdafecd1dbd
Bates Number
EFTA01447270
Dataset
DataSet-10
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0