👁 1
💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (531 words)
From: Gordon Getty
To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Cc: Alan Rogers
Subject: Re:
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:58:54 +0000
Sounds right.
On Nov 26, 2013, at 2:39, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote:
my funded attack on indiv fitness
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Alan Rogers < > wrote:
My paper was about the evolution of menopause. George Williams had argued years before that as women
age, the risk of childbirth mortality increases. Eventually, that risk outweighs the potential fitness gain from
another child. My paper showed that this doesn't work--the risk of childbirth mortality is too low. I saw more
promise in a hypothesis having to do with opportunity cost. To do these calculations, I needed an age-
structured theory of kin selection with a time delay between the investment (forgone pregnancy) and the
return on that investment (ability to care for one's previous children). So the model had economic
pretensions, and I eventually used it to study the evolution of time preference. It was the time preference
work that brought me into contact with Gordon G.
Alan
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote:
risk of death in childbirth?
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Alan Rogers < > wrote:
Charlesworth and Chamov published an age-structured theory of kin selection in 1981 (JTB 88:103) and
Taylor and Frank did it a different way in 1996 (JTB 180:27). I added time delays to the Charlesworth-
Charnov model in 1993 (Evollutionary Ecology 7:406). These models all grow out of the ideas that
Hamilton introduced in his "Moulding of senescence" paper in 1966. But Hamilton 1966 didn't do kin
selection. He did however argue that reproductive value is not the right way to formulate the problem.
His model (and also those mentioned above) use the numerator of reproductive value, but the
normalization is different. To put this differently, the reproductive value at age x needs to be weighted by
l_x, the probability of surviving to that age. This weighting is missing from the formulation directly in
terms of reproductive value.
Alan
2013/11/25 Gordon Getty
EFTA00977115
***********************************************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jea®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
<PNAS I 3.pdf>
EFTA00977116
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
9f5c150388e5a79b2a6d192f4ca3ce7e1729ffcfe06a76be996e3435364ddeed
Bates Number
EFTA00977115
Dataset
DataSet-9
Type
document
Pages
2
💬 Comments 0