📄 Extracted Text (181 words)
From: "Martin G. Weinberg" <I
To: "Jeffrey E." <1
Subject: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:36:36 +0000
Importance: Normal
far more likely to be cassell than govt
for govt to disclose correspondence is to invite more use of their own end of the correspondence which is what they were
objecting to
From: jeffrey E.
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 6:17 AM
To: Martin Weinberg ; Darren Indyke
is the disclosure by the govt of plea negotiations a violation of right to privacy. ? as it is the govt that is disclosing?
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00627636
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
a147358b047fb4cd70b40f44f208cc54053e5045aef999bb8cb397c3209925d9
Bates Number
EFTA00627636
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0