📄 Extracted Text (675 words)
From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 2:55 PM
To: Steven Sinofsky
Subject: Re: contract
I'll call after board meeting
On Thursday, June =, 2013, Steven Sinofsky wrote:
I think there are three things:
• T=e timeline of section 6 is endless. For this just isn't workable.=A0 A big part of this agreement is
closure. So that isn't closure.=A0
• Not paying. It feels to me that this agreement makes it trivial for =hem to just not pay. Then I have to
sue to get paid. That seems pret=y weak in the agreement and likely. I get that if they don't want t= pay they just won't,
but the way disparagement is done it is trivial to=not pay--take some article that implies I said something (not a quote
just=reporters words) and then they don't pay. They are rolling the dice o=er if I sue or not. But the cost of the suit will
be greater than the p=yback for me so they win.
• So far, their behavior has been crazy. It seems likely it will get m=re crazy. That means the section
needs to be solid with respect to c=azy.
Sent from Wind=ws Mail on Surface RT
http://blo=.learningbyshipping.com <http://blog.learningbyshipping.com> I @stevesi
F=om: Jeffrey Epstein
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 5:22 AM
To: Steven Sinofs=y
http://blog.thekongfirm.com/2010=08/19/nondisparagement-clauses-whats-the-big-deal.aspx
<http://blog.thekongfirm.com/2010/08/19/nondisparagement-clauses-=hats-the-big-deal.aspx>
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Steven Sinofsky < /span> wrote:
But the way it=reads it is for perpetuity and I can't really talk about Microsoft. =A0I just can't have that.
Reply message
From: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]>
To: "Steven Sinofsky" <>
Subject: contract
Date: Thu, Jun 6, 2013 3:48 AM
EFTA_R1_01738507
EFTA02570504
I think it is ok. lets talk, they will never sue you=for disparagement. it would make them look ridcitulis
, =t is bad enough that they put in the non compete for 5 months.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Steven Sinofsky < rote:
Their comments will not be owned by them ... they will just be stories=about me that they
placed (including the defense of this contract).
the biggest issue for me is section 6 -- it is a perpetuity agreement.=A0 I was on a 12 month
schedule for this whole thing. I can't figure rut what can be said or not and for how long or not.
Sent from Windows Mail
F=om: Jeffrey Epstein
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 1:43 PM
To: Steven Sinofsky
You can respond to their comments with abandon sobibdo not see a real issue=A0
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013, Steven Sinofsky wrote:
Section 2... a lot of section 6 hinges on this section which is that p=yment should be
made unless the agreement is "materially" breached A=D there is failure to cure. Defining what materially breached
means in =he context of section 6 is tricky and curing a vague concept of disparagement is tricky. There's an easy
argument =f "cannot unring the bell" that gets made. What I worry about is =asically not getting paid and then having to
sue.
6b. This reads like a permanent restraining order on talking about =icrosoft. Hard to
see how I could write a book or talk about Microsoft =ver. This is not good. The end date for everything was supposed
to b= 12 months. This vaguely extends it to jan 2016 but then has a clause that seems to on forever.
6c. switches to first person weirdly "me"
14. this gives 21 days for me to sign. we should understand
<=div>
</=lockquote>
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be =ttorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is in=ended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffr=y Epstein
2
EFTA_R1_01738508
EFTA02570505
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any par= thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have receiv=d this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
retur= e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachm=nts. copyright -all rights reserved
3
EFTA_R1_01738509
EFTA02570506
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
a25e1679f2544008e3cc11008bb20b5e43ce369c8afe44e84d2b0059afacb59d
Bates Number
EFTA02570504
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0