📄 Extracted Text (1,735 words)
EFTA02444456
Why Contract with Innviron?
Design of More than 250 and construction
management of more than 100 Solid Waste
Management Facilities, including Landfills,
Leachate and Gas Treatment Systems, Compost
Plants, Transfer Stations, Sorting Facilities.
Incinerators, Waste Gasification Facilities, Medical
Waste Treatment Facilities, and Hazardous Waste
Facilities
• Currently designing and permitting the first US
commercial Waste Gasification Facility in Georgia,
USA. Beginning construction on Gasification
Facility in Trinidad in November 2009.
3 lnnviron personnel assisted in development of RCRA
regulations, developed the geosynthetic lining system
technologies, and developed Sorting Facility and Compost
System Technologies.
4. Development of Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
Regulations for Many Countries and States
5 Design, Construction, and Operation of Solid Waste Facilities in
the USA, Argentina, Ecuador, the Bahamas, Oman. Lebanon,
Panama, Turkey, and the UAE.
• Published more than 100 papers on Solid and Hazardous Waste
Management
• Permitted only Hazardous Waste / Transuranic Waste
Repository in the USA
EFTA_R1_01521306
EFTA02444457
What is Gasificat
si-F--
Gasification may be defined as follows:
• "A process technology that is designed and operated 7acji4
producing synthesis gas through the chemical converse carbonaceous •
materials." 10 114
•
• "A process that converts carbonaceous mater6ts through a process involving
partial oxidation of the feedstock in a reducing atmosphere irrtife presence of
steam at temperatures sufficient to convert the feedstock to synthesis gas, to
convert inorganic matter in the feedstock to a glassy solid material known as,,
vitreous frit or slag, and to convert halogens into the corresponding acid
halides."
• "A process that incorporates a modern, high-temperature pressurized gasifier
with auxiliary gas and water treatment systems to produce refined product
synthesis gas, which when combusted, produces emissions in full compliance
with the Clean Air Act."
Wetherhold, B., Orr, D., and Maxwell, D., "A Comparison of Gasification and Incineration of Hazardous
Wastes",prepared for US Department of Energy by Radian International LLC, 30 Mar. 2000
EFTA02444458
History of Gasification
• Coal Gasification used to produce medium quality gas since
middle 1800s. Coat heated in low oxygen environment to
produce synthesis gas, that was burned for heating and
lighting in the 1800s, and burned for electricity in the 1900s.
• Gasification used for the past 50 years in the production of
fuels and chemicals.
• Waste Gasification used in treatment of hazardous wastes,
and in conversion of MSW to Medium Calorific Value (MCV)
fuel.
EFTA_R1_01521308
EFTA02444459
Primary Advantages of Gasification
• Ability to produce consistent, high-quality Synthesis Gas
(Syngas) that can be used for energy production;
• Ability to accommodate a wide variety of gaseous, liquid,
and solid feedstocks;
• Major components of Syngas are C412, and CO2, with low
levels of N2 and CH4. SO, a d N0.1 4F substantially lower in
Gasification Facilities:than ncineratJ n Facilities.
.k.
Yt a
IM
EFTA_R1_01521309
EFTA02444460
Major Subsystems in Gasification and
Incineration Facilities
1. Waste Preparation and Feeding
2. Combustion and Gasification
3. Combustion Gas Cleanup versus Syngas Cleanup
4. Residue and Ash/Slag Handling ■,„
Pet
4
EFTA_R1_01521310
EFTA02444461
Key Differences Between Gasification and
Incineration
2. Combustion versus Gasification
Incineration Gasification
Designed to maximize the conversion Designed to maximize the conversion
of feedstock to CO2 and H2O of feedstock to CO and H2
Large quantities of excess air Limited quantities of oxygen
Highly oxidizing environment Highly reducing environment
Operated at temperatures below the Operated at temperatures above the
ash melting point. Mineral matter ash melting point. Mineral matter
converted to bottom ash and fly ash. converted to glassy slag and fine
particulate matter (char).
Wetherhold. B., Orr, D , and Maxwell, D., "A Comparison of`Gasification and Incineration ofl-la a .d
Wastes',prepared for US Department of Energy by Radian International LLC, 30 Mar. 2000
EFTA_R1_01521311
EFTA02444462
Key Differences Between Gasification and
Incineration
3. Gas Cleanup
Incineration Gasification
Flue Gas cleanup at atmospheric Syngas cleanup at high pressure
pressure
Treated Flue Gas discharged to Treated Syngas used for Power
atmosphere Production with subsequent Flue Gas
discharge
Fuel sulfur converted to SO, and Recovery of reduced sulfur species in
discharged with Flue Gas the form of high purity elemental
sulfur or sulfuric acid byproduct
prepared for US Department of Energy by Radian International LLC, 30 Mar. 2000
EFTA_R1_01521312
EFTA02444463
Key Differences Between Gasificati
Incineration
4. Residue and Ash/Slag Handling
Incineration Gasification
Bottom ash and fly ash collected, Slag is non-leachable, non-hazardous
treated, and disposed as a hazardous and suitable for use in construction
waste. materials.
Fine particulate matter recycled to
gasifier or processed for metals
reclamation.
Wetherhold, B., On, D., and Maxwell, D., "A Comparison of Gasification and Incineration of Hazardous Wastes",
prepared for US Department of Energy by Radian International LLC, 30 Mar. 2000
EFTA_R1_01521313
EFTA02444464
Gasification System Design
1. Gasification System operate by feeding carbon-containing waste
materials into a heated chamber, with a limited and controlled
amount of oxygen. This creates reducing conditions in the
Gasification Reactor.
2. At high operating temperatures in the Gasification Reactor,
chemical bonds are broken by oxidation and steam reforming at
temperatures sufficiently high to promote rapid reactions.
Gasification Reactor temperatures in range of 1,550 to 3,500 °F.
Primary components of Syngas created in Gasification Reactor are
CO and H2, with lesser amounts of H2O, CO2, N2, C114, H2S, and HCl.
Waste materials are converted from solids to gases, they are not
burned. Therefore, Flue Gas is much cleaner for Gasification
Process.
Slag has the consistency of glass, and Sulfur may be recovered in
elemental form, which may be sold.
EFTA_R1_01521314
EFTA02444465
Key Elements to a Successful Gasification
Facility
• Sorting Line required to remove high ash content materials such as metals,
glass, concrete, brick, rock, and soil;
• C&D materials should be diverted. Plastics and wood can be separated
from CEtD and transported to Gasifier;
• Shredder and pelletizer required to produce good quality, more uniform
pellets, and to reduce moisture content of waste to about 20%;
• Two stage Gasification required, (1) Conventional Gasification to convert
solids to syngas; and (2) Ash slagging unit required to convert carbon in
ash to syngas, increase BTUs of syngas, and convert ash to slag;
• Cyclone required after Gasifier to remove particulate matter from syngas
prior to combustion in Boiler;
• Boiler with Steam Turbine more efficient than Gas Turbine; and
• Air Quality Treatment system typically consists of Acid Gas Removal Unit,
Electrostatic Precipitator, Bag House with Carbon Injection, and Stack.
EFTA_R1_01521315
EFTA02444466
INNVIRON GASIFICATION SYSTEM SC
SORTING LINE
WI MAGNETIC BELT SHREDDER
IRE DEBEADER
STACK
ELECTROSTATIC
BAG OPENER PRECIPITATOR
BAGHOUSE WI
ACID GAS CARBON & LIME
REMOVAL UNIT INJECTION
PELLETIZER
(OPTIONAL) TIRE SHREDDER
SYNGAS BOILER FLUE
FEED HOPPER
FLUIDIZED BED
GASIIER STEAM GENERATOR
CYCLONE
STEAM TURBINE
ASH/SLAG ELECTRIC
Kyr PROCESSING OUTPUT
EFTA_R1_01521316
EFTA02444467
Comparison of Waste o Ener
Technologies
Description Total Electricity Cost of Electricity Unit cost
of Waste per ton of Contstruciton produced per KW-
Technology Quantity Prepared (Millons US$) per day hr per da
(tons/day) Waste (MW- (US$/kW'
(MW-hr/ton) hrs/da,) ) hr/dia)
I nnviron 250 1.12 $25 192 $130.21
Gasifier
Incinerator 250 0.4 $75 69 $1,086.96
Plasma Arc 250 0.5 $125 10$ $1,157.41
EFTA_R1_01521317
EFTA02444468
1pitO6 I NO. CO VOC NH3 SOX PM
Concentration ppm of Pollutants
2 3 2 5 N/A N/A
@ 15%O2
Daily Emissions lbs/day 37 34 36 34 2.6 22
Annual Emissions tons/year 6.8 6.2 6.5 6.3 0.5 4.0
Exhaust temperature 26°C
EFTA_R1_01521318
EFTA02444469
Flue Gas Emissions Substa
Waste Gasification Facilities
CO, Equivalent Emissions per Unit of Power Generated
3
275
is Es
la
c IS
•
• I07
I
6
Is 05
0
Comparison on Waste-to-Energy GatlfiCallon Inc 'notation lardfilb wkli Gm Capture
Criteria Pollutants Source BOP Engineering
EGaillIcatIon
NI Incineration
CI landfill
Source:
Integra Energy
Consulting
SO2 Particulate Matta
EFTA_R1_01521319
EFTA02444470
Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan
ficartS'orting
•
EFTA02444471
•••••••I •
-__
IN N VI Re N
w...rams
1
EFTA_R1_01521321
EFTA02444472
30 Ton/Hr Shredder
Typical or 2
Reception Hopper
and Bag Opener
4' x 30' Inclined Variable
Speed Conveyor
n n n n 1
2
Li
n
4' x 2' Hopper
Horizontal Sorting Converyor
4' x 55', Variable Speed
Sorting Platform
Crossbelt Magnetic
Separator
4' x 4' Hopper
4' x 14' Horizontal Conveyor
r c Fr v.-)
3
FIGURE 3. SORTING AND SEPERATION FACILITY US09098
LAYOUT INNVIRtN " C-L C T
EFTA_R1_01521322
EFTA02444473
1 L 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1. I 1
-a ii
04111£ 10 4
INNVIRIN PROJEC1 nV US09096
DOCUMENT NO
EFTA_R1_01521323
EFTA02444474
WASTE GASIFIER DESIGN
Income from Sale of Power
Income from 10 MW Gasifier (8.0 MW of Power to Grid):
• qwaste = 250 tons/day
• qp = 171.5 tons/day
• E = (171.5 tons/day)(1.12 MW-hrs/ton)(365 days/yr)(1,000 KW-hrs/MW-
hrs)(50.10/KW-hr)
EFTA_R1_01521324
EFTA02444475
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
Description 10 MW System 30 MW System
Design and Permitting $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Construction Management $350,000 $450,000
Modification of Building $3,000,000 $5,000,000
Scales and Scalehouse $165,000 $165,000
Site Improvements $500,000 $500,000
Access Road, Fence, and Guardhouse $293,000 $293,000
10 MW Gasification System $15,000,000 $45,000,000
Mobile Plant Equipment $450,000 $650,000
Tire Shredder and Oversize Shredder $625,000 $900,000
Extend Grid 400 ft $500,000 $500,000
Offices (3000 ft2) $450,000 $450,000
Equipment Materials and Supplies $100,000 $100,000
Total Construction Cost $22,433,000 $55,008,000
Assumes that connection to Grid is at the building, no additional cost to extend
power lines to the Building
EFTA_R1_01521325
EFTA02444476
TYPICAL COMPONENTS OF REVENUE
Description 10 MW System 30 MW System
Tipping Fee to Process Waste:
$40 per ton $3,942,000 $11,826,000
Sale of Recyclables:
Ferrous Metals: ($60/ton) $280,977 $842,931
Aluminum: ($750/ton) $183,413 $550,239
Processing Fee:
Tires: (1 ton/day) S36,500 $109,500
Telephone Poles and RR Ties (1 ton/day) $36,500 $109,500
Sale of Power: $7,010,920 $21,032,760
TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUE $11,490,310 $34,470,930
TOTAL PROJECTED OPERATING COST $6,894,186 $17,235,465
TOTAL PROJECTED EBITDA $4,596,124 $17,235,465
EFTA_R1_01521326
EFTA02444477
Conclusions
1. Need Tire Shredder and Debeader to process tires
2. Need Oversize Shredder to process Telephone Poles and Railroad Ties
3. Sorting Line needed to process waste, remove metals and HHW, protect >\
Shredder, Pelletizer, and Gasifier, and provide more uniform pellets
4. Facility would create a minimum of 21 to 50 new jobs
5. Potential Additional Sources of Income:
Tires ($2/tire)
Telephone Poles and Railroad Ties
Carbon Credits
Government Stimulus Money and Subsidies
EFTA_R1_01521327
EFTA02444478
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
• Long-Term Contract: Minimum Term = 20 years
• Availability of waste (250 tons/day, 365 days/yr, for each 10 MW
Gasification Line)
• 8.0 MW/hr to Grid for each 10 MW Gasification Line
• Support in Permitting the Facility
• Assistance to Obtain Power Buy Back Agreement with the Local Utility
Company or Base
EFTA_R1_01521328
EFTA02444479
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
a2c577dba22a4abc73fe7da5aeeaeabf46b4f393f5f10c546e499634a43dffd0
Bates Number
EFTA02444456
Dataset
DataSet-11
Document Type
document
Pages
24
Comments 0